Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as soon as you
check it in.
Any chance you can bring in d3.js as well? This looks like a good source:
https://github.com/federico-b/d3-externs
On that note, there is an extern file generator available here:
http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as soon as you
> check it in.
>
>
Waiting on Alex to take care of some stuff, but anybody that wants to try
it, jquery and svg are in this SWC.
http://www.teotigraphix.com/asse
Yes, you continue to amaze. FWIW, I think Jquery should be in its own
swc. What do others think? Svg would go in js.swc since all browser we
care about have these APIs, but the JS-framework-specific externs should
probably have their own swc.
Thoughts?
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 12:42 PM, "OmPrakash M
I agree, but I am just throwing crap at the wall right now. :)
Mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yes, you continue to amaze. FWIW, I think Jquery should be in its own
> swc. What do others think? Svg would go in js.swc since all browser we
> care about have these APIs
Om, I am looking at d3, looks pretty impressive, what modules would you be
using. They have good API and I could create a base externs file pretty
quick.
Mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I agree, but I am just throwing crap at the wall right now. :)
>
> Mike
>
> O
I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of the
same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here:
https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/API-Reference
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Om, I am looking at d3, look
So Alex, you have any idea how to handle the external jQuery? You want me
just to write another unit test that builds it for now like I am doing with
JS.swc?
Also, the build I will commit my stuff when you are done with your build
commits.
Mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppiral
I was just looking at EXTERNC.java to try to figure out if that is
supposed to be used to create these SWCs. I would rather build the SWCs
in the main build instead of via unit tests so other folks can get a
cleaner idea of how to create other SWCs. Is EXTERNC the correct client
for this?
-Alex
Well, it was a stub really and it compiles the js and generates the as. But
yeah, I can't see why COMPC can't be called right after that just like in
the tests.
It's complicated though, dependencies of the js and compiler. SO "right
now" I probably need to really test how additional libraries are
OK, I’m going to try to use EXTERNC from Ant to build JS.swc.
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 1:55 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Well, it was a stub really and it compiles the js and generates the as.
>But
>yeah, I can't see why COMPC can't be called right after that just like in
>the tests.
>
>It's complic
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of the
> same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here:
> https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/API-Reference
>
Well I looked at this, I really
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >
> wrote:
>
> > I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all part of
> the
> > same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from here:
> > https://gi
Yeah, I am probably going to leave this stuff to to other people if they so
choose. :) I could eventually parse that one to get something going though.
Mike
BTW the jQuery will end up in separate SWC sooner than later.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1
Mike,
It looks like EXTERNC needs to handle command-line arguments, correct? I
will try to get that working. I am planning on using the same
Configurator that MXMLJSC and COMPJSC use unless you can think of a reason
not to.
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 3:57 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Yeah, I am pro
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Michael Schmalle <
teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >
> wrote:
>
> > Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as soon as you
> > check it in.
> >
> >
> Waiting on Alex to take care of some s
I just clicked on it and the save as popup came up in Firefox.
Mike
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:13 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosma...@gm
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I just clicked on it and the save as popup came up in Firefox.
>
>
Got it!
Thanks,
Om
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:13 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> > teotigraph
OK, I got EXTERNC handling CLI and building a js.swc from Ant. Will
integrate it into the build over the weekend, but I think I am out of
Mike’s way now. Then I will try Jquery externs in its own SWC unless
someone beats me to it.
-Alex
On 6/18/15, 4:46 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Mike,
>
>It lo
ava:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running,
elegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorIm
>pl.java:43)
>at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>at
>org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106
>)
>
>
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>--------
g.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106)
>
>
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nig
I did ant clean-all, all
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:37:51 +
>
&
;>> at
>>>org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292)
>>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor
>>>Im
>>>pl.java:43)
OMAS
>>
>>
>>--------
>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>>>we now have 1.9 in AS
>>> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015
/20/15, 6:41 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>>
>>>I did ant clean-all, all
>>>
>>>
>>>Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>
>>>----------------
>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> Subject:
.@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:17:51 +
>
> Great! Basically, there is a js-compile-config.xml that EXTERNC is told
> to use to generate a b
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------------------
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:17:51 +
> &
I
> just listed, let me know if you get it building.
