Just finished a deploy of the latest snaps with the openejb changes.
--jason
We could publish the catalog to the m2 repo too, just need to had
some custom build fluff to attach the xml file as a build artifact.
--jason
On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Like Aaron said, plugin repositories already use a maven repository
layout with the exception of one
Both passed fine for me. Perhaps you did not have an up to date
build or a sync'd testsuite with the latest changes?
--jason
On Sep 28, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The first test timed out in 30 mins. The 2nd test seems to be just
blocked.
[INFO]
Like Aaron said, plugin repositories already use a maven repository
layout with the exception of one file -- geronimo-plugins.xml. That
file is basically a catalog for all the plugins hosted in a
repository. I discovered something very interesting tonight, which
is that the catalog does not act
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-945?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-945.
---
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Gabriel! Applied the fix on the 4.0 branch
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/branches/activemq-4
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-945?page=all ]
Jonas Lim reassigned AMQ-945:
-
Assignee: Jonas Lim
> jaas and jdbm twice on project.xml
> --
>
> Key: AMQ-945
> URL: https://issues
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-936?page=all ]
Fritz Oconer reassigned AMQ-936:
Assignee: Fritz Oconer
> Expired Messages being delivered
>
>
> Key: AMQ-936
> URL: https://i
The first test timed out in 30 mins. The 2nd test seems to be just blocked.
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.deployment.Ear13Test
[INFO] Test
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-608?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder updated SM-608:
Attachment: pom.xml.diff.txt
Attaching a patch to fix the issue.
> The wsdl-first example is broken because it cannot locate the
> 3.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT version o
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-608?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder closed SM-608.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Bruce Snyder
Sendingpom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 451073.
> The wsdl-first example is broken because it
The wsdl-first example is broken because it cannot locate the
3.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT version of the jbi-maven-plugin
--
Key: SM-608
URL: https://
It would be more to cure curiosity :-)
I think that upgrading xerces and xml-apis might be more important.
G uses still xerces 2.6.2 which has a file date of feb 2004 in the
historical part of the download area.
2.8.1 is the most recent. should I open a jira?
On 9/28/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAI
I think these problems mean that you haven't updated or built the g
root pom that has the openejb jars in the dependency management
section. I updated the openejb versions there. I updated the
openejb and g. openejb version a bit after this email, so maybe your
g. is not up to date.
tha
On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:50 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
adc
r367046 3 lines PR: GERONIMO-1432 Removed wrapPrincipals attribute.
Merged.
Thanks. I updated the all_changes.txt file, so you shouldn't get any
more messages from me :)
-dain
Sounds like its going to timeout hitting the war pages...
--jason
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The selenium tests on windows blocks. Firefox does not open.
I now have 5 java processes running.
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S
The selenium tests on windows blocks. Firefox does not open.
I now have 5 java processes running.
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
[INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.deploymen
On Sep 28, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx for the response Jason.
Please see if the attached components.xml is good for our new
"integration-test" custom packaging.
http://rifers.org/paste/show/1855
Hi Prasad, I have already committed the new packaging and hooked up
the deploy
Sorry, but I don't remember. Matt presented the problem to me, I
suggested removing the jars from the endorsed dir, and the problem
went away. If you are really interested, I'll volunteer Matt to find
out the exact class :)
-dain
On Sep 28, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Heinz Drews wrote:
Dain,
wh
Thanx for the response Jason.
Please see if the attached components.xml is good for our new
"integration-test" custom packaging.
http://rifers.org/paste/show/1855
If we used the m-m-p to invoke child poms, won't they inherit the
goals from their parents ? If they do, then won't start-server and
[This is a followup to the "Getting releases out" email I sent last
week in which I said I would start a thread on prioritizing the
features for 1.2. Unfortunately, I had to travel earlier this week,
and only am getting to this now. Sorry]
For the 1.2 release, we have decided to define th
In fact, I had to use that version to all configs that depended on openejb-*.
2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency -
2.2-incubati
As soon as svn comes back (eris is down at the moment), I am going to
commit a change to the specs tree that will only enable the jdk 1.5
specific modules when the jvm is jdk 1.5 compatible.
Since G does not yet depend on those added jdk 1.5 modules, this
means that bootstrap (asis) should
Dain,
which class or interface has triggered the problem?
Only
org.w3c.dom
org.xml.sax
org.xml.sax.ext
org.xml.sax.helpers
are part of the endorsed library mechanism.
Subpackages of org.w3c.dom are optional.
Other classes are part of regular class loading.
