On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending on
>what others are doing.
>
>Should we ask for a Flex track here as well?
Don't we have
+1 Binding
Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
MD5 checksum matches
Good signature
Source kit build successful
Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls.
Build successful.
Flash Builder likes the new SDK.
Recompiled existing large
TLF Rendering speed was improved.
On 1/7/16, 5:04 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>+1 Binding
>
>Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
>MD5 checksum matches
>Good signature
On 1/7/16, 5:24 PM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> How many of you use the "as" keyword as part of a test?
>
>
>I have a huge code base and I use "as" / "is" everywhere (
I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending on
what others are doing.
Should we ask for a Flex track here as well?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well I'm currently building a little robot. On
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending on
> >what
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> How many of you use the "as" keyword as part of a test?
I have a huge code base and I use "as" / "is" everywhere (
https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave). My code depends on it behaving the
same way it does in ActionScript.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I
> >>
On 1/7/16, 2:11 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>There are times when I consider it convenient to use "as" for casting and
>check for null, but it's not frequently. Usually, I use "is" instead. Most
>of the time, I use the other form of casting that results in a runtime
>error
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/6/16, 11:36 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Add the following as the ASDoc for the WebProject1() method, then it
>
Hi,
Well I'm currently building a little robot. On that I'll be running BlazeDS to
communicate with a Mobile App ... hopefully I'll be finished with the hardware
part in a Week or so. As soon as that's done I'll submit some Mobile, IoT
related talk to the "ApacheCon NA - Core". If that talk is
Hi Josh
I agree ... that's totally not good .. and common': "tires and heaters" the
company just selling anything they can get their hands on?
Chris
Von: Josh Tynjala
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 15:04
An:
If you are windows you could include a command line option for a taskkill [1]
if you have any scripts running.
[1] taskkill /F /IM java.exe
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: dhwanishah85 [mailto:dhwanisha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 7:02 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
If you remove the www, it should load properly. They seem to using a
modified version of the Apache Flex logo with the "Apache" text removed.
- Josh
On Jan 7, 2016 5:51 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
> That site does not load for me.
>
> Tom
>
> On 06/01/16 23:04, Igor Costa
+1 binding
-Successful build from source.
-Successfully compiled small test applications.
-README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE fine.
OS: Win7 64bit
Java: 1.8 64bit.
IDE: FlashDevelop 5.0.2
Flash Player: 20
-
-Mark
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:04 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
That's odd. I swear I remember someone from Adobe once explaining that
function-style casting is faster than as-style casting (with the exception
of primitive types that have a top level function that makes function-style
casting impossible, as you mentioned in 1). I've tried to avoid as-style
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote:
> That's odd. I swear I remember someone from Adobe once explaining that
> function-style casting is faster than as-style casting (with the exception
> of primitive types that have a top level function that makes
I was referring function casting when I talked about the runtime error that
occurs when it fails. I use that type of casting very frequently.
- Josh
On Jan 7, 2016 5:27 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
> On 1/7/16, 2:11 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> >There
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> If "SomeType(somevar)" is not in a try/catch it will throw an exception.
> How often are you relying on that vs just trying to make the compiler
> happy?
>
"function" casting is slower than "as" in ActionScript, so I have
Interesting side note. As I understand it, try-catch is no longer expensive
in the case where no error is thrown. I explained to someone why I didn't
want to use a try-catch in some performance critical code, and I cited
Jackson Dunstan's article. They ran the benchmark from the article in a
newer
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #159 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/159/.
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #160 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/160/.
Way back in the day, I was told that "Function" casting was faster, and
you'll see almost as much of it as "as" casting in the Flex SDK source. I
ran a test on my Mac using FP20 standalone and for 5,000,000 iterations
"function" casting is only 14ms slower than "as" casting so I'm not sure
it
+0 Binding
Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65"
MD5 checksum matches
Good signature
Source kit build successful
Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
Flash Builder
Hi,
> I'll be able to vote on it tonight, one of dev boxes is down for the count.
> Has anything change since I looked at the 4.15 nightly?
There would of been couple of minor changes.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> As I mentioned in the VOTE thread, the build is successful.
> But when I ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
> successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
> Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and
>
As I mentioned in the VOTE thread, the build is successful.
But when I ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build
successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but
Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' and
AIR version 16.0
Next item:
I’m working on namespaces and QNames.
E4X allows the specification of default namespaces like this:
default xml namespace = "http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009”;
This causes all elements created after this statement to act as if they were
declared like this:
How many of you use the "as" keyword as part of a test? IOW things like:
var foo:SomeType = someVar as SomeType;
if (foo == null)
IMO, I have yet to use "as" in this way in the FlexJS framework. I just
use it to make the compiler happy. IOW things like:
var foo:SomeType = someVar as
I personally always use “is” for type-testing. I’ve always considered using
“as” and null testing as counter-intuitive.
I only use “as” for type casting to make the compiler happy.
I’m fine with switching it if there’s reason to do so.
On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:55 PM, Alex Harui
There are times when I consider it convenient to use "as" for casting and
check for null, but it's not frequently. Usually, I use "is" instead. Most
of the time, I use the other form of casting that results in a runtime
error when the cast fails. I hope that runtime error won't be removed. Or
at
On 1/7/16, 12:56 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>>
>> I recall this seeing something similar before (previous version) and I
>> think the issue was that the using an OS X made SDK on Windows. The
>>scripts
>>
Hi,
> How would I check and confirm if this is indeed the casel?
You’ll have bin/adl.exe and bin/adt.exe rather than bin/adl and bin/adt.
At a guess try:
ant thirdparty-clean
ant -f installer.xml air-download
And see which of the air download targets it runs. (air-setup-win or
air-setup-mac)
33 matches
Mail list logo