Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, I think I have set all the wheels in motion; 1. Checked that ICLAs are properly on file for Makas and Edward. 2. Accounts requested for Makas and Edward. 3. IP Clearance form filled out. 4. Requested the lazy consensus from the Incubator PMC to approve the IP Clearance form. An

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-27 Thread Richard S. Hall
Niclas Hedhman wrote: Gang, I think I have set all the wheels in motion; 1. Checked that ICLAs are properly on file for Makas and Edward. 2. Accounts requested for Makas and Edward. 3. IP Clearance form filled out. 4. Requested the lazy consensus from the Incubator PMC to approve the

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 28 July 2008 08:00, Richard S. Hall wrote: > such as Flogger, for Felix logger, +1 for Flogger. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-27 Thread Marcel Offermans
I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something like plugable logger, or log adapter. We have not made up these type of names for our other components, so why start here? Then again, I don't really mind. :) Greetings, Marcel -Original Message- On Monday 28 J

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-28 Thread Richard S. Hall
Marcel Offermans wrote: I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something like plugable logger, or log adapter. We have not made up these type of names for our other components, so why start here? That is not true, we have iPOJO, for example, but I supposed we could

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: > I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something > like plugable logger, or log adapter. Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing Log framework in legacy code that is OSGi-enabled without being OS

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-28 Thread Richard S. Hall
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something like plugable logger, or log adapter. Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing Log framework in legacy code that is

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-28 Thread Marcel Offermans
Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: > >> I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something >> like plugable logger, or log adapter. >> > > Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing Log framework in > legac

Re: Pax Logging Status Update

2008-07-28 Thread Richard S. Hall
Marcel Offermans wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something like plugable logger, or log adapter. Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing