It's really great news!
But I have some questions about current implementation.Just want to learn
more from it.
1) I found only active and starting bundles are taken into account in
current implementation. What about resolved bundles?
2) For lazy activiated bundles, only starting bundles will be
Hi All,
Forrest and I work together and prepared a release candidate of
Geronimo Samples 2.2 for your
review and vote.
This is the second independent release of samples for Geronimo.
Besides some bug fixes,
in this release, there are two new samples added:
1. DataCDInfo -- demo a popular web app
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.2 *
RC3*. Compared to RC2, RC3 contains source code packages, checksum and
signature files for you to review.
You can verify the integrity of the files with KEYS from
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS
The
On 1/25/2010 8:06 AM, Delos wrote:
It's really great news!
But I have some questions about current implementation.Just want to
learn more from it.
1) I found only active and starting bundles are taken into account in
current implementation. What about resolved bundles?
That's the requireme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804545#action_12804545
]
Jack Cai commented on GERONIMO-5040:
If I rememer correctly, the reason that I didn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804553#action_12804553
]
Johannes Weberhofer commented on GERONIMO-5040:
---
I had the impression, the
We should be putting some thought on what the Geronimo deliverables are
in the web profile world. I think for the most part, this should be
just a different assembly that assembles a smaller set of components.
The one additional configuration that is probably going to be needed is
an EJB Lite
Create javaee5 Tomcat assemblies and plugin groups.
Key: GERONIMO-5047
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5047
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: pu
Create an EJB Lite plugin for 3.0 Web Profile usage.
-
Key: GERONIMO-5048
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5048
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601:
---
Attachment: GetnStarted3AG.tar.gz
:-(
Thanks for trying. Here is my lates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5018.
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove -EA- versioning from the JEE6 spec versions.
> -
Hi,
Recently, I am looking at the annoation and web fragment in Servlet
3.0. After checking some integration codes, it seems that we have different
strategy for Tomcat and Jetty, in Tomcat plugin, after doing some
verification and web service process work, Geronimo will pass the web.xml
file d
Add bean validation (JSR 302) to Geronimo 3.0
-
Key: GERONIMO-5049
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5049
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular
Integrate OpenWebBeans into Geronimo 3.0.
--
Key: GERONIMO-5050
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5050
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-5014:
Assignee: Donald Woods (was: Kevan Miller)
These API changes were not in the original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5014.
Resolution: Fixed
reapplied patch, as it was needed inorder to pass the TCK
> JSR-303 a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5049:
---
Summary: Add bean validation (JSR 303) to Geronimo 3.0 (was: Add bean
validation (JSR 302
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-065/
The svn location is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
+1
Passed mvn rat:check.
Passed Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
Notice file in source was updated to include 2010 copyright year.
OpenJPA tests using the API against the RI implementation passed.
-Donald
On 1/25/10 12:52 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bea
On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I am looking at the annoation and web fragment in
Servlet 3.0. After checking some integration codes, it seems that we
have different strategy for Tomcat and Jetty, in Tomcat plugin,
after doing some verification and web service
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
We should be putting some thought on what the Geronimo deliverables
are in the web profile world. I think for the most part, this
should be just a different assembly that assembles a smaller set of
components. The one additional configurat
+1
Built successfully and verified that rat:check passes.
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
> we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804652#action_12804652
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5030:
---
In revision 902507 committed a web extend
Forrest Xia wrote:
After some tries, finally I made daytrader-web-jpa works, see jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-74.
Joe, your version of TradeJPADirect has a small bug in completeOrder
method, see the patch code, I think it could be back port to the
blueprint one :-)
T
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:35 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> We should be putting some thought on what the Geronimo deliverables are in
>> the web profile world. I think for the most part, this should be just a
>> different assembly that assemble
I agree. I think it would good for Geronimo to construct the
metadata-complete web.xml and pass it to Tomcat to handle the rest.
Btw, in TomcatModuleBuilder.addGBeans() there is a bit of code that
(re)writes a web.xml. Does anybody know why is that (still) needed?
The comment above that bit of cod
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I agree. I think it would good for Geronimo to construct the
metadata-complete web.xml and pass it to Tomcat to handle the rest.
Btw, in TomcatModuleBuilder.addGBeans() there is a bit of code that
(re)writes a web.xml. Does anybody know why is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804831#action_12804831
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5041:
rev 903036 disables a ger: binding of j
1. I saw the empty web.xml file also, I would suggest that even if we really
need that file, it should be added by DeploymentContext, not directly write
to repository.
2. Thanks for the suggest of using JAXB, I am sure that it would be easy to
parse/generate xml file. But how about generating a fu
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ivan wrote:
1. I saw the empty web.xml file also, I would suggest that even if
we really need that file, it should be added by DeploymentContext,
not directly write to repository.
2. Thanks for the suggest of using JAXB, I am sure that it would be
easy to par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804865#action_12804865
]
Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-601:
I tried the new package,
Great, looking forward it !
2010/1/26 David Jencks
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> 1. I saw the empty web.xml file also, I would suggest that even if we
> really need that file, it should be added by DeploymentContext, not directly
> write to repository.
>
> 2. Thanks for the su
IMHO, I don't think we should worry about the JAXB conversion now
unless there is no other way to fix the given problem. It might help
things in long long term but right now I think it is important to get
things running first. I especially don't want to debug 2 versions of
all the builders.
Jarek
Hi,
While testing some web applications on Jetty very quickly I ran into
the following NPE (while accessing some jsps):
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.zip.Inflater.ensureOpen(Inflater.java:336)
at java.util.zip.Inflater.getBytesWritten(Inflater.java:296)
at ja
Seems like the problem might be caused by URLResource.exists() calls
as the change in revision 903093 makes these NPEs disappear.
Jarek
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While testing some web applications on Jetty very quickly I ran into
> the following NPE (while a
35 matches
Mail list logo