Yes, maybe I can try and ask when a problem will occur :-)
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
----
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:56:13 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare b
and what I
> just listed, let me know if you get it building.
Yes, maybe I can try and ask when a problem will occur :-)
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
--------
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:56:13 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a ni
there is a js-compile-config.xml that EXTERNC is told
>>>> to use to generate a bunch of AS files from the .js files listed in
>>>> js-compile-config.xml. Then COMPC runs and uses compile-config.xml to
>>>> generate the SWC. If I were working on it, I would
externs do
> > and I haven't even thought about that problem since JS.SWC is already
> > created, the prototypes can't be added to.
> >
> > Anyway, I think you can get it going by following what Alex said and
> what I
> > just listed, let me know if you get it bui
On 6/20/15, 8:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>What happens if you try to compile an external that does this that is not
>part of the JS.swc build? Well for one, it won't be added because the
>Window class is already compiled into the JS.swc.
>
>So for now, it's important that we add all exter
But won't you start to have conflicts if you wanted other libraries that
used mixins?
Mike
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/20/15, 8:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >What happens if you try to compile an external that does this that is not
> >part of the JS.s
dClassToFunction(val);
}
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:52:00 +
>
>
&
Deferred
> jQuery.deferred
> jQuery.Event
> jQuery.Deferred
> $.Event
> $.Deferred
> $.deferred
>
>
>
>
> I had to create:
>
> @Config(allowMultiple = true)
> @Mapping("classToFunction")
> @InfiniteArguments
> p
s my jquery-config-xml:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> true
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> src
>>
>>
>> false
>>
>>
>>
>> externs/jquery-1.9.js
>>
>>
>> out/as
>>
>>
>> $
>>
&g
gt;>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.requests.RequestMaker$1.call(RequestMaker.java:222)
> >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> >> at
> >>
> j
t; Just for sake of consistency, you might want to rename;
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > to
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Done
>>
>> > You are using jquery-1.9.js right?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> > That should be exc
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:16:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> I'm test
you might want to rename;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > to
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> Done
>>>
>>> > You are using jquery-1.9.js right?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> > That shou
e asRoot is null despite I set out/as
>
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> --------
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:16:00 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotig
-0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> staticMainNoExit() has to be called to create the configuration correctly.
>
> And yes, that NPE means there is no c
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:23:25 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > staticMainNoExit() has
THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ------------------------
>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:23:25 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>> we now have 1.9 in AS
>> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
>> >
e main()
>>> which call staticMainNoExit()
>>>
>>>
>>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:23:25 -0400
>>> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up a
; >
>>>> >> Should be something missing because the config seem not to be set,
>>>> the
>>>> >> first exception is
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
>&
, I bet
>>>> you that is what is going on.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> How is EXTERNC
possibly undefined method $.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------------------
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:51:15 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > F
>> });
>>
>> Error:(18, 8) [testJsSwc]: Call to a possibly undefined method $.
>> Warning:(18, 26) [testJsSwc]: return value for function '' has no type
>> declaration.
>> Error:(19, 12) [testJsSwc]: Call to a possibly undefined method $.
&
ert() referenced as a function in js.swc.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:49:49 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev
>>> compiler will not return a config if there is an internal error, so
> >> that is
> >>>>> why the NPE would happen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Mic
xample, alert() referenced as a function in js.swc.
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> --------------------
>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:49:49 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>&g
neither as a function in jquery.swc
>>> but I can see, for example, alert() referenced as a function in js.swc.
>>>
>>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:49:49 -0400
>>> > Subject:
gt;> global function, can verify this?
