If you open a browser and hit localhost, does it show you the mustella
files? Can you click on a SWF in the MarshallPlan folder and get it to
run?
I have to change two setting in https.conf, the DocumentRoot and Directory
tag both have the path to mustella/tests.
-Alex
On 12/18/13 11:17 PM, "Om
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Looks like there is no HTTP server for localhost:80 or localhost:8080?
>
There is a httpd server on localhost (on port 80) which points to
mustella/tests
Also, localhost:8080 is jenkins.
This is how Erik's VM is set up as well. Am I missing
Looks like there is no HTTP server for localhost:80 or localhost:8080?
On 12/18/13 5:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>We are very close to having a second VM up and running Mustella. Can
>someone help take a look at these errors?
>Almost all of them are timeout errors even after running a s
On 12/18/13 3:08 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Sorry Alex, I missed you proposition in the last email (this interleaved
>multithreaded discussions are a real pain...)
>
>> Right now, I'm thinking of:
>> 1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the
>> compile, a clean targ
On 12/18/13 2:47 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>Wow. I hate blurred images, especially when it's for legal reasons, and I
>think I will not do justice to the really nice app you made.
>But that's only a personal view.
>I really don't know what needs to be done.
>Maybe you should ask the person
To counter your point about commercial use never being fair use:; I'll
quote TechDirt (
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131125/10182325360/beastie-boys-say-they-dont-want-music-ads-fair-use-doesnt-care.shtml
) quoting a Supreme Court ruling (
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/
Fair Use is pretty limited in the USA, and is usually regarded in terms of
education or personal use. Advertisement is generally not allowed under
fair-use but again, that is something for the legal-beagles to
determine ;)
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
We are very close to having a second VM up and running Mustella. Can
someone help take a look at these errors?
Almost all of them are timeout errors even after running a second time.
Should we just run everything again and hope to see them go away?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:15 PM, w
Peter
Awesome, there's a particular post I wrote last week about writing from
ground up charts in canvas and javascript. You can use google translate for
that http://www.igorcosta.com/criando-graficos-zero-com-canvas-e-javascript/
Maybe help for next couple of charts.
--
Sorry Alex, I missed you proposition in the last email (this interleaved
multithreaded discussions are a real pain...)
> Right now, I'm thinking of:
> 1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the
> compile, a clean target that deletes the PBJ and a copy target that
> copie
The site is awfully slow at the moment, can't test anything...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 23:23
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Confluence upgrade
Hi,
Looks like the confluence upgrade has broken s
Hi,
> Right now, I'm thinking of:
> 1) adding a pixelbender.xml file with a main target that does the compile,
> a clean target that deletes the PBJ and a copy target that copies the PBJs
> into place in the sdk tree.
> 2) add more to the release notes that point you to this xml file
> 3) Separate
Wow. I hate blurred images, especially when it's for legal reasons, and I think
I will not do justice to the really nice app you made.
But that's only a personal view.
I really don't know what needs to be done.
Maybe you should ask the person you know at M6 (CTO ?) like what was suggested.
Mauric
Justin is right, anyway I didn't have the intention to veto the release ;-)
First of all, thanks Alex for the consideration you give to my position, given
that I am a newcomer to the team.
If you think that #1 (leave the files in place) is good solution, then go for
it.
I just would look to p
On 12/18/13 2:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Doing #1 appears to be the least work, but if you are going to veto the
>> release then I need to find some other configuration that will make you
>> happy.
>
>Releases can't be vetoed. They require 3+1's and more +1 than -1's. But
>the PMC
Maybe i can blur all the logos and pictures in screenshots, and maybe the title
can only talk about a « anonymous » French Social TV application ?
Erick
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 23:23, Maurice Amsellem a écrit
:
> Same in France : rights goes to the employer, IP depends, and you have the
> rights
Same in France : rights goes to the employer, IP depends, and you have the
rights to use "small quotations" (I guess that's what you call "fair use
provision") without permission.
