On 10/10/13 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop
>>branch.
>Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd
>reason I'll fix and merge for you.
OK, was able to reproduce the problem. I've never worked w
Hi,
> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop branch.
Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd reason I'll
fix and merge for you.
> Should I just push everything to develop then merge all of it to release?
That seems the simplest way to me.
>
On 10/10/13 10:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem?
>Yes in the release branch. But the release branch is merged with develop
>so you should see it there as well.
Hmm. I'll rebuild develop and see. None of the commit email
Hi,
> Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem?
Yes in the release branch. But the release branch is merged with develop so you
should see it there as well.
> Some minor stuff like missing imports for Falcon and some improvements for
> SWFDump, but also:
> FLEX-33690 <
The TLF change is part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33409
On 10/10/13 10:44 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/10/13 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>>
>>> but the main build should have failed in the same way.
>>It compiles no issues.
>Did you push the other ASDoc fixes req
On 10/10/13 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> but the main build should have failed in the same way.
>It compiles no issues.
Did you push the other ASDoc fixes required to get to this problem? I
just ran "ant asdoc" and got the AnimationTarget issue.
>
>> I have a fix for that FTETextFiel
Hi,
> I assume you meant ViewMenuLayout? The manifests, etc look ok.
Yep I meant ViewMenuLayout.
> I guess you could dump the mobilecomponents.swc and see if that class is
> actually
> in there
It;s in there:
swfdump ./mobile/mobilecomponents.swc | grep ViewMenuLayout
> but the main build
On 10/10/13 8:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fixed that issue (and a few more) but now have this one:
>doc:
>[asdoc] Loading configuration file
>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
>[asdoc]
>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/fra
On 10/10/13 7:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Being an experimental component I think just about any improvement is a
>good idea.
I agree with that statement, but is removing skinparts a "good idea"?
Simplification tends to remove flexibility. Spark components are supposed
to leave contr
Hi,
Fixed that issue (and a few more) but now have this one:
doc:
[asdoc] Loading configuration file
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
[asdoc]
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/projects/mobiletheme/src/spark/skins/mobile/Vie
Hi,
Looks like an issue with the asdocs build file - just trying to sort.
Justin
Hi,
We're currently getting this:
doc:
[asdoc] Loading configuration file
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml
[asdoc]
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.11.0/frameworks/projects/experimental/src/spark/layouts/supportClasses/AnimationNavigatorL
Hi,
Being an experimental component I think just about any improvement is a good
idea.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Looks like this file is showing up in ASdocs:
SampleExperimental.as
Should that be the case? and if so why is it missing an Apache header?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi, while working on FLEX-33806 (changing the message top padding of
experimental Alert),
I realized the implementation of this class was unnecessarily complex:
- it derives from Panel (ok) and adds 3 skinParts (messageDisplay ,
iconDisplay, and buttonGroup)
- Defines its own
I did more digging. Imo the clearing of the flag is not the correct fix. It
only fixes the bug because it makes the ftetextfield switch to plain text
composition which is why the tests failed. It looks like the tcm has a weird
behavior of assuming that any existing textlines were composed from t
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33810
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 00:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: describeType still used in many places in SDK
Thnaks for the info.
-M
>I'm sure some users will be very happy if you do that. You don't have to, you
>just have to judge how many people will be impacted and whether it will cause
>them to think poorly of >Apache Flex.
I have no idea how many people will be using sub-classing for CalloutSkin (like
in the mustella
Thnaks for the info.
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 23:28
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: describeType still used in many places in SDK
Hi,
I know datagrid use objectUtil describeType and caches the XML structu
Hi,
>> Doesn't doing this tf.text = txt also set htmlText to null?
> I don't see that happening in the setter, but I might have missed it.
Look at all the configX (1-8) methods in global.as some set htmlText, some set
text. This is one the same text field.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I know datagrid use objectUtil describeType and caches the XML structures to
work out the columns. May need to be careful around that.
Thanks,
Justin
I will use Parsley's Spicefactory implementation as a reference, to know how to
access elements. (I will not steal the code).
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 21:44
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: describeType sti
On 10/10/13 12:31 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Yes, I am just calling describeType vs decribeTypeJSON.
>
>JSON is returning an unstructured object with the following props:
>isDynamic: Bool
>isFinal: bool
>isStatic: bool
>name: String
>traits
> accessors: Array of unstructured Objects .
