Hi all!
A newbie here - Cai Jun Jie. You can also call me Jack!
My teammates and I have been looking at accessibility of Geronimo's Admin
Console. Most people would think that accessibility only matters for the
disabled. Yet some people argue - which I also mostly agree - that if we
As mentioned in my last mail, maybe we can do more work on usability -
Usability
- revamped logging code for some key components
- improve deployment error messages
- simplify plugin and custom assembly creation
* - improve accessibility*
2008/7/6 Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> O
I searched the keyword "label" in all JSP files in an older revision which
is before all the accessibility patches came in, and found no occurrences of
label element. So I assume it's probably safe to remove the label style in
pluto.css. Anyway it's safer if we can use main.css to override pluto.cs
I just examined these two css carefully and found that the only overlapping
style is "body", and the body style in main.css is actuall void. So how
about this - remove the body style in main.css, and then exhange their order
in console\console-portal-driver\src\main\webapp\WEB-INF\themes\head.jsp?
Sorry I overlooked the fact that there is another overlapping style "td". So
my last suggestion is not ideal... How about just to add a label style in
head.jsp to override the one in pluto.css? It's dirty though...
2008/7/15 Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just examined the
avoid mistakes and make it easy to correct mistakes that do
occur.
Jack
2008/7/5 Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Jack,
> Thanks for the information.
>
> I doubt that accessibility was given much (if any) thought during
> development of the console. We'll pr
our proposals soon. Hopefully it will be a good start for v2.2.
Jack Cai
2008/7/30 David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
> I think it would be nicer to create pages with 2.2 specific content
>> somewhere under http://
Before this post sinks, would someone help to put the accessibility
guidelines somewhere in our doc? Maybe in the coding standard? If I can get
the write access (I've signed ICLA), I can do that if no one objects...
Jack Cai
2008/7/16 Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks Keven for
Thanks Joe for all the work here!
After going through the new structure proposed by Rebekah, I would say it is
a "derived" version from 2.1, instead of a whole new structure. So I don't
think somebody familar with the current 2.1 structure would need much time
to get familiar with the new structur
op of
Geronimo. Is this possible with GEP (embed a server with it)?
Jack
Thanks Kevan!
Joe, I guess you recently got the admin access. Can you kindly grant me
write access to our wiki? Appreciate your help...
- Jack
2008/7/31 Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Jack wrote:
>
> Before this post sinks, would someo
t JPA), will we allow the user to select JPA?
- Jack
Thanks so much Joe! I'm now able to edit the pages under [1], but unable to
edit this one [2], where I want to add some guidelines on accessbility.
Would you please grant me write access to that space too?
Jack
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/c
I like all the good ideas here to improve Admin console's usability. Since
Geronimo is often perceived as a lightweight server, we should always keep
usability in mind, especially when we add new functions.
Ivan, maybe you can start a new thread, and give us more details on your
proposal?
-
>
>> Donald's list/grouping seems reasonable. Although I'm not sure that we
>> have to provide redundant EE5 samples to demonstrate compatibility...
>>
>
> Yes, agreed.
>
>
Maybe we just simply state in a readme file that all Java EE 5 samples also
work with G 3.0, instead of duplicating them?
-Jack
Sounds like a good idea, since some users are expecting more frequent
updates. We need to go through the open JIRA list to see what remaining ones
should be fixed in v2.2.1.
-Jack
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We have had a couple of fixes in the 2.2 branch since
Congratulations! Well deserved!
-Jack
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Congrats, Donald!
>
> Forrest
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new
>> member
frequent
scenario.
-Jack
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
> In Servlet 3.0, it is allowed to load the resource from
> META-INF/resources of jar files in the WEB-INF folder while it is not found
> in root folder. But now, in our BundleDirContext, there is not
We depend on SAAJ RI instead of axis2-saaj. I think axis2-saaj implements
SAAJ 1.3, which are used in Geronimo 2.1 (Java EE 5). And I thought Java EE
6 still requires SAAJ 1.3. Can someone shed some light here?
-Jack
Congratulations!
-Jack
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Congrats!!!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats!!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>&
Congratulations!
-Jack
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, han hongfang wrote:
> Congrats! Shawn.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Shawn!
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> On 9/7/10 8:45 PM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>
Congratulations!
-Jack
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, han hongfang wrote:
> Congrats! Forrest,
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your recognition and trust, I will continue the journey
>> on the Geronimo exci
Congratulations!
-Jack
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, han hongfang wrote:
> Congrats! Delos.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>> Congrats!
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>> wrote:
>>
Is someone working on copying 2.1 space to 2.2? :-) If we don't have a
solution for the copy approach, maybe we just let Rebekah and her colleagues
go ahead to manually copy & reorganize...
-Jack
onsidering some
components might be completely replaced with another implementation.
