+1
On 29 Aug 2014 04:25, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > And I swear...if need be I will tear apart all the flex
> > releases and rebuild one which has the DESIGN VIEW, and put that sh!t on
> > pirate bay.
>
> Assuming the issue was in the SDK you are free to do that. The Apache
> licence all
Doesn't that create a dependency on category x?
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
> I'm wondering if any of the dictionaries have no GPL components. If we
> can't find one that does, that may mean that Squiggly cannot be its own
> release packa
Hi,
This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 1. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the
README.
Changes from the last version:
- Added asdocs
- Merged READMEs / added instructions on how to use Squiggly
- Removed demo and scripts as they are missing needed dictionaries
- Fixed LICENSE
- Change default
Hi,
Please place all of the discussion here rather than in the vote thread.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Several minor issues exist so I'll fix and make another RC.
Justin
Hi,
>> Well it's a SWC isn't it?
>
> Several swcs - look in the libs directory.
>
>> Eventually all we have to do is write a pom with it's dependencies and an
>> Apache header, repo, license block etc and manually stage that RC in the
>> staging repo.
>
> Just the swcs or the code as well? G
Hi,
> I'm wondering if any of the dictionaries have no GPL components. If we
> can't find one that does, that may mean that Squiggly cannot be its own
> release package.
From a brief look I couldn't find one, so for now I think we just need to point
people in the right direction.
Thanks,
Justi
Hi,
>>> 1. There are two README files, one here [1] and one under the 'main'
>>> directory after unzipping the src/binary kit. We should merge those two,
>>> to avoid confusion.
Done
>>> 5. The apps under main/Demo/ does not seem to work
Until we can package a dictionary I've removed them fr
Hi,
> And I swear...if need be I will tear apart all the flex
> releases and rebuild one which has the DESIGN VIEW, and put that sh!t on
> pirate bay.
Assuming the issue was in the SDK you are free to do that. The Apache licence
allows you to take Apache code, modify it and republish it, so tha
Hi,
> One thing I want to be crystal clear about, is that the *DESIGN VIEW* needs
> to be adopted in Apache Flex.
Design view is part of Flash Builder and wasn't part of the donation by Adobe
to Apache. There's not a lot we can do about that.
While not optimal - you can still use the designer i
Hi,
> I am wondering how Hunspell is integrated here? Was it a port from C++ to
> AS3?
I'm not 100% sure but from whatI can tell the AS version supports Hunspell
dictionaries, and the ANE version (not in this release) uses Hunspell. I don't
think there's a port of Hunspell in the current relea
>Applications that rely on pixel perfect text layout can not use the
>browser DOM because most everything in the browser world it is
>dependent on what browser and OS you use. This has led companies like
>Prezi, who is trying to get off FP, to use Emscripten for HarfBuzz in
>the browser then t
I've been using the technology since release 2.0. And, I have the full time
job of releasing dozens of applications every year since, maintaining a user
base of 40,000+ users across the country.
One thing I want to be crystal clear about, is that the *DESIGN VIEW* needs
to be adopted in Apache Fle
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. There are two README files, one here [1] and one under the 'main'
> > directory after unzipping the src/binary kit. We should merge those two,
> > to avoid confusion.
> Can do.
>
Thanks!
>
> > 2. LICENSE file is incomplete
-1 just because the final license wasn't in the kit and we need to figure
out the dictionary dependencies. Otherwise, good enough for a 1.0.
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.0/rc0/apache-flex-sq
uiggly-1.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5
Source kit si
Hi Joel,
Long time ago, someone mentioned this project: http://lightspark.github.io
I have no idea if it will help you or not.
Regarding FlexJS, in these early days, we are punting on pixel-perfect
text. I have hope that someday, a few dedicated volunteers will take a
shot at pixel-perfect text'
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -1 Binding
> Which issues do you think are actual blockers?
>
>
1, 2 and 5.
Thanks,
Om
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
Thanks for the reply Mike. Sorry I didn't realize how well documented the
"open source parts of Flash" argument is.
