On 5/3/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
its a neat solution, I like it.one would still need to build the "aggregate" view, so that summariesetc can be reported on,Agreed. FWIW Lingo does this too right now - though I'm sure we might want to get more clever in how the aggregati
I suggest you start by reading the SingleFileHotDeploy service I
wrote last week. It uses the most recent apis.
-dain
On May 3, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
I have seen the same problems with Geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT also. So i
will create JIRA ID for these two issues and start wor
CLI undeploy interactive mode
-
Key: GERONIMO-1983
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1983
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.0
Repo
Nice. :)
Aaron
On 5/4/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I was kind of inspired by Dain looking over the crufty
> KernelManagementHelper (though unfortunately, I haven't yet finished
> returning the favor).
>
> In any case, I cou
The CORBA action is in the Yoko project:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/yoko.html
Geronimo's plan, such as it is, is to adopt Yoko when it's ready and
thereby escape the ORB built into JDK 1.4.2. So if you can help move
the Yoko effort along, that would be great. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On
On May 3, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I was kind of inspired by Dain looking over the crufty
KernelManagementHelper (though unfortunately, I haven't yet finished
returning the favor).
In any case, I could produce a list of a few classes that are big and
ugly and need refactoring. Fo
This sounds pretty nice. I'm not sure I have the will to set up a
Geronimo environment on Windows to try it, but it would be really cool
if we avoided all the file locking problems caused by the jar handling
there. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I add
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1802?page=comments#action_12377725
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1802:
Applied webserver-listeners.patch and dbinfo.patch (thanks Paul!), leaving only
removeDependencies.patch for later.
> Con
Thanks Aaron for your quick response
I would like to participate on fixing the CORBA issue.
I referred the information given in http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/CORBA.
But I am afraid that content is pretty old (dated 2005-07-02).
Could you please guide me to right direction ?
With warm regard
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1506?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1506:
Resolution: Fixed
> DB info portlet should use new GeronimoVersion
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1508?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1508:
Resolution: Fixed
Work is substantially complete
> 1.1 won't accept plans with 1.0 configIds in references, parents, imports,
> etc.
> ---
On 5/4/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought 1.1 was done and in testing in prep for release?
No, there are still plenty of serious bugs (including, it would seem,
with the hot deployer). We're close enough that we cut a build so
people don't have to build from SVN, but I
I was kind of inspired by Dain looking over the crufty
KernelManagementHelper (though unfortunately, I haven't yet finished
returning the favor).
In any case, I could produce a list of a few classes that are big and
ugly and need refactoring. For instance, there are a couple rewritten
yet still
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Please do any work in the 1.1 branch. Right now 1.2 is in a very
uncertain state. Though, I suspect the issues will be different in
1.1, so you may want to start by testing the same things there.
IIRC, the hot deployer does not yet check the timestamp of the
deployments i
Why are the plugins using geronimoVersion in addition to the
standdard geronimo_version?
I remember seeing some of that usage in the past, though it seems to
have flourished.
-David
On May 3, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
Cool.
Can you
server try to deploy the modules in hot deployment directory again during
server startup
Key: GERONIMO-1982
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1982
Project: Geronimo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1273?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1273:
--
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> JMS Network Listener add dialogs should give some context information on the
> protocol.
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1273?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1273:
--
Attachment: 1273-jms-listener-add-dialog.patch
This patch changes the add dialog to show the protocol.
> JMS Network Listener add dialogs should give so
Web Connector has GBean=(container name) in AbstractName
Key: GERONIMO-1981
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1981
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Component
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1231?page=all ]
Erin Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1231:
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Was unable to reproduce with:
Operating System: SuSE Linux 10
JVM: Sun 1.5.0_06
G Version: 1.1-SNAPSHOT w/Jetty
I have seen the same problems with Geronimo-1.1-SNAPSHOT also. So i will create JIRA ID for these two issues and start working.
Rakesh RanjanOn 5/4/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please do any work in the 1.1 branch. Right now 1.2 is in a veryuncertain state. Though, I suspect the i
Geronimo 1.1 runs under JDK 1.5, but will not be J2EE certified on JDK
1.5. The CORBA features do not work in 1.5, but everything else
should. There is an issue if you serialize a QName under JDK 1.4 and
deserialize it until JDK 1.5, but that is not a Geronimo problem per
se -- and it shouldn't
Hi All,
I would like to work on the enhancement based on JDK 1.5.
Can any one please let me know about the current status of the same?