>>>>
>>>> I've been checking in ReferenceModel and it took the right code path.
>>>> I can't see $ referenced as a class neither as a function in jquery.swc
>>>> but I can see, for example, ale
s file is $() at you ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:20:04 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> &
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ------------------------
>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:20:04 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>> we now have 1.9 in AS
>> > From: teotigraphix...@gmai
he previous error has been fixed, I re-added it and the $() is now
>>> emitted but when I compile the test app, I can't find it in the output js
>>> files and the debugger tells me it can't find $()
>>>
>>> In what produced js file is $() at you ?
>>&g
an idea of why it is not emitted at me ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------------------
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:43:28 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teot
n an
>> application, the emitted js doesn't contain any reference of $() and the
>> application doesn't work, is it working at you when you use $() in an
>> application ? and in what js file is it referenced ? and even, have you got
>> an idea of why it is not emitted at me ?
>>
>> Fr
:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> And emitted JS
>
> ...
>
> /**
> * @constructor
> */
> Main = function()
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:54:43 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > And emitted JS
> >
>
have to build into the compile
> config or something, ideas?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ------------------------
>> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 17:54:43 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
>> we now ha
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:18:10 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Fred, what I did for the temp is just have the HTML file in a different
> d
Tomorrow I will try with another one given this one is ok now.
>
> Cheers.
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:18:10 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9
l don't know where the code is :-)
>>
>> I let you for tonight, thanks again and enjoy what you are doing ;-)
>>
>> Tomorrow I will try with another one given this one is ok now.
>>
>> Cheers.
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> -------------
t; Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:27:08 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.or
With pleasure Mike with your help I learn something !
And no idea what's a ADHT :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:55:03 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.
; Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:55:03 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > Kewl man, thank
On 6/20/15, 3:12 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Btw, is there a way to have a template for the index.html to not to have
>manually include this script tag after each build ?
Hey Fred,
Thanks for figuring out jquery.swc.
FlexJS uses the MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java which uses GoogDepsWriter.
GoogD
On 6/20/15, 10:08 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>But won't you start to have conflicts if you wanted other libraries that
>used mixins?
Yes, if you have a stack of swcs each trying to modify a class definition
in incompatible ways, then our current compiler won’t like it.
Now it is currently
mbark such feature ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 05:24:35 +
>
>
&g
-------
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 05:24:35 +
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/20/15, 3:12 PM, "
On 6/22/15, 2:14 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> > FlexJS uses the MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java which uses GoogDepsWriter.
>> > GoogDepsWriter scans the .js files for an tag and adds
>>that
>> > to the index.html. Not quite sure ho
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/15, 2:14 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > FlexJS uses the MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java which uses GoogDepsWriter.
> >> > GoogDepsWriter scans the .js fil
y.min.js',
type='text/javascript')]
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:22:
Mike,
One question - Is there any possibility to have an list of all classes/api
which you currently put inside JS.swc ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-FlexJS-JQuery-up-and-r
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Mike,
>
> One question - Is there any possibility to have an list of all classes/api
> which you currently put inside JS.swc ?
>
Actually I was going to try and hack an asdoc build target or something. I
hate ANT, seriously people, I am compiler,
Thank you Mike.
I just wanted to mention about JS.swc on some Polish forums.
Maybe someone will be interested to try it out FlexJS and so on. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Falcon
Yeah and don't forget about the jquery.swc as well, it's not perfect right
now but does add most of the core functionality of 1.9, which reading the
extern file is the same as 2.0, so the API should work with query 2.0 as
well.
Mike
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:44 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Thank you Mik
BTW, I can almost say for certain that pretty much ALL API in the browser
is supported, DOM 1,2,3, webkit, gecko, extensions, webgl, SVG, css, css3d,
window and a bunch of others, it's a HUGE amount of API in that swc.
