Hi,
Does anyone know what's wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ deploy/assemble
Listing configurations from Geronimo server
Connecting to Geronimo server: localhost:1099
Username: system
Password: ***
Connection established
no category
1: Geronimo Plugins, Monitoring :: Agent DataSource (2.1)
Geronimo Revision: 627677 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 14/02/2008, at 2:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1
I tested the Tomcat JEE version and was able to deploy DayTrader
2.0 and run through all scenarios.
pgp signatures verified ok
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 10 15:21:19 2008 EST using DSA key ID
86859358
gpg: Good
Plan Creator suppresses exceptions rather than showing it to user
-
Key: GERONIMO-3850
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3850
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
+1
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.1 release candidate for your review and vote. I've
also prepared a 2.1.1 TxManager release candidate for review and vote.
For simplicity, I'm holding a single vote for both releases. The
Geronimo server release is dependent upon the TxManager
Plan Creator cannot recognize classes inside compressed JARs of WEB-INF/lib
---
Key: GERONIMO-3851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3851
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMO-3851:
--
Attachment: jaxws-calculator-war-2.1-SNAPSHOT.war
Test web-app for the failing
+1
++Vamsi
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.1 release candidate for your review and vote. I've also
prepared a 2.1.1 TxManager release candidate for review and vote. For
simplicity, I'm holding a single vote for both releases. The
+1
Looks good except for the Plugins portlet which is not working for
me. Several actions in that portlet lead to:
javax.portlet.PortletSecurityException: No Supported
org.apache.pluto.driver.services.container.PortletURLProviderImpl.setSec
ure(PortletURLProviderImpl.java:67)
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 10:39 AM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so I'll start updating the tutorial then.
I'll put it in a new home under Tutorials - EJB applications.
You mean the 5-minute tutorial? I'm fine with it.
yes, I retested/updated it and put it
you need a 1.5 JDK to compile the source in trunk because of the annotations
for EE5... if you want to use JDK 1.4.X and J2EE 1.4, i would suggest
looking at the 1.2 branch.
hope this helps...
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, B.J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've run into a problem with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568955#action_12568955
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3728:
Thanks Joe!
Looks like this will give
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things that I haven't seen mentioned, yet:
EE 6 -- we should be seeing an initial EE 6 spec, soon. As other
projects begin implementing EE 6 capabilities, I expect that we'll be
rolling them into Geronimo. There are
Dan Becker wrote:
I have difficulty taking the updated class back to the runtime to further
debug it.
Thanks for all the pointers and suggestions. I have updated the Development
Wiki to include a section on how to update your runtime for Eclipse:
Chris, that's actually part of what's confusing me. I only have the 1.5
JDK installed. However, when I do a mvn help:effective-pom, it looks
like it is trying to use the 1.4 jdk for javadocs (see source line)
reporting
outputDirectorytarget/site/outputDirectory
plugins
plugin
Classpath entries to resources in SharedLIb incorrect causing them not to be
found when running on the Geronimo server
--
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282
I just downloaded the jee5 tomcat assembly and tried the new
start-server and stop-server commands on winxp. The stop-server
commands shutdown the server with a wrong password!
C:\working\gt21\binstop-server
Stopping Geronimo server: localhost:1099
Username: system
Password: *
Shutdown request
Lin Sun wrote:
I just downloaded the jee5 tomcat assembly and tried the new
start-server and stop-server commands on winxp. The stop-server
commands shutdown the server with a wrong password!
C:\working\gt21\binstop-server
Stopping Geronimo server: localhost:1099
Username: system
Password: *
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282.
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved with change to
Hey, you're not supposed to modify the contents of a Tag.
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mcconne
Date: Thu Feb 14 07:56:36 2008
New Revision: 627785
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=627785view=rev
Log:
GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282 Fix duplicate folders in resource classpath entries
No, I didn't change the server defaults... I can try changing the
defaults and report back.