With Warm Regards,
Reghu
Please do any work in the 1.1 branch. Right now 1.2 is in a very
uncertain state. Though, I suspect the issues will be different in
1.1, so you may want to start by testing the same things there.
IIRC, the hot deployer does not yet check the timestamp of the
deployments in it its directory duri
Thanks Aaron for the quick response.
Here are two issues with Geronimo-1.2-SNAPSHOT which need to be fixed :
1. When Geronimo starts, it try to deploy the modules in the hot
deployment directory even if that module is already deployed. Since
the application is already deployed, it throws an error
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1769?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1769:
Resolution: Fixed
> Console should create links for all sections including the "current section"
> -
You're welcome to look at that. Can you list the issues you're going
to attempt to fix? There seems to be a lot of variation in what
people think the problems actually are.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/4/06, Rakesh Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have not seen much activity in hot depl
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=comments#action_36140 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-704:
---
The reason the singleton map was put in the System properties were chosen in
the first place is because it's guaranteed to be in the pri
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reassigned AMQ-704:
-
Assign To: Hiram Chirino
> ActiveIO compromises java.lang.System.properties
>
>
> Key: AMQ-704
>
Hi all,
I have not seen much activity in hot deployment directory enhancement.
I have seen there are some bugs in the current implementation of hot
deployment directory. I am interested to work on this enhancement. So i
want to know the current status of this enhancement? Is some other
member work
Do you have one of these for OpenEJB too? Is there anything to do
thre other than etc/project.properties?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/4/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
> Cool.
>
> Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1683?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1683:
Resolution: Fixed
patch applied, thanks!
> Web app context-root should trim whitespace
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1887?page=all ]
Erin Mulder updated GERONIMO-1887:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
> Remove unneeded jars from console WEB-INF/lib directories
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1900?page=comments#action_12377703
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1900:
I agree with Dave's analysis.
Also, I don't like the fact that the patch has a hardcoded port in the redirect
URL, or tha
Thar she blows
David Blevins wrote:
Cool.
Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build and
start with different verion number. Trying to update the
publish_build.sh script. Got the standard plugins and
etc/project.properties stuff, but it seems i'm missing something
Move Plugin Installer from rmi-naming to j2ee-system
Key: GERONIMO-1980
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1980
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Component
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979?page=comments#action_12377698
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-1979:
--
Dain's comment in G-1925
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925#action_12377686 )
"I just committed a ne
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925?page=comments#action_12377695
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-1925:
--
Dain has fixed this problem in G-1979
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979). This issue may be closed.
Can we use this URL for JIRA:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO
instead of the version that is up there now:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10220
--jason
On 5/2/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
when we updated the web site we
Add custom class loader that does not leave open file locks
---
Key: GERONIMO-1979
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1979
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues
I added a new optional class loader to 1.1 which should fix our file
lock problem on Windows. To enable the class loader use the
following command line option:
-DXorg.apache.geronimo.NewClassLoader=true
If the class loader actually solves the problem, and passes the TCK
we can mak
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1925?page=comments#action_12377686
]
Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-1925:
--
I just committed a new class loader that should eliminate the file locks
created by the class loader. To enable the n
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the ping. I would be happy to engage and walk through some
ideas, etc. But you hit the nail on the head...I am working hard on
trying to get us to J1 - so many hours in the day! ;-)
I am with you all the way on offering a more robust solution and am in
complete alignment o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1978:
--
Assign To: Matt Hogstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
> little-G for Jetty
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1978
> URL: http://issues.apache.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1978:
---
Attachment: 1978_littleG-jettty.patch
I created this patch on windows under the geronimo root directory.
Please note: I've had problems in the past where ne
little-G for Jetty
--
Key: GERONIMO-1978
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1978
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: general
Versions: 1.1
Environment: all
Reporter: J
+1
David Blevins wrote:
On May 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/site/
I think these proposed changes will facilitate access to the
documentation, increase it's visibility and hopefully we will see more
volunteers to continue developing the docs.
On May 3, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview (http://
opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/
Clustering), but little content, due to th
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will go ahead an implement this changes (including the proposal for the
documentation), will need
the XBean and GBuild info from you before though :)
It's great to see more participation in the documentation. However,
please revise the pro
Hi,
Jeff, I do know that you are working hard on preparing the release of
G1.1; however, when you get more time, could you please try to expand a
little bit on this subject?
I am curious to see how the Session API has been implemented and how it
is leveraged to provide clustering capabilitie
On May 3, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Great, if you can provide with some content for XBean and GBuild I
will create the respective directories and reorg accordingly.
devtools.html is currently at root level so I will move it to the
existing devtools directory and rename it as i
Hi Guys,
I couldn't compile the current solution file (in VS.NET 2005), it was missing some includes.
