Awesome! Many thanks for the links; taking a look now
James
On 1/13/06, David Fahlander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According the design decision for the C++ client, I would recommend
using the boost libraries for smart pointers and threads. See
www.boost.org http://www.boost.org/ .
Boost
Matt,
FYI.. this daytrader change has been merged to the 1.0 branch. Where
are you moving daytrader from (trunk or 1.0 branch)?
John
Original Message
Subject: svn commit: r365799 - in /geronimo/trunk/configs:
daytrader-jetty/project.xml daytrader-tomcat/project.xml
Preparing 1.0 branch for development of 1.0.1
-
Key: GERONIMO-1466
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1466
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Assigned to:
OK,
I am back.
David Jencks wrote:
I agree with Jeff that this change is unsatisfactory but I'm not as
sure as he is that backing it out is necessary, perhaps we can move
forward to an acceptable solution instead.
I have to ask - on what grounds is it unsatisfactory ?
If backing out is
Jeff Genender wrote:
First off...lets get over this...DJ has a great thread open. I really
don't want to continue this discussion as its wasting all of our time.
Comments in line...and this is it for responding to this nonsense...time
to move on...ok?
Jeff,
you cannot, on the one hand,
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Is it possible to look at the Sun implementation's source code to
distinguish enforced vs. ignored rules?
That would make the code not clean room.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the inherent over head in total order protocols, I think we
should work to limit the messages passed over the protocol, to only
the absolute minimum to make our cluster work reliably.
Specifically, I think this is only the distributed lock. For state
replication
inline at end...
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 12:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see it - I'm not sure why.
According to the website (http://www.bway.net/~lichtner/evs4j.html):
Extended Virtual Synchrony for Java (EVS4J), an Apache-
Licensed, pure-Java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you guys let me know if I can help you in any way.
Keep on talking ;-)
Okay. I will ask you a question then. What are you doing as far caching
entity beans?
In terms or replication or some form of distributed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-1422:
--
Description:
Can anyone reproduce this problem on other platforms?
If I start the tomcat build of the release candidate and then shut it down once
the
further thoughts at bottom
Jules Gosnell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you guys let me know if I can help you in any way.
Keep on talking ;-)
Okay. I will ask you a question then. What are you doing as far caching
entity beans?
In
Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with
server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its
initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that any
major releases of the server, will have a matching corresponding
eclipse feature
Thanks John. I forgot about this. I'll add this to my ToDo list.
- sachin
On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:42 AM, John Sisson wrote:
We might want to have a few versions of the pre-configured eclipse
launch configs (e.g. currently in http://people.apache.org/
~sppatel/eclipselaunchconfigs.zip
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1371?page=comments#action_12362635
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-1371:
---
The SQL Exception seems to be caused by the Derby System being shutdown.
System Thread [RMI TCP
I will take a closer look at it. My first impression was that
activecluster assumes a jms or jms-like api as a transport.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the inherent over head in total order protocols, I think we
should work to limit the messages passed over the protocol, to only
the absolute
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1349?page=comments#action_12362639
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1349:
Are we saying that the JMX connector is listening on an arbitrary port? That
would be really bad, as it sounds like it
I had the problem on my Mac.
Aaron
On 1/13/06, John Sisson (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-1422:
--
Description:
Can anyone reproduce this problem on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=comments#action_12362640
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1422:
I saw this issue on my Mac
Geronimo shutdown does not complete due to ActiveMQ attempting to reconnect
endpoints to
Huh??? Aaron has a Mac??? ;-)
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I had the problem on my Mac.
Aaron
On 1/13/06, John Sisson (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-1422:
--
/me blows coffee all over his keyboard
Jeff Genender wrote, On 1/13/2006 5:52 AM:
Huh??? Aaron has a Mac??? ;-)
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I had the problem on my Mac.
Aaron
On 1/13/06, John Sisson (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[
DB pool portlet error when web session saved
Key: GERONIMO-1467
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1467
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Aaron Mulder
Duh -- I've had a G5 for ages. I still use a ThinkPad as a laptop,
but I've pretty much switched from Linux to Mac on the desktop.
Unfortunately, both the initial ThinkPad T60 and the initial MacBook
Pro have their little drawbacks... I'm hoping February will bring
some developments... :)
On 1/13/06, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Totem might be useful here ?ActiveSpace (in incubator) may already have support for this sort of thing ?If you had a working clustered cache with a cache loader pointing at theentity...
Yes, ActiveSpace currently has a distributed JCache
As a frequent user of enterprise application development tooling I can
attest to the fact that discrepancies between the version numbers in
the tool/plugin and the application server it is compatible with or
embeds can lead to confusion and lost productivity. So I would
definitely vote in favor of
On 1/13/06, Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Okay. I will ask you a question then. What are you doing as far caching
entity beans?In terms or replication or some form of distributed invalidation, I'mnot aware that this has been discussed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1467?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1467:
---
Description:
09:51:16,405 ERROR [ManagerBase] IOException while loading persisted
sessions: j
ava.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted;
Jeff,
Can you please calm down? I'm trying to discuss your concerns, but
you appear to be taking offence that I'm doing so?