Mike
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Yeah and don
Won't forget and I will post about that tomorrow. Going to bed right now - it
is really late in Poland. :)
Thank you Mike.
Have a nice day. :)
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-FlexJS-J
Putting some links to the api could make for sure good impression, but even
if we don't have it for now no worry. :)
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-FlexJS-JQuery-up-and-running-a-nig
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:53 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Putting some links to the api could make for sure good impression, but even
> if we don't have it for now no worry. :)
>
>
>
Is it kosher if I put them temporarily on my server if I got them
generated? Or is there some other place they can be uploa
I think every committer has his own space on Apache. Sometimes Alex is
putting there something and provide links, but I have never used it.
You have probably your own space, so putting there this files would the
best.
Maybe someone can help on this ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...
All committers have space at people.apache.org. It requires SSH and/or
SCP. I can’t think of any reason you can’t post temporary stuff on your
own servers. The nightly builds are hosted on my Azure box.
-Alex
On 6/22/15, 3:00 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>I think every committer has his own space on
Also, if you have a github account, it's a breeze to set up personal pages:
https://www.thinkful.com/learn/a-guide-to-using-github-pages/
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> All committers have space at people.apache.org. It requires SSH and/or
> SCP. I can’t think
On 6/22/15, 2:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> I’ve been pondering what the packaging options might be. Right now folks
>> are getting things to run because after we cross-compile the AS to JS,
>> Google Closure Library classes are mixed in in order to get scripts
>> loaded, and an index.html
Thanks Alex.
Mike,
I have created pure AS3 application in intellij with the freshest FlexJS and
what's next ? I don't see any classes like HTMLDivElement or SVGElement.
Should I add manually references to js.swc and jquery.swc to see that and
get compiled ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrza
On Jun 22, 2015 10:14 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>
> Thanks Alex.
>
> Mike,
>
> I have created pure AS3 application in intellij with the freshest FlexJS
and
> what's next ? I don't see any classes like HTMLDivElement or SVGElement.
> Should I add manually references to js.swc and jquery.swc to see that a
On 6/22/15, 9:52 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Thanks Alex.
>
>Mike,
>
>I have created pure AS3 application in intellij with the freshest FlexJS
>and
>what's next ? I don't see any classes like HTMLDivElement or SVGElement.
>Should I add manually references to js.swc and jquery.swc to see that and
>get
Thanks Om.
I did similar thing but just wondered whether my path doing that is ok. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-FlexJS-JQuery-up-and-running-a-nightmare-but-we-now-have-1
Piotr,
Just remember those swc need to be added as external dependency.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:05:26 -0700
> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up an
Fred,
Saying "external dependency" you mean adding it in Modules -> New Library...
?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-FlexJS-JQuery-up-and-running-a-nightmare-but-we-now-have-1-
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:55:47 -0700
> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
>
> Fred,
>
> Saying "ex
I had even a version using setInterval t ocheck if
window["jQuery"] was present and it was), if instead I add a script tag with
the src attribute pointing to JQuery, it works.
Frédéric THOMAS
------------------------
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.
the init function doesn't work despite the lib has been
> loaded (to be sure I had even a version using setInterval t ocheck if
> window["jQuery"] was present and it was), if instead I add a script tag with
> the src attribute pointing to JQuery, it works.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> --
what you are
saying, "an new language feature", for the loading of scripts and
dependencies?
Mike
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [Fa
On 6/23/15, 5:44 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>wrote:
>
>> It worked, it was just because I didn't know well how to use jQuery in
>> that context, so, I will create utility classes to deal with
>>downloading of
>> scripts and css if no one see
dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now
> have 1.9 in AS
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:07:12 +
>
>
>
> On 6/23/15, 5:44 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Frédéric
On 6/23/15, 8:53 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>Playing with the externs, we've seen that in order to customize our
>index.html (adding a Script tag for JQuery for example) we had to create
>another index.html outside the build folder referencing our main .js
>because the original one was overr
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
