monitoring ASF service status

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
If ever you wonder that ASF services might not be responding, then browse to http://www.apache.org/dev/ and see the link "Public Host & Service Status". This is particularly useful if ever the mail servers are in trouble. The ASF infrastructure@ people know about any issues, through alerts to IRC,

Re: [testing] RC1 testing results

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
Tim Williams wrote: > I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw were: > > -- Tab not highlighting > I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that > clicking on the "Versioned Docs" tab doesn't highlight that tab -- > meaning you click on it and ess

Re: versioned plugin docs (Was: svn commit: r190111)

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >David Crossley wrote: > > > >>Summarising ... > >> > >>http://f.a.o/docs_0_60/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.6 > >>http://f.a.o/docs_0_70/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.7 > >>http://f.a.o/docs_0_80/ will refer to the d

[testing] RC1 testing results

2005-06-16 Thread Tim Williams
I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw were: -- Tab not highlighting I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that clicking on the "Versioned Docs" tab doesn't highlight that tab -- meaning you click on it and essentially lose context of where t

Re: [testing] RC1 testing results

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
Tim Williams wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw > > were: > > > > -- Tab not highlighting > > I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that > > clicking on the "Versioned Docs" tab doesn't highlight that tab

Re: [testing] RC1 testing results

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
Tim Williams wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw > > were: > > > > -- Tab not highlighting > > I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that > > clicking on the "Versioned Docs" tab doesn't highlight that tab

[jira] Updated: (FOR-209) First level selected tab is not highlighted when containing 2nd level tabs

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-209?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-209: --- Fix Version: 0.8 Description: When there are two levels of tabs, the selected first level tab does not get highlighted, nor are there any other visual or struct

[jira] Resolved: (FOR-545) PDFs for the generated DTD documentation is going haywire

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-545?page=all ] David Crossley resolved FOR-545: Resolution: Incomplete That reduced the site build time from 20 minutes to six minutes. > PDFs for the generated DTD documentation is going haywire > ---

Re: [testing] RC1 testing results

2005-06-16 Thread Tim Williams
On 6/16/05, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tested the RC1 and found no major issues. Some trivial things I saw were: > > -- Tab not highlighting > I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug but I found it odd that > clicking on the "Versioned Docs" tab doesn't highlight that tab -- >

[jira] Commented: (FOR-545) PDFs for the generated DTD documentation is going haywire

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-545?page=comments#action_12313880 ] David Crossley commented on FOR-545: The six documents are generated twice (for docs_0_70 and docs_0_60) so that is 12 extra minutes on the build time. I will move these docs

[jira] Created: (FOR-545) PDFs for the generated DTD documentation is going haywire

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
PDFs for the generated DTD documentation is going haywire - Key: FOR-545 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-545 Project: Forrest Type: Bug Components: Documentation and website Versions: 0.7-d

[Testing 0.7rc1] Calling site from ant may not download plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Ron Blaschke
Ross: simplifiedDocbook worked ok, the page rendered nicely. Thanks! There are two other things I'd like to mention 0.7/docs/your-project.html says but forrest.build.xml is in directory main, so I guess it should read Another problem seems to be fetching the plugin, when

Re: svn commit: r190796 - in /forrest/trunk: main/fresh-site/forrest.properties main/webapp/sitemap.xmap site-author/status.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:44 +0200, Juan Jose Pablos wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Author: cheche > >> Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005 > >> New Revision: 190796 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Add a config selector

views dependency (was: Re: svn commit: r190919)

2005-06-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 17:20 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ > >>>> type="internal" > >> author="Apache Forrest Project" > >>- > >>website="http://forre

[jira] Commented: (FOR-363) -elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed

2005-06-16 Thread Dick Hollenbeck (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=comments#action_12313841 ] Dick Hollenbeck commented on FOR-363: - I applied the Jun/05 5:03 PM patch to current 0.7 (snap shotted via svn update as of yesterday), and it does not seem to fix this issue

Re: svn commit: r190919 - /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/whiteboard-plugins.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ http://forrest.apache.org/docs/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view"; + website="http://forrest.apache.org/pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view"; url="

Re: svn commit: r190919 - /forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/whiteboard-plugins.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 14:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ > type="internal" > author="Apache Forrest Project" > - > website="http://forrest.apache.org/docs/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.view"; > + > website="http://forrest.apache.or

[jira] Updated: (FOR-363) -elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=all ] Juan Jose Pablos updated FOR-363: - Attachment: for-363.patch added proper patch. > -elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed > --

Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Ross Gardler wrote: Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name "simplified-docbook" collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that "docbook" is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin "simplified." That is corr

Re: FOR 363

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Ross Gardler wrote: There is a typo in the patch: match="section/document//figure[starts-with(@src, 'my-images')]"|img[starts-with(@src, 'my-images')]" . /|\ | fixed thanks! I've not tested the solution, but it looks sensible. if no one has other ob

rc2 and vote soon (Was: [Important] code-freeze commenced)

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > >Next important milestones are: > >* Create release candidate #2 if there have been changes > >on Friday 2005-06-17 at 22:00 UTC [2] > >[2] > >http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=18&month=06&year=2005&p1=48&p2=176&p3=240&p4=22

Re: FOR 363

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Dick Hollenbeck wrote: What are the issues that make fixing FOR 363 so difficult that it appears not be slated for fixing in the 0.7 release? Thanks, Dick Hollenbeck I personally think that this was not been review properly. yesterday I had moved all the issues wi

Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name "simplified-docbook" collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that "docbook" is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin "simplified." That is correct. In fact I added a

Re: [VOTE] Plugin Docs build system

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Please review the patch for the plugin docs deployment system at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-544 This patch will be applied to trunk just before we build the second release candidate, unless a -1 vote is received before that time (i.e.

[VOTE] build patch Re: testing 0.7rc1 - build failed

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Thread moved to dev list, please direct replies there. Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Roland Becker wrote: system: w2ksp4 java: jdk1.5.0_03 1. download 0.7rc1 2. unpack 3. set environment 4. cd mysite 5. forrest seed 6. forrest X [0]

Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name "simplified-docbook" collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that "docbook" is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin "simplified." That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying

Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Ross Gardler wrote: Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name "simplified-docbook" collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that "docbook" is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin "simplified." That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying

Re: versioned plugin docs (Was: svn commit: r190111)

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: David Crossley wrote: Summarising ... http://f.a.o/docs_0_60/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.6 http://f.a.o/docs_0_70/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.7 http://f.a.o/docs_0_80/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.8 There will no

Re: svn commit: r190796 - in /forrest/trunk: main/fresh-site/forrest.properties main/webapp/sitemap.xmap site-author/status.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cheche Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005 New Revision: 190796 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796&view=rev Log: Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is true We are in a code

Re: [Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Ross Gardler
Ron Blaschke wrote: My current guess is that the name "simplified-docbook" collides with the versioned plugins naming, so that "docbook" is interpreted as a version number, and there is no plugin "simplified." That is correct. In fact I added a warning to the docs saying plugin names cannot h

[jira] Updated: (FOR-363) -elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-363?page=all ] Juan Jose Pablos updated FOR-363: - Attachment: for-363.patch Patch to allow other to review in a standard way. > -elements within aggregated pdf-pages are not displayed >

Re: FOR 363

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Dick Hollenbeck wrote: What are the issues that make fixing FOR 363 so difficult that it appears not be slated for fixing in the 0.7 release? Thanks, Dick Hollenbeck I personally think that this was not been review properly. yesterday I had moved all the issues with no components so they g

[Testing 0.7rc1] Possible troubles with simplified-docbook plugin

2005-06-16 Thread Ron Blaschke
I haven't had time to dig into this in detail, but I hope someone familiar with plugins will help me fill in the missing pieces. I tried to build some site with the new 0.7rc1, which contains simplified docbook documents. The site built successfully, but the pages were empty (shouldn't this fail?

Re: svn commit: r190796 - in /forrest/trunk: main/fresh-site/forrest.properties main/webapp/sitemap.xmap site-author/status.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Ross Gardler wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cheche Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005 New Revision: 190796 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796&view=rev Log: Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is true We are in a code freeze. This looks like a

Re: Versioned Plugins

2005-06-16 Thread Ron Blaschke
Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:33:36 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Ron Blaschke wrote: >> Sunday, June 12, 2005, 11:38:26 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>Ron Blaschke wrote: I am wondering if I made a mistake, and the URL should refer to the directory only, like the others do, i.e. url="http:

Re: svn commit: r190796 - in /forrest/trunk: main/fresh-site/forrest.properties main/webapp/sitemap.xmap site-author/status.xml

2005-06-16 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: Author: cheche Date: Wed Jun 15 12:53:39 2005 New Revision: 190796 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=190796&view=rev Log: Add a config selector so the i18n transformer only works whrn i18n is true We are in a code freeze. This looks like a non-

Re: versioned plugin docs (Was: svn commit: r190111)

2005-06-16 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Summarising ... > > http://f.a.o/docs_0_60/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.6 > http://f.a.o/docs_0_70/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.7 > http://f.a.o/docs_0_80/ will refer to the documentation for Forrest V0.8 > > There will no longer be th