Here is the patch to get the project compiling.
Cheers,
Rob.
Index: activemq-dotnet.csproj
===
--- activemq-dotnet.csproj (
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1848?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1848:
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Shared Library support via a GBean
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1848
> URL: http://issues.ap
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1961?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1961:
--
Assign To: Joe Bohn
> SingleFileHotDeployer - Application is not started on server restart
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1962?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1962:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assign To: Joe Bohn
This issue and resolution was integrated in to GERONIMO-1946
> SingleFileHotDeployer: Messages on the deplo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1961?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1961:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This issue and fix was integrated into GERONIMO-1946
> SingleFileHotDeployer - Application is not started on server restart
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1946:
--
Assign To: Dain Sundstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
> SingleFileHotDeploy fixes for resolve, no force restart, empty target, and
> messages
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1946:
---
Attachment: 1946_SFHDResolvePlus.patch
This patch includes changes for all of the items mentioned in the description.
Use this patch (1946_SFHDResolvePlus.pa
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1946:
---
Summary: SingleFileHotDeploy fixes for resolve, no force restart, empty
target, and messages (was: SingleFileHotDeploy does not correctly resolve the
con
Great, if you can provide with some content for XBean and GBuild I will create the respective
directories and reorg accordingly.
devtools.html is currently at root level so I will move it to the existing devtools directory and
rename it as index.html.
I will go ahead an implement this changes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1946?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1946:
--
Assign To: Joe Bohn (was: Dain Sundstrom)
> SingleFileHotDeploy does not correctly resolve the configuration ID.
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1977:
--
Assign To: David Jencks (was: Joe Bohn)
> Remove corba spec & javamail spec from rmi-naming
> -
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1977:
---
Attachment: 1977_RemoveDeps.patch
patch was created on windows xp from geronimo root directory.
> Remove corba spec & javamail spec from rmi-naming
>
Remove corba spec & javamail spec from rmi-naming
-
Key: GERONIMO-1977
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1977
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: dependencie
On May 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/site/
I think these proposed changes will facilitate access to the
documentation, increase it's visibility and hopefully we will see
more volunteers to continue developing the docs.
Thoughts, comments, s
Cool.
Can you post a diff of what you had to change to get G to build and
start with different verion number. Trying to update the
publish_build.sh script. Got the standard plugins and etc/
project.properties stuff, but it seems i'm missing something still.
-David
On May 3, 2006, at 8:2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976?page=comments#action_12377630
]
Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-1976:
--
BTW, the patch should get applied to /applications/welcome/src/webapp/
Thanks
> Change Welcome Application for G1.1
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-1976:
-
Attachment: welcome-app.patch
> Change Welcome Application for G1.1
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1976
>
Change Welcome Application for G1.1
---
Key: GERONIMO-1976
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1976
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: usability
Versions: 1.1
Hi All,
I remember discussing about the alternative commands for starting and stopping the server but I
can't find that note.
Did we ever came up with an official position as of what would be the preferred commands to start
and stop the server? I also believe we even mentioned about adding a l
0.1.11 to 1.0.0 appears like a major jump... What else has changed?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: "Udovichenko, Nellya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:14:53
To:
Subject: New HOWL version in Geronimo
Hello!
Now version of HOWL in Geronimo is 0.1.11. What do you
Yay! Thanks Geir!!
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
>> interest on getting one together?
>>
>
> Yes - I asked for a slot late and I think we have it. More as I know it.
>
> geir
>
>> I haven't seen or
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the documentation was uploaded into a JIRA and granted ASF
license long time ago. I say most
because the last updates have not been yet uploaded. Once we have
cwiki.apache.org in production the
license should no
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
interest on getting one together?
Yes - I asked for a slot late and I think we have it. More as I know it.
geir
I haven't seen or heard of any from our community here. I think it
would be great to g
No, I wasn't suggesting that updating the Wiki hoses up the copyright. You have a much better
understanding of copyrights and ownership than I do; you've written a book and I can barely read.
What I was referring to was my perceived distinction between project documentation and supporting
docum
its a neat solution, I like it.
one would still need to build the "aggregate" view, so that summaries
etc can be reported on,
otherwise you only view a server at a time, which can be achieved by
just connecting to the server itself.
by aggregate I mean the sum of the nodes in the cluster, for
security builder should trim everything
---
Key: GERONIMO-1975
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1975
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.1
Yes...I have some connections I can try to ping...