There is another issue here:
If you look at the screenshots, there don't only show tv channels logos (which
belong
Hi,
Looks like the confluence upgrade has broken some of the styling:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Guidelines
Anyone have an idea of what needs to be fixed? I'd guess the images are just
missing?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Under US law there is also a fair use provision, which the showcase would
probably come under (and permission is not required), but it IMO always best to
ask.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Doing #1 appears to be the least work, but if you are going to veto the
> release then I need to find some other configuration that will make you
> happy.
Releases can't be vetoed. They require 3+1's and more +1 than -1's. But the PMC
does have a responsibility to the board that the releas
On 12/18/13 9:48 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>>
>>Well, I am making it a separate package. The question is whether you
>>think we should also move this code out of the flex-sdk repo.
>What does "separate package inside the flex-sdk" mean?
>is that a distinct and autonomous directory inside
Within the USA, if you do work-for-hire, the IP rights and everything
associated with it generally go to employer. That is, unless you expressly
reserve those rights.
Every country is different. Some of my customers are happy to have me tell
their story -- others don't want people to know who wo
On 12/18/13 12:22 PM, "Erick Ghaumez" wrote:
>As I¹ve said, the owner is « big » TV group, my contract is with a
>subsidiary company in charge of digital projects. I don¹t know if the one
>who signs my contract is legally authorized to give this permission. But
>if I understand, if he gives one,
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 17:45, Alex Harui a écrit :
>
>
> On 12/18/13 7:00 AM, "Erick Ghaumez" wrote:
>
>> I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
>> screenshots, it will be endless.
>> What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document
>> somewher
>I think it is too much effort for a few shaders. IMO, we should compile the
>pbk files and keep the binaries around till there is a need to change them.
>Pretty much what you have been doing for the past few days :-)
That pretty much my position, in more elegant and concise terms ;-)
-M
>I had a meeting with the engineer who wrote most of the PB compiler. He says
>that the PBK to PBJ pipeline shouldn't have dependencies on the gnu, but other
>PBK to XXX pipelines do, so it should be possible to modify the compiler and
>get rid of the window dependency.
I believe so, pbutil is
On Dec 18, 2013 9:07 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/13 6:59 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
> wrote:
>
> >>"Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and
> >>simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be
> >>simpler and gives us the option of reverting
Done. (bot update pending)
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.
Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
-Alex
On
On 12/18/13 6:59 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>>"Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and
>>simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be
>>simpler and gives us the option of reverting back to a single package
>>if we find that we can someday."
On 12/18/13 7:00 AM, "Erick Ghaumez" wrote:
>I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
>screenshots, it will be endless.
>What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document
>somewhere ?
>I can ask to the M6Web's CTO ( M6Web is the subsidiary com
Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.
Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
-Alex
On 12/18/13 8:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>I undestand.
>
>FYI, the app is already included in the showcase, as I read your email
>after.
>Shall I withdraw it temporarily while waiting for the legal st
I undestand.
FYI, the app is already included in the showcase, as I read your email after.
Shall I withdraw it temporarily while waiting for the legal stuff to be fixed.?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:33
À : d
IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait
to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
If you are a famous celebrity and happen to buy a particular brand of
clothing and someone sees you wearing it in public, folks can probably
tweet and Facebook that th
>Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
>shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
Also what I think. thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 déc
Nice!
Harbs
On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added a simple BarChart component to the ActionScript FlexJS SDK; it is
> modeled on the MX Charts package. I also included an example of using it,
> located in the FlexJS examples directory.
>
> I developed the BarChar
Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
-Mark
OK for me.
Also, can you include a small copyright notice in the description, something
like "M6, 6Ter, W9 and 6play are registered trademarks of ".
thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 16:0
I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
screenshots, it will be endless.
What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document somewhere ?
I can ask to the M6Web's CTO ( M6Web is the subsidiary company which is in
charge of digital projects ), but
>"Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply add
>new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be simpler and gives
>us the option of reverting back to a single package
>if we find that we can someday."