Applications that rely on pixel perfect text layout can not use the browser
DOM because most everything in the browser world it is dependent on what
browser and OS you use. This has
On 8/28/14 4:54 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> When I was prepping the donation, I was thinking we'd send folks to
>> Hunspell to get their dictionaries.
>
>Open Office extensions may be a better option being an Apache project?
>Looks like if you unziip an OO dictionary you get the files
Hi,
> What licence ? Can we just fork it ?
It's MPL I believe which is weak copy left so there's some issues there in
regards to Apche bundling.
Thanks,
Justin
Some news regarding the work in progress here [1].
[1] http://flashdevelop.org/community/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=11879
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/New-public-Flex-related-campaign-tp39682p40201.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mai
On 28/08/14 14:21, Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz wrote:
> The project is open sourced at sourceforge, but it seems that it's fading
> away slowly.
What licence ? Can we just fork it ?
Tom
That's exactly what I asked one month ago in this list. Former osmf.org now
redirects to http://blogs.adobe.com/osmf/ and it hasn't been updated in 2
years.
It seems unsupported, considering that there're bugs out there been marked
as "NotEnoughTime", so it'd nice Adobe donates it to Apache.
The
Hi,
> -1 Binding
Which issues do you think are actual blockers?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Well it's a SWC isn't it?
Several swcs - look in the libs directory.
> Eventually all we have to do is write a pom with it's dependencies and an
> Apache header, repo, license block etc and manually stage that RC in the
> staging repo.
Just the swcs or the code as well? Given this is r
Hi,
> When I was prepping the donation, I was thinking we'd send folks to
> Hunspell to get their dictionaries.
Open Office extensions may be a better option being an Apache project? Looks
like if you unziip an OO dictionary you get the files you need.
> We could provide links, or maybe the
>
Well it's a SWC isn't it?
A mavenized form isn't a different release, it's more an additional location
for placing the released binaries.
Eventually all we have to do is write a pom with it's dependencies and an
Apache header, repo, license block etc and manually stage that RC in the
staging r
Hi,
> As we noticed with FlexUnit that simply releasing Maven artifacts of a
> previously released library isn't that easy (From Apache procedures ... the
> releasing itself is easy), I think we should think about releasing the maven
> artifacts together with the normal release.
So how do we r
Hi,
> 1. There are two README files, one here [1] and one under the 'main'
> directory after unzipping the src/binary kit. We should merge those two,
> to avoid confusion.
Can do.
> 2. LICENSE file is incomplete (there is a TODO section in there)
Git issue and it's been fixed, there's no addit
Hi gouravflex,
Everything what you need you can find at official web site of Apache Flex.
http://flex.apache.org/
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS
On the website you will find installer for installing FlexJS, SDK source
files for building it on your own and many other help
As we noticed with FlexUnit that simply releasing Maven artifacts of a
previously released library isn't that easy (From Apache procedures ... the
releasing itself is easy), I think we should think about releasing the maven
artifacts together with the normal release.
Chris
___
-1 Binding
See details in the [DISCUSS] thread.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
> - packages name etc good
> - LICENSE needs to be double checked by someone else but at the moment I
> can't seen anything that need to be added to the sta
MD5 and signature looks good.
Compiles fine
I see some issues:
1. There are two README files, one here [1] and one under the 'main'
directory after unzipping the src/binary kit. We should merge those two,
to avoid confusion.
2. LICENSE file is incomplete (there is a TODO section in there)
3.
Please reply for my below querys?
How FlexJS will work?
How Much stuff for flex dev to learn flex JS and how many features of flex
will support flexJs?
Is there any time line for stable version of flexjs?
and most imp from where i can get sdk or dev kit of flex js?
--
View this message in conte
When I was prepping the donation, I was thinking we'd send folks to
Hunspell to get their dictionaries. We could provide links, or maybe the
ant script can offer to fetch one (with notification of license
differences first).
BTW, I ran out of time tonight to look at the RC. I'll look in my morni
35 matches
Mail list logo