Great idea for a topic though!
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I think that would be great. I've love to spend some time there doing
> an introduction to plugins. But don't we need Sun to bless any BOF
> for JavaOne?
>
> Thanks,
>Aaron
>
> On 5/3/0
I think that would be great. I've love to spend some time there doing
an introduction to plugins. But don't we need Sun to bless any BOF
for JavaOne?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/3/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
intere
That would be great. I don't know of one. It would be good to get the committers (and other
community members) together and hammer out some of the details on the community goals. Aaron's
document is a great starting point.
Matt
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaO
Anyone know of any Geronimo BOFs at JavaOne this year? If not, any
interest on getting one together?
I haven't seen or heard of any from our community here. I think it
would be great to get everyone together and do some form of BOF to
update everyone of where we are at and where we are going.
T
BTW I'm not necessarily saying that the Lingo JMX connector is *the* solution, just *a* solution - but I think the general approach of using distributed JMX connectors seems like a good, standards based approach to monitoring and controlling clusters of POJOs. Then folks can choose the JMX connecto
James Strachan wrote:
Distributed JMX sounds like a simple way to monitor a cluster of any
Java stuff. Details on using clustered JMX over JMS here...
http://lingo.codehaus.org/JMX+over+JMS
which lets you monitor the cluster in a single MBeanServer
cool - sounds like exactly the sort of thin
Hi Chris,
we are currently ironing out all remaining issues so we can feel
comfortable calling for a vote for a GA release of ActiveMQ very
soon. We want to actively start discussing the changes required on
the dev list - but want to get 4.0 settled first. So if you could
bear with us for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1974?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1974:
-
Attachment: redeploy-stacktrace.txt
> Listing WARs portlet broken after a redeploy using CLI
>
I have been testing the redeploy functionality using CLI and came
across the following issues/questions/concerns. Basically, I have been
redeploying the same war but bumping the version # in the plan.
1) After a redeploy is done by CLI, the portelt in the console that
displays the list is broken.
Listing WARs portlet broken after a redeploy using CLI
--
Key: GERONIMO-1974
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1974
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: c
Hi folks,
I think that the 4.0 release has been cooking long enough and we
should do a 4.0 final release before Java 1. Since that last RC3
build, numerous small bugs and memory leaks have been tightened up.
Also LICENSE files for the 3rd party dependencies have been added to
the distribution.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=comments#action_36138 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-629:
It certainly is on the m2 build on OS X
> test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-652?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-652:
--
Fix Version: 4.1
(was: 4.0)
ActiveMQ 4 has been integrated in the Geronimo 1.2 branch but that branch is
still not under heavy delveopment a
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-629?page=comments#action_36136 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-629:
---
Adiran,
Is this still broken?
> test case SslTransportBrokerTest not working
>
>
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-501?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-501:
---
Resolution: Fixed
I created the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/systest/weblogic-test
modules to test MDB and outbund jms conne
Distributed JMX sounds like a simple way to monitor a cluster of any
Java stuff. Details on using clustered JMX over JMS here...
http://lingo.codehaus.org/JMX+over+JMS
which lets you monitor the cluster in a single MBeanServer
On 5/3/06, Jules Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to ki
I'd like to kick off a thread about the monitoring of clustered
deployments...
There is a section in the 1,000ft Clustering Overview
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Clustering),
but little content, due to the fact that there has been little
discussion about th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1789?page=comments#action_12377593
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1789:
I dont think we want to apply individual change to trunk at this point. Let's
wrap up 1.1 and then decide how we want to
No good deed goes unpunished...the URLs below were malformed. Please use these
instead. Apologies.
Tomcat Versions
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/20060502/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-20060502.zip
Jetty
All
The Geronimo Team is happy to provide you with a stable build of Geronimo 1.1 for your review,
testing and comments. This is not the final release of Geronimo 1.1 but is an excellent
representation of what will be available in 1.1. I will follow this note up with a set of
Preliminary Rel
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1973?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1973:
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 399294
geronimo-spec-javamail/src/main/java/javax/mail/Session.java
> javamail Session class using wrong
On 5/3/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the documentation was uploaded into a JIRA and granted ASF license long
time ago. I say most
because the last updates have not been yet uploaded. Once we have
cwiki.apache.org in production the
license should no longer be an issue.
A
javamail Session class using wrong classloader search sequence for resolving
providers.
---
Key: GERONIMO-1973
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1973
Project: Geronimo
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