- Jack
2008/8/18 Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:11 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:59 PM,
Is it for debugging purpose? So that people can step in Geronimo source
code... My guess.
-Jack
2008/8/21 Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now that you mention it... I have never done anything with this
> screen. I am not even sure what it is for. Can we remove this screen
>
Thanks Joe for granting me the write access. I've documented the
accessibility guidelines here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Code+guidelines+on+Web+accessibility+(Admin+Console).
It will be good to be a part of the current coding stardard.
-Jack
2008/8/18 Joe Bohn &l
>From a not-a-committer's point of view, the process summarized by Joe makes
good sense to me. :-)
-Jack
2008/8/22 David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Aug 19, 2008, at 6:35 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> Also, on 4/18 David Blevins added this comment in the thread:
to us. So I
would like to get some advice from the Geronimo gurus here - which area do
you suggest us to do more testing for? Are there known problems from you?
Appreciate your help!
-Jack
Thanks Tim! Keen to see GEP to support Java 6. Suppose this is implemented
with GERONIMODEVTOOLS-466, right?
-Jack
2008/8/29 Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Yep, all of the below sound good to me.
>>
>> After G
Hi all,
Do we have TranQL committers here? Please do the favor to commit TQL-11
patch so that we can pull in for Geronimo. Thanks in advance!
- Jack
2008/9/4 Jack Cai (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pull in TranQL SQLServer 2000 and 2005 XA
Hi Lin,
Can we create the framework plugin group for 2.1.x too if this does not take
too much? Thanks in advance!
Jack
2008/10/9 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking at GERONIMO-4226 today.
>
> For a while, we have been recommending users to
Congratulations from me too, Jason!
- Jack
2008/10/22 Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Congrats Jason!
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> All,
>> Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the
>> Geron
mponent;
2. Tray icon that further improves usability.
Eventually we would think to provide this "run as a service" capability for
Linux/Unix platforms, but Windows would be a good start. What do others
think? I'd volunteer to do this job if you think it's worth doing.
-Jack
-4394.
Welcome your further comments.
-Jack
2008/11/3 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> You might also want to check out this old documentation we have -
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/configuring-geronimo-as-a-windows-service.html
>
> I think it would b
been avoiding to do?
- Jack Cai
2008/11/4 Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sounds like a good feature to consider for 2.2.
>
> Maybe we could offer it as an optional plugin, since the current zip/tar
> files are per assembly, which means you would be including it for
> Uni
+1 for Option 2.
2008/11/7 Lin Sun (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645776#action_12645776]
>
> Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4395:
> -
I'm on the Java 6 side. There has to be a point where we drop Java 5. Java 6
has been around for almost 2 years now. It's time to move on.
-Jack
2008/11/7 Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is it possible for us to support Java SE 5 (with certain known
> restrictions) but only
Thanks David! I'll try the plugin approach then.
- Jack
2008/11/6 David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Donald!
>
> So if we make this as a plugin (well, it's really a windows exe), we will
>
Thanks Donald and Jarek! I provided another patch which hopefully fixes the
problem once and for all.
-Jack
2008/11/8 Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, it will, but we ship bin/jpa.jar in all the minimal and jee5
> assemblies, so if someone removes it, then they should expe
I saw your name (Runhua Chi) already in the list here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html. Welcome Jeff!
-Jack
2008/11/11 chi runhua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi, I've been applying for Geronimo document contributor for the last
> several weeks and also sent couples of
+1 from a non-committer. :-)
-Jack
2008/11/20 Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around Dec.
>> 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release.
>>
>> What is everyone
Server catetory? Although
they are not JEE components.
-Jack
2008/11/22 Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Given our Console navigation tree has gotten so large and many "new"
> portlets were added in 2.0/2.1 without doing a proper reorg of what we had,
> I'm proposing t
ver plugins
+ Resources
- DB pools
- JMS resources
- JEE Connectors
+ Security
- (AS IS)
+ Monitoring and Troubleshotting
- Monitoring
- Logs
- Debug Views
-Jack
2008/11/25 Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for your response. My comments in-line below.
>
> -Don
Ha, Jeff, Manu is already a committer here (see
http://geronimo.apache.org/committers.html). But thanks for being so
warmhearted! A successful community need (lots of) warmhearted people :-)
-Jack
2008/11/25 RunHua Chi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Manu,
>
> Before you contribu
Thanks Jeff and Ying! I like the current 2.2 doc overall structure. It's
really task-oriented and easy to consume. It's just that we still have a lot
of TODO items. :-) Still way to go, but very glad to see the progress!
- Jack
2008/11/28 RunHua Chi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&
click the
"subscirbe"/"unsubscribe" links. Makes sense?
-Jack
2008/12/3 Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>
> ++Vamsi
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:23 AM, han hongfang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
e), and only put
server.jar in classpath. Write a simple class which calls "System.exit(0)"
for stopping Geronimo. This works, but only that procrun does not clean up
properly.