> b
Yes, I am just calling describeType vs decribeTypeJSON.
JSON is returning an unstructured object with the following props:
isDynamic: Bool
isFinal: bool
isStatic: bool
name: String
traits
accessors: Array of unstructured Objects .
bases: Array of Strings , for the hierarchy of supers
interfa
Sounds like it is worth doing, but let's discuss at the next level of
detail.
What was the test, just the call to describeType vs describeTypeJSON?
IIRC, the XML format is such that you may use the ".." expression to grab
the superclass's set of a particular thing of interest, and in JSON you
ca
I agree. I think 10.2 is the right "breaking point" with Apache Flex.
This has been confirmed by most of our customers...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 20:50
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: describeType still us
There is other stuff in the SDK that doesn't work on 10.1 and earlier. I
don't think this is a good time to try to shim/polyfill/fake that stuff or
add code paths to deal with missing stuff, but I won't object if someone
is itching to do it.
-Alex
On 10/10/13 11:43 AM, "Tianzhen Lin" wrote:
>I
I venture to guess Flash Player may dominate nearly 90% of the FP's? On the
other hand, I wonder if it is feasible to write a pre-FP 10.2 implementation
of describeTypeJSON to help make up the functionality. If so, we can still
extend our support.
Tangent
-Original Message-
From: Mauric
describeTypeJSON has access control flags:
INCLUDE_BASES | INCLUDE_INTERFACES | INCLUDE_VARIABLES | INCLUDE_ACCESSORS |
INCLUDE_METHODS | INCLUDE_METADATA | INCLUDE_CONSTRUCTOR | INCLUDE_TRAITS |
HIDE_OBJECT| USE_ITRAITS;
For the tests, I have using all the flags, to be equivalent with former
d
(EDITED: added new lines):
I just did some benchmarks on UI and non UI classes (run several times each
test, the results are consistent) :
[trace] [Chrono: [class Button] descripeType x1000] duration= 11.123 s
[trace] [Chrono: [class Label] descripeType x1000] duration= 12.064 s
[trace] [Ch
I just did some benchmarks on UI and non UI classes (run several times each
test, the results are consistent) .
[trace] [Chrono: [class Button] descripeType x1000] duration= 11.123 s
[trace] [Chrono: [class Label] descripeType x1000] duration= 12.064 s
[trace] [Chrono: [class EntityMosaic] descr
Hmm, looks like something broke in the current overlay's compiler. I'll
try to get everything re-synced and publish a new overlay after I finish
up on some of these SDK mustella failures.
-Alex
On 10/9/13 12:22 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I am trying to build out a Dojo based component se
I wouldn't bother.
On 10/10/13 10:44 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>That may sound like a dumb question, but since Apache Flex only supports
>FP 10.2 and beyond, do we even need to make the check for 10.1 ?
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@dig
That may sound like a dumb question, but since Apache Flex only supports FP
10.2 and beyond, do we even need to make the check for 10.1 ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 19:14
À : dev@flex.apache.
On 10/11/2013 12:16 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
i have a very vague recollection that somebody partially ported icu4j/icu4c
to
AS3 (maybe just the calenders). wondering what happened to it?
You may be recalling my work. Not sure.
no idea who authored it, very likely it was you ;-) recall f
>i have a very vague recollection that somebody partially ported icu4j/icu4c to
AS3 (maybe just the calenders). wondering what happened to it?
You may be recalling my work. Not sure.
>could the flasCC or whatever its called now be used to wrapper/import the
>icu4c bits???
Tried that first, it p
>Before we switch to it, we have to be absolutely sure of when it was first
>supported. I wouldn't want to break our Flash version compatibility range.
>But otherwise, I have no objections if you want to switch to it.
If it helps, in my code, I am checking for FP10.1 or higher which is when I
>Before we switch to it, we have to be absolutely sure of when it was first
>supported. I wouldn't want to break our Flash version compatibility range.
>But otherwise, I have no objections if you want to switch to it.
Internally describeType now calls describeTypeJSON and then serializes the
When you try to use FTE within MX components without a stylesheet
explicitly declared it won't render any text under certain circumstances.
