Carsten’s example results in the sequence
1. bind X ranking 1
2. bind X ranking 100
3 unbind X ranking 1
IIRC this is explicitly mandated by the spec. This is a different order than
Tom’s example.
FWIW I suspect Tom’s situation can arise after component activation if two
threads register two mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed FELIX-1864.
---
Resolution: Invalid
This is certainly no longer relevant
> Manual is not longer genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17467775#comment-17467775
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6069:
-
I don't think there's any pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17467773#comment-17467773
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5076:
-
I'll note that this issue was op
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17467772#comment-17467772
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5076:
-
Thanks Alexander!!!
> Website shows a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed FELIX-4895.
---
> dead link to FAQ page
> -
>
> Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks resolved FELIX-4895.
-
Resolution: Fixed
No longer a problem. Thanks Alexander!
> dead link to FAQ p
Wasn’t the vote open for only about 66 hours? No vetos in the following 6
hours, but….
David Jencks
> On Oct 24, 2021, at 2:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> This vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding): Ray Augé, JB Onofré, P
recall also controlling whether instances are created by having a
mandatory reference and adjusting the target filter in configuration so it is
or isn’t satisfied.
David Jencks
> On Sep 7, 2021, at 6:02 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
>
> The condition specification is part of OSGi R8
robably adjust.
It might have been more appropriate to bring this up when I proposed using
Antora.
I’m curious what you prefer about markdown. I would not participate in a
documentation project using markdown rather than AsciiDoc: I find it ugly and
limited.
David Jencks
>
> Regards
&g
currently relying
on READMEs and moving the docs for the other subprojects from the
felix-antora-site repo to appropriate places in felix-dev.
David Jencks
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> The new version of that page,
> https://felix.staged.apache.org/d
I’ve switched the site over to the Antora site….
https://felix.apache.org/index.html
Assuming no major problems surface I’ll ask infra to decommission the CMS area
in the next day or two.
David Jencks
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 1:42 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> +1
>
> And th
atomos readme to guide me. At
the moment there’s no binary artifact listed for atomos.
David Jencks
can then debate.
Note that all releases remain available in the archives, as well as from maven
central.
David Jencks
.
I’ll see about setting up a preview for scr, since I already translated the
README to .adoc.
In any case I’d suggest translating all the READMEs to AsciiDoc so all the
documentation is in the same language. GitHub renders AsciiDoc for READMEs
automatically.
David Jencks
> On Jul 27, 2
community.
- Most likely soon it will be plausible to include javadoc as site pages with
navigation, ability to link to javadoc pages, etc. AFAICT the limited apidocs
currently in the site are not linked to in any way.
David Jencks
to be deactivated in a few days. If there are no more
comments I’m going to switch over to the new site on Wednesday July 28 (2
days). I think the new site is definitely in usable condition and we can deal
with any remaining problems as they appear.
David Jencks
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 4:57
compliant?".
And a couple of comments/questions below…
Thanks!
David Jencks
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 2:39 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> thanks again for taking care of this. Looks very good overall. I
> noticed some minor issues namely,
>
> - In the top ri
Thanks!, fixed.
David Jencks
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 1:04 AM, Александр Шаклеин wrote:
>
> Hi all
> Tutorials page starting with code block
>
> ср, 21 июл. 2021 г., 10:01 David Jencks :
>
>> I’ve updated the UI to fix the problems noted, and made the logo have a
&
not any worse than the current download page where these links are all broken.
Any other comments? I think infra would appreciate us switching to the new
site soon.
Thanks
David Jencks
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 11:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Great idea, and it l
al: we
> could make the Felix logo transparent so that it looks dissolved on the
> background.
>
> Best Regards,
> Amit
> ____
> From: David Jencks
> Sent: 20 July 2021 02:25
> To: dev@felix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Preview of new
link broken.
I’d like to integrate the README-based subproject documentation (e.g. atomos,
scr) better but I’ll discuss that in another email.
David Jencks
> On Jul 14, 2021, at 2:18 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> sounds like very good progress - thanks a lot for lo
- Construct an appropriate .htaccess file mapping old page locations to new
ones.
- Finish the new download page.
- Set up a preview site.
- Review everything.
- Adjust .asf.yml to publish site.
- Deactive the CMS site.
We could start with the last two steps, but I’d rather not.
David Jencks
problems anyone notices?
Thanks
David Jencks
nt effort to maintain.
3. I suggest we remove all non-maintained subprojects from the download page.
They will always be available from the historical releases, but we shouldn’t
be encouraging anyone to use them.
