Will votes carry over?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> This is the discuss thread. Sorry for the churn.
>
> A missing JS file as added to this RC. Everything else is the same.
> There is no new FalconJX RC at this time.
>
> -Alex
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
J
This is the discuss thread. Sorry for the churn.
A missing JS file as added to this RC. Everything else is the same.
There is no new FalconJX RC at this time.
-Alex
Hi,
This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of Apache FlexJS.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.0.2/rc4/
Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
approving a release?", at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/
Sorry for the noise. Missing JS file was discovered.
On 7/10/14 12:04 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of Apache FlexJS.
>
>The release candidate can be found here;
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.0.2/rc3/
>
>Before voting please
On 7/9/14 11:46 PM, "Glenn Willianms" wrote:
>Can anyone point me to a 'very up to date' overview of where we are now
>and
>help get me back up to speed?
Here's a link to a draft of the June report. There were a few minor edits
after before a final copy was sent to the board.
http://markmail.o
nl_NL: Installeer Apache Flex SDK {0} voor het gebruik in uw IDE
EdB
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:15 AM, João Fernandes <
joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, currently there is an invalid translation for the key INFO_WINDOW_TITLE
> for the installer
> The current english text is "I
Hi, currently there is an invalid translation for the key INFO_WINDOW_TITLE
for the installer
The current english text is "Install Apache Flex SDK {0} for use with your
IDE" and we need someone to translate to the 3 missing locales.
Thanks
--
João Fernandes
Erik,
The content in the two branches are exactly the same, but the new branch is
composed by clean commits only, without any merge-commit in their change set.
In your current branch, we have a serie of merge-commit in order to maintain
the branch updated. Each of those commits contain all chan
Hmm. You don't need to overlay anything if you aren't using an IDE.
That's why we can run all these ant scripts.
To use an IDE, you need to overlay Falcon in order for the IDE to use
Falcon instead of MXMLC. I've never tried to get FB to use FalconJX
instead of MXMLC. It would probably be a chu
Jose,
What is the difference between the 'experimental/VF2JS' and 'VF2JS' remote
branches?
EdB
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jose Barragan <
jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Sorry about that, you're right.
>
> But after read the atlassian's article, I supposed that I h
Rebase and merge both make sense depending on the situation. No need to
have a hard and fast rule about it.
This conversation is moot if folks don't understand Git properly. Let's
give it time, no point in forcing this new.
Thanks,
Om
On Jul 10, 2014 9:19 AM, "Jose Barragan"
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
Hi Erik,
Sorry about that, you're right.
But after read the atlassian's article, I supposed that I hasn't any good
reason to maintain the proposal alive, because seems as simply is one of two
main flavours of work with git, even I keep on thinking that is the best, but
maybe is just my point
+1
- sigs good
- builds fine
- /examples/DataBindingTest builds fine, and runs as expected (SWF and both
debug and release JS)
Nice work!
EdB
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of Apache FlexJS.
>
> The release candidate
Hi Erik,
I was only answering the 2 previous emails, nothing relative to what you or
Jose did because I hadn't got a look at it but from what it wrote, he just
updated your Branch from what has been done in develop, doing so, you can
continue to work knowing that what others did on the develop b
Alex,
I tried to get FalconJX to work from this release. I couldn't. Best I could
do, after running 'ant' on compiler.jx, was where I get the messages like
this one: "CSS codegen problem. Reason: 'Unable to find compilation unit
for Embed(source="Assets.swf",symbol="mx.skins.cursor.DragLink")." A
Jose,
I'm not sure why you just now deleted the new branch you created? Like with
your creation of it, that seems very sudden. I may still decide that your
way is the way to go, but I need to understand first what I was doing
wrong, and how your method is a better workflow.
Everyone else,
I'm ju
+1
- sigs good
- build completes successfully
- Falcon builds correctly functioning SWF from vf2js_DataBindingTest
Note:
- the 'ApproveFalcon' script failed, complaining my ASJS_HOME prop wasn't
set, when an 'echo $ASJS_HOME' proved it wrong.
- I cannot build a JS release, as FalconJX is not buil
I'm with you @Jose and @Frederick. I remember that we was learning how to
use GIT when Frederik wrote that article. and I think its the way to go.
Many positive things, but as always it requires people to want to
understand "the git way". But if you try, you'll never go back.
2014-07-10 16:53 GMT
"If you and your team are not familiar with, or don’t understand the
intricacies of rebase, then you probably shouldn’t use it. In this context,
always merge is the safest option."
That's what happen here despite my efforts to explain when and how to use
"rebase" over "merge" (see the wiki) and
Hi Justin,
Under the new light from this article, I have anything else to say.
Clearly I’m a rebase guy, over all, after suffering at our company the
extremely complexity that we reached by using only the merge way.
Well, as I told to @Erik, if my proposal didn't like it or didn't was candidat
Hi,
> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria based on
> best practices of git.
Sorry but iMO it's not best practices, its just that a vocal group of git users
think this it's the way to do things(tm) but other git users think otherwise.
We also need to remember th
Sorry, just created an account with mih...@apache.org. Instead of
credentials, I just need permission to edit. Thanks!
On 10 July 2014 12:09, Mihai Chira wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> could someone set me up with confluence[1] credentials?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mihai
>
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
Shall we update this wiki page[1] about our source code (and
potentially others)?
I'm happy to do it as part of making my first commit. If you have a
link to a discussion thread or other wiki page with more info about
the transition to git, please let me know.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
Hi,
could someone set me up with confluence[1] credentials?
Thanks,
Mihai
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
hehe :-)
2014-07-10 11:50 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton :
> Took longer though :-)
>
> Tom
>
> On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> > Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;)
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton :
> >
> >> It was so much easier with SVN...
> >>
> >> To
Took longer though :-)
Tom
On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;)
>
>
> 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton :
>
>> It was so much easier with SVN...
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote:
>>> Hi Erik,
>>>
>>> Nothing is
Thanks Chris,
Regarding your recommendation Chris, follow this link to see it on UDemy:
https://curiosity.com/courses/mccullough-and-berglund-on-mastering-git-udemy
__
Jose Barragan
Senior Software Engineer
Codeoscopic
+34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
On 10 Jul 2
Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;)
2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton :
> It was so much easier with SVN...
>
> Tom
>
> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote:
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria
> based on best practic
Usually there is a tight correlation between such statements and the lack of
GIT knowledge.
Sort of like the amount of the usage of the word "stupid" in scentances where
somebody is talking about Maven ;-)
And while noone will probably want to go back to Ant as soon as he has really
understood
It was so much easier with SVN...
Tom
On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria based on
> best practices of git.
>
> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches updated
> using a commit m
Hi Glenn,
nice to see you back again here. You've traveled to the gates of hell to
see what's going on and have survived to return.
You are lucky hehe :)
2014-07-10 8:46 GMT+02:00 Glenn Willianms :
> HI all
>
>
>
> I'm back working with flex after 18 months having to write a couple of
> javaSc
Hi Erik,
Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria based on
best practices of git.
Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches updated
using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t it?. Well, this
practice cause a big complex
This is the discussion thread.
The changes in this RC are in the installer downloading Google Closure
Library from GH via the sdk-installer-config.xml file, and a change to all
view beads to allow the view to dictate the default height of the
component. We used to just rely on the DisplayObject b
Hi,
This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of Apache FlexJS.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.0.2/rc3/
Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
approving a release?", at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/
Hi,
This is vote for the second (0.0.2) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon)
compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at
this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as
upstream packages for the FlexJS release.
The release candidate can be found
This is the discussion thread.
The changes to this RC are related to using the latest Google Closure
Compiler and Google Closure Library.
Votes will carry over.
-Alex
36 matches
Mail list logo