This was just a simple fix to force the htmlText to be regenerated and
therefore display. I ran into this issue when trying to debug an issue I
was having wi
I have tested with 10.0, 10.1 and 10.2
It's not in 10.0 (only describeType)
It's in 10.1 and 10.2 => "package" avmplus.describeTypeJSON()
I will do the benchmarks when I have some spare time.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octob
Before we switch to it, we have to be absolutely sure of when it was first
supported. I wouldn't want to break our Flash version compatibility
range. But otherwise, I have no objections if you want to switch to it.
-Alex
On 10/10/13 9:13 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Well , surprisingly enou
Ok, thanks.
I can't remember why I even started doing this in the first place -
honestly.
I do remember having problems with dispatching an event in one particular
circumstance, so I did this and didn't look back.
Bad habits die hard I guess.
Thanks for the response :)
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:2
Well , surprisingly enough, it's not in any of the official Adobe docs :-( .
I have reviewed the release notes of FlashPlayer 10.1 to 10.3 => not any
mention.
Not in the asdocs either.
However, it's in the playerglobal.swc (flash.utils.describeTypeJSON)
and it's already used in some of IOC fra
On 10/10/13 8:58 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>I get it.
>
>So I will try to change the code so that it supports both the old
>behavior (ie by subclassing) and new behavior (ie by styling).
I'm sure some users will be very happy if you do that. You don't have to,
you just have to judge how
I get it.
So I will try to change the code so that it supports both the old behavior (ie
by subclassing) and new behavior (ie by styling).
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 16:56
À : Maurice Amsellem; dev@flex.apache
Hi Alex, thanks for the clarification.
I already tried to guess what was missing, but there are just too many things
(views, renderers ...)
So I guess the tests will remain excluded.
Hopefully, we still have an indirect testing of Callout in SplitViewNavigator
:-)
Maurice
-Message d'ori
On 10/10/13 7:25 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>While digging into MXML binding code, I discovered it was using
>DescribeTypeCache class, which is still relying on the old describeType()
>XML instead of the new describeTypeJSON()
>
>Hopefully, it's only called in some specific binding si
On 10/10/13 12:17 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
>But how do I generate the 4 other ones?
>I tried different Target_os_name and adl_extras but it didn't work.
Don't worry about any other bitmaps for now. They are broken in lots of
other cases as well.
-Alex
On 10/10/13 3:18 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have noticed mobile mustella tests on CalloutButton were excluded.
>
>History of mustella1.properties says:
>Peter Ent on 12/21/12: excluding Callout test suite due to missing
>source files.
>
>Is there a chance we can get these missing
I'm not an expert on this stuff at all. This is the first I've heard of
it, but it looks like browser support is pretty high with the exception of
Android). Support in Flex might require a server as the data would need
to be transcoded into a SWF. I suppose an AS Worker could be asked to do
it,
On 10/10/2013 11:14 AM, Thomas Wright wrote:
Second - is there a better way to handle this, or is this legit?
From an encapsulation perspective, the renderer shouldn't know its
parents.
I always recommend dispatching an event, that bubbles from the
renderer and then handling it in the compo
That happens sometimes, I would recommend using Flexmojos to do auto clean
build all the time to make sure everything is updated.
I upgraded the code long time ago, but still having the same problem, I
will try the default skin this afternoon.
-Gary
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Lee Burrows
I have a question about garbage collection in reference to a technique I've
used on a fairly regular basis.
Perhaps this is bad form, but this is what I've been doing nonetheless.
So this is as close to what I've been doing as possible, let's consider a
mobile app in my example of this method.
Sa
Unfortunately, the old way does compile successfully - i'm assuming
gridView is not an IVisualElement so is not a [SkinPart]
I assume it would be straight-forward to throw an error if gridView==null
On 10/10/2013 16:10, Gary Young wrote:
well, if this code is not upgraded, it won't compile ri
well, if this code is not upgraded, it won't compile right?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Lee Burrows
wrote:
> Ok, the problem was a change to Grid component updated in the default
> DataGrid skin wasn't reflected in my custom skin.
>
> In 4.9.1 and previous, the skin contained:
>
>
>
Ok, the problem was a change to Grid component updated in the default
DataGrid skin wasn't reflected in my custom skin.
In 4.9.1 and previous, the skin contained:
As of 4.10.0 it is:
On 10/9/13 11:51 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Understood.
>
>In this case, I' am changing the test code so that it matches the
>existing baseline, not changing the baseline.
>So it should not have any impact.
Maybe I'm not understanding you, but IMO, the test code represents a
user's applicat
On 10/10/13 12:01 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The test doesn't seem to be setting htmlText to null, but I haven't
>>stepped through it.