Comments? Suggestions?
Thanks
David Jencks
ed? I
think having documentation easily visible gives an impression that using these
projects is plausible.
Perhaps we can have a branch in felix-site-pub where the last version of the
html can be looked at, and links to it from an “obsolete subproject” page.
Thanks
David Jencks
more and I’ve had infra turn the commit notifications back on, but you can
certainly work on a PR. I think the DM .adocs are fine, but haven’t reviewed
recently. I also need to push the repo that has the site build. It’s too hot
here to do much but I hope to make progress soon.
David Jencks
Hi Pierre,
I should be able to push the current state later Sunday. I’ve already
converted the content to asciidoc, with some exceptions I need to discuss
separately. I think the DM content is all converted.
Thanks,
David Jencks
> On Jun 26, 2021, at 1:20 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote:
>
but then
I’ll have to port the changes, which is certainly possible but more work for me.
David Jencks
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I did not have time to follow, but I think that David (Jencks) is working
> on migrating the feli
I’m waiting on INFRA-21834 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21834>.
David Jencks
> On Jun 17, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote:
>
> The Jira ticket infra-20635 is supposed to cover progress on migration of
> your project website off the Apache CMS a
time on
it. IIRC there’s discussion on the builds mailing list.
I didn’t use GH actions for the Aries website build because of this.
Jenkins is worse documented and somewhat harder to set up but seems to have
better sharing behavior, at least reviewed and possibly controlled by infra.
David
contributions from
non-project-members and that it is possible to gain commit karma?
I think moving the implementation is a good idea but I’m a little worried. I
guess we could always fork it again if problems appear.
David Jencks
> On May 7, 2021, at 2:18 AM, dav...@apache.org wrote:
>
As usual I found a way to express myself ambiguously :-)
I meant more “will if be convenient for everyone to avoid making any CMS site
updates” :-)
Thanks
David Jencks
> On May 4, 2021, at 12:18 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 11:37 -0700, Dav
I’ve figured out how to automate Antora website builds on the Aries website and
would like to finish up the Felix site migration in the next few days.
The last CMS site update appears to have been in February. Would it be
practical to avoid further updates to the CMS site?
Thanks
David Jencks
ng for community feedback on the Aries
Antora-built site before suggesting we switch.
Thanks,
David Jencks
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 6:21 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote:
>
> Hi, Felix folks and Daivd in particular.
>
> In reference to Jira ticket infra-20635, we are ready to move ahead w
documentation. I suggest that for such subprojects, we consider
moving the documentation to the subproject and having a short non-copied
README.adoc pointing to the website.
Is migrating the docs for dead/retired subprojects a good idea?
David Jencks
maven
dependencies.
Can we drop this page and stop this confusing and useless practice?
David Jencks
significantly more
documentation than is in the current README. Have the optional extensions I
wrote been removed? I haven’t really been paying attention.
David Jencks
> On Sep 1, 2020, at 1:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> I’ve made a _little_ progress, I’ve converted the content to asc
-index.html
<https://felix-preview.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documentation/auto-index.html>.
There’s lots more to do. If anyone is interested in looking or helping I can
push my local repos to GitHub or even set up Apache git repos for the projects
and push to them.
David Jencks
> On Aug
I started on a migration, I’ll post more when I have more.
David Jencks
> On Aug 25, 2020, at 12:09 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> That would be great - the location is:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/site/
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 20
I _might_ be able to do a migration to Antora soon. I’ve been working on one
for Aries.
IIUC a CMS site is somewhere in svn…. does anyone know the address for the
Felix site?
David Jencks
> On Aug 24, 2020, at 1:56 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> coming back to this is
Converting the Aries website to Antora seems to be fairly easy and quick, most
likely I could do much of that that here too.
David Jencks
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 6:32 AM, Raymond Auge
> wrote:
>
> Hey Karl,
>
> The more time passes the less time I will have to do this work, b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17169175#comment-17169175
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6315:
-
It's been years, but I think
be useful if
fileinstall could (perhaps through configuration) set this expression on all
configurations it loads.
WDYT?
David Jencks
> On Jul 17, 2020, at 11:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We fixed an important issue in Felix FileInstall introduced i
+1
David Jencks
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I think the discussion of the "application metrics bundles" contribution
> (https://github.com/apache/sling-whiteboard/tree/master/osgi-metrics)
> by Robert Munteanu has died down by now. It looks like
about what these are).
I do think that this initiative is a great idea! Maybe you could start it at
GitHub while the location/name/description is hammered out?
Thanks,
David Jencks
>
> Christian
>
>
> Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 00:05 Uhr schrieb David Jencks <
> david.a.
spring for osgi) project
would fit in felix.
Thanks
David Jencks
> On Apr 12, 2020, at 2:05 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> I don't think we are at that point just yet. Given that this is a
> holiday surrounded weekend for a lot of us (due to the easter break)
I don’t think anyone should take my opinion as definitive, but when I (briefly)
reviewed this some time ago I thought the proposed changes were fine. Since
the spec apparently suggests that this “service on demand” scenario should be
supported, I think this is a good idea.
David Jencks
>
+1
I think your plan will be a big improvement for now and allow for further
rearrangement if needed.
thanks!
David Jencks
> On Feb 21, 2020, at 8:27 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know i've been dragging my feet with regard to the migration to git.
> Unfortuna
+1
David Jencks
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 1:40 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I think the discussion of the "Atomos" contribution
> (https://github.com/tjwatson/atomos) by Thomas Watson has died down by
> now. It looks like there is quite some interest in the idea and
> as
+1
David Jencks
> On Nov 19, 2019, at 1:11 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> Following up on the discussion about moving Felix to git I'd like to
> call for a vote now.
>
> The idea is to ask Infra to move the current svn to gitbox
> (https://gitbox.apache.org) which will
I’m not exactly active currently, but +1
David Jencks
> On Nov 2, 2019, at 5:41 AM, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>
> I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if people
> like this.
> It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16928232#comment-16928232
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6161:
-
I doubt that will be practical, but I c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16885870#comment-16885870
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6161:
-
Our comments crossed... I think that F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16885866#comment-16885866
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6161:
-
Rereading FELIX-4964, I see that my &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16885636#comment-16885636
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6161:
-
Looking briefly at your patch from the p
.
Hope this helps, and thanks for raising this interesting problem.
David Jencks
> On Jul 14, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Arnoud Glimmerveen
> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your response and providing some background on the behaviour of
> Felix SCR with respect to hand
peculiar and is mixing logical
levels. Even if you can get it to work I’d advise looking at your problem from
a different angle to find a different solution.
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 13, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Arnoud Glimmerveen
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am exper
cache?
Thanks
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 9:35 AM, tjwat...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: tjwatson
> Date: Wed Jul 3 16:35:54 2019
> New Revision: 1862491
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1862491&view=rev
> Log:
> FELI
coming and going on other
threads.
Why does this component need to start asynchronously?
Thanks
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 6:56 AM, Cristiano wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We have a system where we use Felix Configurator in order to
> initiate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed FELIX-6105.
---
> [DS] SCR does not add the component bundle location to the Configuration
> o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks resolved FELIX-6105.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
DS used to set the bundle location, however this leads to an unavoi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793045#comment-16793045
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5802:
-
Wow, I've never heard of Gravity bef
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793014#comment-16793014
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5802:
-
Rob-
The meanings of framework-singl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793000#comment-16793000
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5802:
-
In the SCR-xml singleton case, the ob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16792973#comment-16792973
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5802:
-
I don't understand the point of vie
approach?
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
>
> The problem with loading the class at all, even later as a dynamic import,
> is then it creates a wire with the go go bundle. That means when go-go is
> uninstalled then scr w
…
David Jencks
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
>
> The problem is if scr is not resolved against the optional import for the
> command package then the annotations are unrecognized by the gogo runtime.
> So if scr is resolved before the gogo bundles are installed
?
Thanks
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 16, 2019, at 3:44 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
>
> I'll take the resounding silence as everyone holding their breath in
> anticipation.
>
> Thx,
> - Ray
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Raymond Auge
> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16762212#comment-16762212
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6050:
-
The motivation was to provide a sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16750521#comment-16750521
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6034:
-
Apparently Karaf does have an opt-out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16739656#comment-16739656
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6019:
-
I'm getting more confused. Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16738564#comment-16738564
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6019:
-
I think you have created a new concep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16738511#comment-16738511
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-6019:
-
IIUC the problem you are actually tryin
+1
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 5:56 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I would like to call for a vote to accept the contribution of the
> Sling Health Checks.
>
> You can read up on the initial discussion in [0] and find the
> contribution on [1]. The
there was no way
to go back and get the annotations. Perhaps someone has solved this problem
since, but any code complexity around this is silly.
david jencks
> On Oct 21, 2018, at 11:55 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:47 AM Guillaume Nodet <mailto:gno..
If you've bothered to set the service ranking, then in theory it matters which
one you get :-)
I like the default of preferring greedy in order to get reproducible results.
Configurable choices would be ok for experts :-)
David Jencks
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Carsten Ziegele
config admin to the actual
number of services, you probably want the greedy behavior for multiple
cardinality references. The situation for single cardinality is more debatable.
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Mark Derricutt
> wrote:
>
> Hey
wrong, and that I
implemented something similar to what Felix has here. So, I think it’s quite
possible that Felix’s solution is the best possible even if there are conflicts
with the servlet spec.
David Jencks
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 7:28 PM, Rob Walker wrote:
>
> Carsten
>
> Been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16464978#comment-16464978
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5844:
-
The behavior is per spec. Think of the ob
+1
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 1:44 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we
would handle the
persistence, leaving all this complexity out of scr entirely. This would make
something like the referenced adobe project work without the components
starting first.
david jencks
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
>
> In my original request the e
components at its whim.
Thanks
David Jencks
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Roy Teeuwen wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I too have used a tool more than once to disable a component [1], most of the
> time because built in components of a system you don't have under control
report of the enablement overrides?
So far I’m not thrilled with the idea of adding a persistence mechanism to scr,
but I haven’t run into the scenarios you mention. I’d think making the
components configuration required and dealing with config admin would be a
simpler approach.
David Jencks
Sent
not sure
the code supporting them is complex enough to worry about. For the most part I
think the behaviors of the extensions are fairly useful so I’d be reluctant to
remove them. Making an osgi server that uses them not able to upgrade to r7 is
a pretty big restriction.
David Jencks
Sent from
As I recall (possibly wrongly) there are no ComponentConfigurationDTOs for
instances created from a factory component, so a command based on DTOs would
have had difficulty displaying info about them. Has this changed in the r7
spec, or, perhaps, is my recollection wrong?
David Jencks
Sent
.
I was never able to figure out how to get the Gogo annotations to work if Gogo
was loaded after ds. Have you solved this problem? As I recall the commands
were available in Gogo but the help about them was not.
Thanks
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Raym
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed FELIX-5618.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in r7 copy with r1803595. I haven't been able to get eclipse to open th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16108097#comment-16108097
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5618:
-
Fixed in trunk r1803592.
> Cycle
I’m getting more and more confused :-( Are the services you’re trying to
advertise implemented with DS components?
Looking at the bnd code I don’t see how it can be replacing any provide service
header parts. Can you explain in detail the scenario that “won’t work”?
thanks
david jencks
would be interested to know what the gradle magic is….
thanks
david jencks
> On Jul 13, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 10:53, David Leangen wrote:
>
> Working with gradle, these headers are generated automagically, but I’m not
> sure what the
I wrote it manually (in a bnd.bnd file) for DS. If Peter has thought up some
way of generating this since then you are more likely to find out about it
asking on the bnd list.
david jencks
> On Jul 11, 2017, at 5:06 AM, David Leangen wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Without having
synchronization
barriers. Have you looked at the code to see?
thanks
david jencks
> On May 2, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Dirk Hogan wrote:
>
> Hi Raymond-
> Assume Felix does it's thing: sets all @References, activates all
> components, publishes all services. It has resolved all dep
.
thanks
david jencks
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 1:13 AM, Julian Sedding wrote:
>
> My theory is as follows:
>
> 1. DS creates a new instances of the service S1 in thread T1
> 2. DS injects the (static) @Reference service in thread T1
> 3. DS calls activate() in thread T1
> 4. at t
any thread will have the correct value.
thanks
david jencks
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Dirk Hogan wrote:
>
> I have been puzzled about the visibility of references written/read across
> threads in Felix.
>
> Scenario:
>
> public class myOSGiCom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15983797#comment-15983797
]
David Jencks commented on FELIX-5618:
-
I'm proposing this solutio
losing_paren_in_try"
> value="insert"/>
> id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.insert_space_before_closing_paren_in_while"
> value="insert"/>
283c283
<
---
>
I think it’s a bit odd that constructor and method declarations don’t have
spa
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> David Jencks wrote
>> Maybe I missed it, but in the future could you announce that you plan a
>> release? I would have liked to get FELIX-5618
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5618> a
has resulted
in the current target of the coding-standards page link being the 2nd
attachment to the issue.
thanks
david jencks
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> this might be an eclipse config.
> Open preferences and go to
Maybe I missed it, but in the future could you announce that you plan a
release? I would have liked to get FELIX-5618
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5618> and the warning for
FELIX-5621 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5621> in.
thanks
david jencks
>
1 - 100 of 1129 matches
Mail list logo