These are not my changes - I'm just an interested observer on this one
trying to interpret the arguments that have been put forward!
Greg, based on the fact that I
I'm wondering what claims *Geronimo v1* can make concerning JMS
clustering. I do see that ActiveMQ makes quite a few claims around
clustering though am wondering exactly which capabilities are
leveraged/relevant to Geronimo v1?
Clustering/failover of message brokers?
If so, where is this
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=comments#action_12362648
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-1422:
I've also seen these messages on my Mac (but server still stopped).
This reconnect problem looks pretty basic. It seems
Jeff,
I really can't understand your -1, let alone the backing out of
the changes, nor all of the hullabaloo.
It is quite straightforward: in 1.0 WADI did not work in Tomcat
nor Jetty. Unfortunate and disappointing, but true. Period.
We have made minimal changes to make it work in the 1.0.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1442?page=all ]
Hernan Cunico resolved GERONIMO-1442:
-
Fix Version: 1.0
(was: 1.0.1)
Resolution: Fixed
JBoss to Geronimo - JDBC Migration documentation has been updated.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1467?page=comments#action_12362655
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-1467:
Aaron, I see the same NullPointerException (but not the serialization
exception) if I place a jar into my geronimo
FileSystemRepository#listUris() produces wrong URI array when the repository
contains a malformed entry
---
Key: GERONIMO-1468
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1468?page=all ]
Kristian Koehler updated GERONIMO-1468:
---
Attachment: FileSystemRepository.patch
FileSystemRepository#listUris() produces wrong URI array when the repository
contains a malformed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1468?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1468:
---
Component: console
core
Fix Version: 1.0.1
1.1
Version: 1.0
FileSystemRepository#listUris() produces
Aaron,
this may not be the same issue, but I came across something that might
help whilst working on the WADI integrations...
I figured that AMQ's shutdown hook was seeing the ctl-c and shutting
down AMQ before Geronimo had actually had a chance to do so.
AMQ's shutdown hook can be
I see one short criticalcommingon Geronimo at the moment is we haven't defined what can and what we have todo in terms of clustering.
I am glad you started the thread on JMS clustering, so some of the questions will be addressed
There is no documentation out there what has been done or needs to
My understanding is that ActiveMQ has full-featured clustering
functionality.
I am sure that James will elaborate.
Jules
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
I see one short critical comming on Geronimo at the moment is we
haven't defined what can and what we have to do in terms of clustering.
I am
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1422:
---
Attachment: shutdown_rhel3.txt
After following the recreate steps and pressing Ctrl-C I got a big honkin stack
trace but the server shut down.
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0
Alignment of major releases will avoid confusion and the need for a
compatibility matrix. Also, hopefully will eliminate an onslaught of
questions as to which levels are compatible..
-Dave-
Sachin Patel wrote:
Its been brought to my attention
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Aaron,
this may not be the same issue, but I came across something that
might help whilst working on the WADI integrations...
I figured that AMQ's shutdown hook was seeing the ctl-c and
shutting down AMQ before Geronimo had actually had
Hi all,I am working on integration Jetspeed 2 with Geronimo(Tomcat container). I have the following configuration in my j2 main
web.xml.- security-constraint
- web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameLogin
/web-resource-name
url-pattern/login/redirector
/url-pattern
2006/1/13, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0
[ ] Leave it at 0.5.0
[ ] Doesn't matter
Jacek
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1194?page=comments#action_12362670
]
erik daughtrey commented on GERONIMO-1194:
--
Installer Dev Notes
* Built with IzPack ( http://izforge/izpack ), currently based on 3.8.0
* Added images based on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1455?page=comments#action_12362676
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1455:
It sounds like the console is calling the wrong method. To start the gbeans in
a config, you need to call
We should be able to put this in the SystemProperties gbean rather
than on the command line
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 13, 2006, at 7:41 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Aaron,
this may not be the same issue, but I came across something that
might help whilst working on the WADI integrations...
The repository uses a different format than a straight path. First,
you should put a version number in the file name:
samples/jars/samples-1.0.jar
Then the repository URI should look like group/artifact/version/type,
which in this case would be:
samples/samples/1.0/jar
Thanks,
Aaron
On
If you cluster an entity bean on two nodes naively, you lose many of the
benefits of caching. This is because neither node, at the beginning of a
transaction, knows whether the other node has changed the beans contents
since it was last loaded into cache, so the cache must be assumed
+1 to what ever Sachin wants to call it.
-dain
On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with
server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its
initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here
With regard to clustering, I also want to mention a remote option, which
is to use infiniband RDMA for inter-node communication.
With an infiniband link between two machines you can copy a buffer
directly from the memory of one to the memory of the other, without
switching context. This means
On Jan 12, 2006, at 3:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. You license the code to the Apache Software Foundation giving
the foundation the rights to relicense under any license (so the
foundation can upgrade the license as they did with ASL2). We do ask
that you change the copyrights on the
ClassNotFound when running
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: Bug
Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: Kathy Chan
Driver:
- WTP 1.0
- Geronimo 1.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46?page=all ]
Kathy Chan updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46:
---
Summary: ClassNotFound when publishing to Geronimo when Eclipse is launched
with JDK1.5 (was: ClassNotFound when running)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 1/13/2006 11:51 AM:
With regard to clustering, I also want to mention a remote option, which
is to use infiniband RDMA for inter-node communication.
With an infiniband link between two machines you can copy a buffer
directly from the memory of one to the memory of
Interesting. Can you suggest a protocol we should use for
pessimistic distributed locking? I expect the cluster size to be
between 2-16 nodes with the sweet spot at 4 nodes. Each node will
be processing about 500-1000 tps and each tps will require on average
about 1-4 lock requests (most
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The infiniband transport would be native code, so you could use JNI.
However, it would definitely be worth it.
Do you have any references to the where one could get a peek at the
transport API?
http://infiniband.sourceforge.net/
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46?page=comments#action_12362687
]
Daniel S. Haischt commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-46:
---
This is a duplicate of GERONIMODEVTOOLS-44 aka GERONIMO-1454.
ClassNotFound when publishing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1469?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMO-1469:
---
Component: deployment
ClassNotFound when publishing to Geronimo when Eclipse is launched with JDK1.5
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1469?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMO-1469:
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of 1454
ClassNotFound when publishing to Geronimo when Eclipse is launched with JDK1.5
As Jules requested I am looking at the AC api. I report my observations
below:
ClusterEvent appears to represent membership-related events. These you
can generate from evs4j, as follows: write an adapter that implements
evs4j.Listener. In the onConfiguration(..) method you get notified of
new
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1455?page=comments#action_12362696
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-1455:
I think the console is doing the right thing here based upon your comment
David.
Here is the code from the ConfigManagerPortlet
Our context root settings should take precedence over those from application.xml
Key: GERONIMO-1470
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1470
Project: Geronimo
Type:
I still can't build HEAD. I am using maven 1.0.2 on Ubuntu Linux with
jdk 1.4.2 and svn revision 368935.
I've done:
+ deleted geronimo from my local repo
+ deleted the plugins from my local repo
+ deleted configs/*/target
+ maven m:fresh-checkout
+ maven m:clean
+ maven new
The build complains
On 13 Jan 2006, at 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With regard to clustering, I also want to mention a remote option,
which
is to use infiniband RDMA for inter-node communication.
With an infiniband link between two machines you can copy a buffer
directly from the memory of one to the memory
On 13 Jan 2006, at 06:39, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
I'm wondering what claims *Geronimo v1* can make concerning JMS
clustering. I do see that ActiveMQ makes quite a few claims around
clustering though am wondering exactly which capabilities are
leveraged/relevant to Geronimo v1?
Hi Jan,
Is it possible to checkout the trunk from scratch and try that? If it fails
we'll know its not something residual in your build environment.
Jan Bartel wrote:
I still can't build HEAD. I am using maven 1.0.2 on Ubuntu Linux with
jdk 1.4.2 and svn revision 368935.
I've done:
+
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1427?page=comments#action_12362706
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1427:
Previous work had some missing dependencies so maven could decide to build some
j2ee configs before the openejb and axis
+1
I agree with keeping the versions in sync will reduce confusion.
Sachin Patel wrote:
Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with
server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its
initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0
[ ] Leave it at 0.5.0
[ ] Doesn't matter
Regards,
Alan
There were definitely some missing dependencies that explain the
possibility of the first problem you encountered. I'm still confused
by the second one. I've fixed the dependency problems I know about.
Can you update and try again? You should be able to just do:
rm -rf
+1 to 1.0.0
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with
server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its
initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0. The idea here being that
any
I was irc-ing today with someone who suggested it would be useful to
make it possible for our plans to override the context-root in an
ear's application.xml with a different value in our plan somewhere.
One obvious choice is the context-root in a web plan. After thinking
about this a
This is an interesting subject. The question is, do we do things
consistently? My concern at the moment is to have the application.xml
be the deciding factor for one reason. People can go into the
config.store and look at it and determine, that the context-root is set
to a value and assume that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1466?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1466:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hogstrom:~/dev/geronimo/branches/1.0 hogstrom$ svn commit -m Geronimo-1466
1.0.1 Branch Update
Adding
All,
I have updated the 1.0 branch with 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT as well as removed dayTrader
from the main build. At this point it builds on my system :)
Please take a minute to update and see if I missed anything.
I'll go over the JIRA's (about 30 of them) this weekend.
Remember the goal is
Has anyone had any luck getting Geronimo to work with WebSphere MQ
5.3 w/XA?
--jason
76 matches
Mail list logo