Lin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lin Sun wrote:
I just downloaded the jee5 tomcat assembly and tried the new
start-server and stop-server commands on winxp.
Mail misses header (blank subject and sender label not defined)
---
Key: GERONIMO-3852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3852
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Geronimo Revision: 627750 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Also, I found something interesting with the start-server command. If
I issue the start-server command to start the server, then I can
shutdown the server using the shutdown.bat or admin console.
However, there is no change in the start-server window which it still
says Geronimo Application
With our 2.1 distribution (as with earlier distributions) we are only
providing the javaee5 minimal assemblies. Are we ever planning to
make the geronimo-framework assembly available in a distribution so that
a user could start from scratch (not even a web container) and build up
a server
Ok if I change the default, then I won't be able to shutdown the
server using stop-server (with the correct or wrong credential). In
this case, only shutdown.bat/sh works.
Lin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I didn't change the server defaults... I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-3852:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Mail misses header (blank subject and sender label not
Folks,
For the past few weeks I've been working on the Concurrency Utilities
for Java EE specification implementation. The Concurrency Utilities
for Java EE specification is a draft specification (see
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrencyee-interest/ for more info)
that is supposed to replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569005#action_12569005
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3847:
I'm not sure what I think about the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569007#action_12569007
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-3852:
Could you attach a sample program that
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
With our 2.1 distribution (as with earlier distributions) we are
only providing the javaee5 minimal assemblies. Are we ever
planning to make the geronimo-framework assembly available in a
distribution so that a user could start from scratch
Yes, can you file a bug on it?
I was able to mostly bypass this (and another error) by specifying
some version and artifact name (-v and -a).
Jarek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what's wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569013#action_12569013
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3847:
---
I'm totally ok with removing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3802:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: Joseph Leong)
In plugin installer, assembling a server,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, can you file a bug on it?
I would have, but I didn't know what area it belonged to. Is it a
gshell or geronimo issue?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aman Nanner updated GERONIMO-3815:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3815-3.debug.patch
The error occurred in the getCurrentPrincpal()
Sorry. Geronimo.
Jarek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Jacek Laskowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, can you file a bug on it?
I would have, but I didn't know what area it belonged to. Is it a
gshell or geronimo
Incompatibilities between Geronimo javamail MailDateFormat and Sun version.
---
Key: GERONIMO-3853
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3853
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569028#action_12569028
]
Cédric Champeau commented on GERONIMO-3852:
---
Ok, I managed to reproduce the
As much as I would like to see this new flavor out it wouldn't be the same if
nobody knows how to use it.
Yes, you all guessed right, I'm again around the documentation. Who is volunteering to do some explaining thingy ?
This is not a small deal, if we release this new distro we need to make
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. sorry for trying these late - i just got back from a long long leave...
No need to worry. Do whatever you can and your time permits. Even
late-runners have something to say and their voice counts. Report any
issue you run
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, can you file a bug on it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3854
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, the cool thing is that this implementation might become the
official Reference Implementation (RI) for this spec. I've talked with
the IBM co-spec lead and there is a good chance of that happening if
we also commit
It would be nice to have this alternative available in the next releases.
Would this later become the new minimal dist? I mean the framework is as
minimal as minimal can get, right!?
In any case, we'll need to fill the documentation gaps we are having today
around the plugin architecture, how
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good except for the Plugins portlet which is not working for
me. Several actions in that portlet lead to:
javax.portlet.PortletSecurityException: No Supported
Hi Paul,
Have you reported it in JIRA? I could find
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
With our 2.1 distribution (as with earlier distributions) we are
only providing the javaee5 minimal assemblies. Are we ever
planning to make the geronimo-framework assembly available in a
deploy/assemble and ERROR GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous method overloading
for method org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Artifact#init
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569043#action_12569043
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3802:
---
Committed the patch to trunk (revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3854:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
deploy/assemble and ERROR GroovyRuntimeException: Ambiguous
Good question :-) I opened:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855
Best wishes,
Paul
On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Paul McMahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good except for the Plugins portlet which is not working
PortletSecurityException in Plugins portlet
---
Key: GERONIMO-3855
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3856:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.1
2.1
It also affects the 2.1 and 2.1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3802:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.1)
2.2
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
With our 2.1 distribution (as with earlier distributions) we are only
providing the javaee5 minimal assemblies. Are we ever planning to
make the geronimo-framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong resolved GERONIMO-3802.