On 9/28/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PRO
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency -
2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT
Do I have something screwed up ?
Cheers
Prasad.
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can publish the G bits once I get it to build.
--jason
It is easier to comprehend the 3 repeated versions next to each
other, than it is to manage a set of properties which are defined
elsewhere.
If properties could be defined inline with dependency's in a
dependencyManagement section, then it would be fine. But with out
that, we end up with
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Heinz Drews wrote:
There was sometime ago a discussion thread about the requirement to
have the jars in endorsed dirs also on the classpath.
If endorsed would have bee
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2441?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2441.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done in rev 450987.
> Change configs, assemblies to adapt to new org.apache.openejb package name
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2444?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2444.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Add new "integration-test" packaging for testsuite modules
> --
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2444?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2444:
---
Summary: Add new "integration-test" packaging for testsuite modules (was:
Create a new packaging for the geronimo-maven-plugin)
> Add new "integratio
Hi,
This commit log shows that we need versions to be kept as properties
in section of Geronimo pom. On the other hand, I'm pretty
sure that Jason, Anita, Prasad or others who've been working on the M2
build have already spot it and there must be some obvious reasons it
is not done this way. Wha
I can publish the G bits once I get it to build.
--jason
On Sep 28, 2006, at 12:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've changed the trunk/openejb2 code to the org.apache.openejb
package, and the groupIds to org.apache.openejb as well.
Everyone's gonna have to update their openejb copy and rebuild
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2445?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2445.
--
Resolution: Fixed
g. rev 451020
openejb rev 451019
> openejb needs incubator in its version
> --
>
>
openejb needs incubator in its version
--
Key: GERONIMO-2445
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2445
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affe
Sorry for the delay, here are the results (for both rounds)...ROUND 1+1: jason, jacek, gnodet, jeff, dblevins, prasad, bsynder, djencks, gianny+0: joe, paulROUND 2+1: bill, alan, kevan, david, gianny+0: rick, joe * * *I will copy the artifacts from my local user repo to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository
I've changed the trunk/openejb2 code to the org.apache.openejb
package, and the groupIds to org.apache.openejb as well. Everyone's
gonna have to update their openejb copy and rebuild.
Can anyone push a new set of snapshots?
The new version of openejb builds for me, all tests pass, and I've
On Sep 28, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Heinz Drews wrote:
There was sometime ago a discussion thread about the requirement to
have the jars in endorsed dirs also on the classpath.
If endorsed would have been picked up then this w
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:07 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I decided to try an experiment using the jetty-j2ee Geronimo
> >> assembly.
> >> I deleted the Xerces jars from the lib
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
There is a lot of text here and I'm a bit confused. FWIU, to use the
trick we used in bootstrap you need the following:
1) add your endorsed jars to the manifest class path
2) no code accessed during the boot process can reference an endorsed
package
3) modify the endor
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Heinz Drews wrote:
There was sometime ago a discussion thread about the requirement to
have the jars in endorsed dirs also on the classpath.
If endorsed would have been picked up then this would not be necessary.
It is still possible to get
Is it possible we can get the status emails back in place? The last
one we got seemed to be a good conversation starter.
-David
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-14?page=comments#action_12438524
]
Piyush Agarwal commented on DAYTRADER-14:
-
Matt, Chris, David
DatabaseMetaData is implemented by JDBC drivers and allows you to check which
DB you are
On Sep 28, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Heinz Drews wrote:
There was sometime ago a discussion thread about the requirement to
have the jars in endorsed dirs also on the classpath.
If endorsed would have been picked up then this would not be
necessary.
It is still possible to get xerces as the parser
There was sometime ago a discussion thread about the requirement to
have the jars in endorsed dirs also on the classpath.
If endorsed would have been picked up then this would not be necessary.
It is still possible to get xerces as the parser because of including
it on the classpath.
It would no
There is a lot of text here and I'm a bit confused. FWIU, to use the
trick we used in bootstrap you need the following:
1) add your endorsed jars to the manifest class path
2) no code accessed during the boot process can reference an endorsed
package
3) modify the endorsed system property
4
I think I have written something confusing.
The intention of my remark was that somebody might have thought that
the new xml spec have been used but that this was not the case.
Effectively what you have written in your message.
On 9/28/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heinz Drews wrot
Yeah, tricky column. Should we have a separate release roadmap page for each release?
With some exceptions the "Target Release" column just shows 1.2. I added 1.1.1 because most of the
doc is completed after the "software" is released. I am currently working on v1.1 and v1.1.1 doc
and "hope"
Yep...Tomcat too...