>Doesn't doing this tf.text = txt also set htmlText to null?
I don't see that happening in the setter, but I might have missed it. And
for me, the fa
On 10/10/13 4:40 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>My revert was on hash e3d52e485c1063a71d3682750ac0c2eb833f193a
>submitted on 10/8/13 @ 12:15am according to my git history. I haven't
>done
>a pull yet from remote. It was showing up in the logs on the website (it
>is not anymore). Maybe it
Hi,
While digging into MXML binding code, I discovered it was using
DescribeTypeCache class, which is still relying on the old describeType() XML
instead of the new describeTypeJSON()
Hopefully, it's only called in some specific binding situations, such as using
a Binding expression on non-bin
It looks like the root cause of my problem is my custom skin - using the
default skin removes the problem.
Still trying to figure out what is 'special' about my skin - will report
back once i know more...
On 10/10/2013 14:34, Gary Young wrote:
I have the same problem, it won't give any sta
I'm 99% sure we will be renaming and refactoring - just wanted to separate
the component sets. Here's an example:
MainView.mxml:
http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
xmlns:flexjs="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"
xmlns:local="*">
I have the same problem, it won't give any stack trace or any debug stop,
it's a stop shipping bug.
I will try to collect more information today.
-Gary
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Any chance" I meant to say .. that's what you get posting late at night
> a
There is some one with knowledge about this font format?
This is a web open font format a font "zipped" that is really normal for
browsers.
Benefits - less space in our swf- also possibility to manage the font online
(dynamic loaded)
I read some posts with some code that permit this reading but i
Hi,
"Any chance" I meant to say .. that's what you get posting late at night after
a glass of wine or two :-)
Justin
Hi,
any change you can provide a simple example that show this or a stack trace of
the error?
Thanks,
Justin
On 09/10/2013 19:33, Peter Ent wrote:
"staticControls". The intent of this package was to have controls that were
relatively simple and had direct or close approximation with HTML elements.
In which case I think the name is confusing. They are just as dynamic in
terms of data binding as the o
Its for desktop (actually for mobile too, but not tried that yet)
On 10/10/2013 12:28, Deepak MS wrote:
Is it for web or mobile? I had the same issue for mobile app.
interactionMode="touch" on datagrid solved the problem.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Lee Burrows
wrote:
Hi All,
I am atte
Hi Guys.
I've got serious problem with pasted text from MS excel's cell to spark
TextInput
Text in cell: 43091080566
Text after copy from excel's cell (ctrl + c): 43091080566\n
Text pasted to my TextInput
Screen: http://bit.ly/GQhoBv
I'm getting cutted text with additional line.
Anyon
My revert was on hash e3d52e485c1063a71d3682750ac0c2eb833f193a
submitted on 10/8/13 @ 12:15am according to my git history. I haven't done
a pull yet from remote. It was showing up in the logs on the website (it
is not anymore). Maybe it got clobbered during Justin's merge fix a few
hours after t
Is it for web or mobile? I had the same issue for mobile app.
interactionMode="touch" on datagrid solved the problem.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Lee Burrows
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am attempting to upgrade a flex app to the 4.10 sdk but i'm encountering
> an issue with the spark DataGrid.
>
Hi All,
I am attempting to upgrade a flex app to the 4.10 sdk but i'm
encountering an issue with the spark DataGrid.
My datagrid is displaying as if it has no data (a single column with an
empty header) but it does have horizontal and vertical scrollbars which
seem to be correctly sized for
Hi,
I have noticed mobile mustella tests on CalloutButton were excluded.
History of mustella1.properties says:
Peter Ent on 12/21/12: excluding Callout test suite due to missing source
files.
Is there a chance we can get these missing source file, so that the test suite
can be included again
After running the test again, I realize there is a bug in the existing code:
In
\flex-sdk\mustella\tests\mobile\SplitViewNavigator\integration\baselines\Callout_skin@android_240ppi.png
The thick red border surrounds the frame, but not the arrow.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12169005/Apach
Hi,
> The test doesn't seem to be setting htmlText to null, but I haven't stepped
> through it.
Doesn't doing this tf.text = txt also set htmlText to null?
> First, I want to figure out what went wrong with Git,
There's noting wrong with it - it's git? :-)
Thanks,
Justin
75 matches
Mail list logo