Resolution: Fixed
Assembly page committed, further improvements will be applied at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569066#action_12569066
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3854:
---
Here are the additional problems:
By
Sounds good to me.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:06:43
To:Geronimo Dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Concurrency Utilities for Java EE
Folks,
For the past few weeks I've been working on the Concurrency Utilities
for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569070#action_12569070
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3815:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569075#action_12569075
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3844:
This is not a problem in trunk ... checking 2.1
Assemble a Server Confirmation Page
---
Key: GERONIMO-3856
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3856
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569064#action_12569064
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3854:
---
The problem can be avoided by passing an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee reassigned GERONIMO-3846:
-
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Just to put it on your radar... Thanks!
cookies are not
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Even if the RI thing does not work out or this specification does not
become part of Java EE 6, I still think this functionally would be a
good addition to Geronimo.
What do people think? Thoughts, any concerns?
Agreed. I think it would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569086#action_12569086
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-3836:
---
It does, but only when I'm in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569081#action_12569081
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3836:
gsh should work fine on cygwin...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569091#action_12569091
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3844:
Loooks like this isn't an issue with the 2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reopened GERONIMO-3802:
---
I think there is a smal problem with this change. I've noticed the following
error on Tomcat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569101#action_12569101
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3836:
kay, I'll fire up my virtual machine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569111#action_12569111
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3836:
---
I was able to replicate this problem with
Geronimo Revision: 627860 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080214
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Are you also going to check this into the 2.1 branch? The JIRA shows
that it was fixed for 2.1.1, but trunk is 2.2.
-Donald
Jarek Gawor (JIRA) wrote:
[
You mean rev 627838? Yes, was planning to but discovered a small problem.
Jarek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you also going to check this into the 2.1 branch? The JIRA shows
that it was fixed for 2.1.1, but trunk is 2.2.
-Donald
Jarek
+1
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
With our 2.1 distribution (as with earlier distributions) we are only
providing the javaee5 minimal assemblies. Are we ever planning to
make the
Hi,
This is really great news.
I very quickly browsed the specifications and I have a couple of
questions:
1. Is there a way to define task dependencies? For instance, I should
be able to queue a task B which will only be executed after the
execution of task A as task B depends on task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3854.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
I changed the gshell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569172#action_12569172
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3807:
---
Well, I think this should be a code
All,
This vote passes with 16 +1 votes and no others.
Woo hoo! Great work everybody!
I'll get to work getting the binaries pushed out. Takes a while for
syncing with the Apache mirrors. So, will be a couple days before set
things up on our web site.
Meantime, let's keep going with the doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3802.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.1
I resolved the problem by making
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569183#action_12569183
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3855:
---
I was able to reproduce this problem only
Hmm this seems bad. I was able to reproduce the problem on port 8443
only but _all_ portlets failed in this way. So the console is pretty
much unusable on port 8443. Can somebody else verify these findings?
Jarek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good
Refactoring a Dynamic Web Project's name doesn't refactor it's artifact id
context root
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-283
URL:
response header parsing is done incorrectly
---
Key: GERONIMO-3857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3857
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
start-server.bat fails to start server if there is a space in the path
--
Key: GERONIMO-3858
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3858
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3857:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3857.patch
A suggested fix
response header parsing is done
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569195#action_12569195
]
Sangjin Lee commented on GERONIMO-3857:
---
There is also an issue of handling folded
85 matches
Mail list logo