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Are you absolutely sure? How did you verify this?
>
> I am skeptical since we use this switch the xml parser to xerces and
> this is required to pass the tck.
>
> -dain
>
> On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> As I discovered yester
Are you absolutely sure? How did you verify this?
I am skeptical since we use this switch the xml parser to xerces and
this is required to pass the tck.
-dain
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
As I discovered yesterday, the Geronimo use of java.endorsed.dirs
is completely
Thanks Hernan. I put my name next to some items. I wasn't sure how
to determine the target release, though. I'm assuming that column
will undergo some refinement.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 9/26/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I just updated the release roadmap with some doc s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2443?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2443:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2443-v1.2.patch
GERONIMO-2443-v1.2.patch: Before importing, checks if the public key in the
certificate to be impo
Create a new packaging for the geronimo-maven-plugin
Key: GERONIMO-2444
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2444
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Lev
Import CA reply should match the public key in the keystore with that in the
certificate from CA.
-
Key: GERONIMO-2443
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONI
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2413:
--
Assignee: (was: Vamsavardhana Reddy)
Unassigning so that a committer can pickup.
> Add a Certification Authority (CA) portlet to Ger
On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:07 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I decided to try an experiment using the jetty-j2ee Geronimo
assembly.
I deleted the Xerces jars from the lib/endorsed directory. I did
this
to convince myself that the java.endorsed.dirs me
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-607?page=comments#action_37033 ]
Robert Ottaway commented on SM-607:
---
The problem can be recreated pretty easily. Use a fresh install of Smix. Start
Smix and tail the output. Change to the SMIX_HO
Hi Ryan,
That's great and I think the cwiki is the right place to host it. 20+ pages is
not a lot for a section as long as we keep it well organized ;-)
If you want to I can give you some advise on how to structure things in
Confluence.
Using other "format" than cwiki will divide the documentat
--- Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I decided to try an experiment using the jetty-j2ee Geronimo
> assembly.
> I deleted the Xerces jars from the lib/endorsed directory. I did
> this
> to convince myself that the java.endorsed.dirs mechanism was working
> correctly and the probl
Heinz Drews wrote:
The endorsed dirs are prepended to the bootclass path.
Correcting the current situation should not cause classloading
problems. It might cause a problem because now the newer of the xml
specs are used instead of the one contained in the JRE.
Geronimo was already placing jars i
Files dropped into the install directory sometimes result in a "file in use by
another process" error
-
Key: SM-607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/
The endorsed dirs are prepended to the bootclass path.
Correcting the current situation should not cause classloading
problems. It might cause a problem because now the newer of the xml
specs are used instead of the one contained in the JRE.
If we use a mechanism like the one used by Eclipse the
I would assume that using a command line parm provides greater
flexibility than extracting it from a manifest.
Even if we would use the approach to spawn a new JVM.
Heinz
On 9/28/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I discovered yesterday, the Geronimo use of java.endorsed.dirs is
com
On 9/28/06, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I should be possible to accomplish what Daemon is doing by forking a new
process to run the actual server, but I'm not sure that's really a good
idea.
So, that's the basics. Right now, I'm working on fixing up the scripts
and removing the non-
As I discovered yesterday, the Geronimo use of java.endorsed.dirs is
completely broken. There's code in
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon that appends information from the
Geronimo manifest file to the system properties java.endorsed.dirs and
java.ext.dirs, with the expectation that those
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413?page=comments#action_12438389
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2413:
---
Don't forget to apply GERONIMO-2436-v1.2.patch before trying the CA portlet.
> Add a Certificati
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How come every-time I send email that is not filled with smilies that
everyone thinks I hate everyone?
I don't know how others see it but to me your tone sounded harsh a
couple of times in the past, esp. when the build aspects were
discussed
Um... TeX or Docbook is probably much more "universal" in the open
source world than any bloated, expensive and buggy microsoft
unstableware.
And, while I think architecture docs are great... they tend to become
outdated very quickly, especially as we keep changing the internals
of the se
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2430?page=comments#action_12438378
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2430:
Why were m2 poms published for G builds that are not using m2? That is really
confusing to me. Who is mainta
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Custom packaging or lifecycle phase bindings
-
The geronimo-maven-plugin (g-m-p) goals like start/stop server,
deploy/undeploy modules will be executed in each of these pom.xmls.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2413:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2413.patch
GERONIMO-2413.patch:
Certification Authority portlet with the following functions:
1. Setup Certificatio
69 matches
Mail list logo