> Yeah. So what are your thoughts now?
- given
On 12/17/13 11:45 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>>Well, re-read the end of that thread and let me know where you stand.
>
>Alex wrote:
>"Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply
>add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be simpler
>and gives us
Thanks Alex,
I will then include the screenshots and the app in showcase.
We could then withdraw them easily in case someone complains.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 15:33
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Fl
We can ask on legal-discuss if you want to be certain, but I would guess
the answer is yes, we need permission from the owner. But Erick is
probably not wrong about the taking of screenshots either. My thought
experiment is this: If I was hired to paint the outside of a TV studio
with a particul
Thanks, Eric,
But Apache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for team
advice.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:39
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase lega
Hi,
i’m working on this project, and since it’s a public website, i think it’s
absolutly not illegal to display screenshots.
Erick
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 13:34, Maurice Amsellem a écrit
:
> Hi,
>
> A few app submissions (eg. "6play"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34005 ) are made
There are pros and cons for both options. I don't know at this point which one
is the better. Will have to try / test.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:33
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Fl
Hi,
A few app submissions (eg. "6play"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34005 ) are made by what looks like
developers sub-contracting for another company.
Do you think there is a legal issue to include these apps (eg. the screenshots)
without the permission of the owning company (m6
Well I was thinking of not having one large xml root file with everything.
Instead having the app listing with icons and lead in short description. Then
having the large descriptions, pics, url to owner page, app store url if any
stored in the sub-folder ...
-Mark
-Original Message---
This is true. The extra benefit of having the subfolder xml's will be able to
see the hits on each app view using just the website stats we have now.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:23 AM
To: dev@
Comments / rating is rather usual feature in sites that list submitted things
(apps, themes, ...) .
But as you said, managing the comments / rating would require more
infrastructure (DB, real server back-end, etc...) plus the spamming thing to
control.
So probably not feasible...
Maurice
--
> "So maybe text data (info on apps) could be stored in a simple xml file."
I guess that's the same thing as a catalogue file...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:20
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re:
Why not just a simple catalogue?
---
--
..
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote:
> Ok, so flex app loading an xml list from the server. So the last part is
> really about
I'd rather not get into the comments / rating thing. *.apache.org is a
pretty huge target for spammers and we shouoldn't have to make it
somebody's full time job to scrape all those -- esp. if they are tied to
some business which may then want to leave the showcase because of negative
or spammy com
Yes, something like that.
-Message d'origine-
De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:16
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Flex showcase
Ok, so flex app loading an xml list from the server. So the last part is
really about how
Ok, so flex app loading an xml list from the server. So the last part is
really about how to organize the data on the server. Folder for each app in
the showcase with a pics and another xml file that has the detail description
with the pic file listing.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From
I am not sure we could have BlazeDS equivalent on the apache web site.
So maybe text data (info on apps) could be stored in a simple xml file. Even
with hundreds of apps it shouldn't be that large.
And the images (screenshots) would be available as static resources, as it is
today, and loaded on
I like the flex app idea. The question is what do we have in the way of server
side to handle dynamic data requests and how are we going to store the data
-Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 5:58 AM
To
>But it does bring up the point of how we are going to organize the page
>someday to handle large amounts of entries.
- Maybe the showcase itself could be a Flex app, with tags, ranking/votes ,
comments, etc...
- we could split in mobile / desktop
(just ideas)
Maurice
-Message d'origine--
"Maybe when we have a few dozen entries, we can start being restrictive ;-)"
That sounds like a nice problem to have :). But it does bring up the point of
how we are going to organize the page someday to handle large amounts of
entries.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amselle
Well, yes, but your build script just needs to set the right one before
invoking the project ? You can keep the system default to be the 1.5 and
just change it for the session that invokes Flex.
I'm sure that it's harder than it sounds though, as always :-)
As Java 1.5 is now unsupported, and 1
59 matches
Mail list logo