Are there other better options? Appreciate your help!
-Jack Cai
I agree with David J. that 1, 2 and 3 should stay in the user doc, maybe as
advanced topics.
-Jack
2008/12/4 RunHua Chi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks David for your comments.
>
> I guess we have some different understandings regarding "Users" of
> Geronimo.My un
code difference, as only one patch is
necessary which fixes a real defect:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-118.
Next I'll start to create the G plugin for this. We can update the contained
EXE files when my patches are accepted by Commons Daemon project.
-Jack
2008/12/5 Jare
If it's for developers, maybe add Maven too.
-Jack
2008/12/16 Donald Woods
> OS+Java 6+FF3+Server+Samples+Eclipse+GEP would be ideal for developers
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Any idea why kinda of images you'd like to see? I
someone
help to review the code and advise how to achieve installation to an
existing server? Thanks!
-Jack
2008/11/6 David Jencks
>
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Donald!
>
> So if we make this as a plugin (well, it's really a windows exe),
advices will be very helpful. Thanks.
Regards
Jack
Thanks. I went through the page before, don't think the options there are
flexible enough to exclude ejb/jpa while keeping tomcat for web app?
-Jack
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> This might provide some useful information:
>
> http://geronimo.apache
fix the create table error, or disable table
creation) Thanks.
Regards
Jack
Thanks.
-Jack
at
the framework level to fine services to be bundled in.
Regards
Jack
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Txs Alan!
>
>
> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project
> basically consists of 2 different things.
> 1.) the Geronimo E
By JAAS's design there is only one CallBackHandler in one LoginContext, so
it's better to write a CallBackHandler that can handle both CallBack here.
I write a small test case to test RI's behavior. It also implements B.
-Jack
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:31 AM, David Jencks wr
Hi Siqi, it's fine! Keep your patches coming in!
-Jack
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Siqi Du wrote:
> I am so sorry for the troubles brought to you. This is my first patch to
> Geronimo, I will check my code more carefully in the future.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at
genesis-java5-flava
2.0-SNAPSHOT
Someone helps to fix that? Thanks!
-Jack
It's an old post:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/Java-dev/2001/Oct/msg01035.html. Not sure
whether it's still relavant.
-Jack
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a way make the server just stop with "Process
> exite
Agreed. Restart should have the same effect as "Stop + Start".
In the "o.a.g.kernel.config.ConfigurationStatus, "gc" is enabled for stop by
default, but there is no gc option (stop parent) for restart. Maybe that's
the place to modify?
-Jack
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009
.
There is some complexity to handle in the
o.a.g.kernel.config.ConfigurationStatus class.
-Jack
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Sometimes, restart is not equal to stop+start. Let's take an example,
> component A is depending on component B.
> While you restart B, Geron
This looks like a problem. You might want to open a JIRA to track it. The
config file is resolved based on the server base dir, which should be
different for the two instances. You can look into
o.a.g.system.serverinfo.BasicServerInfo for more digging.
-Jack
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:50 PM
iguration()". So things are more complex...
-Jack
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:38 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I talked with Aaron Mulder and Dain a bit on IRC -- they originally
> implemented most of this IIRC. We can't remember any reason for restart not
> to create new classloaders.
Agree that weekly basis might be a good interval. Can we just push the
SNAPSHOT of the latest one which passed the testsuite in that week if there
is one? Otherwise publish the latest.
-Jack
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Seems that #4 would be the quickest, since we
I guess RC could also be put into maven central. Worth try that.
-Jack
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Ivan wrote:
> I think 3.0 rc1 is a snapshot build, only released version will be in the
> repo2. So ...
>
> 2009/8/24 Siqi Du
>
>> Thanks, Ivan. I have not found any
Cool!
-Jack
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:40 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I spent some time this weekend updating trunk to use the servlet 3.0, ejb
> 3.1, connector 1.6, and (renamed) jpa 1.0 specs, also jetty 8 I think
> this is almost ready to commit. So please don't start on
Congratulations Rahul! Hope to see you around in future!
-Jack
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:01 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Congratulations! While webservices are not my specialty I'm very glad to
> have the functionality you wrote available in geronimo and I enjoyed working
> with y
I thought it was a problem in my environment...
So yes, we need to use Java 6 to build the trunk.
-Jack
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I guess this means we need to build trunk on java 6?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:20
I think the direction that Rick is picturing is to support the OSGi
programming model in addition to the Java EE programming model. This makes
sense as OSGi is gaining increasing momentun in the enterprise computing
space.
-Jack
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> I am a lit
Have we done a little test to make sure that removing/disabling Tomcat's
JNDI does not break things? If everything looks good, it certainly makes
good sense to do that. :-)
-Jack
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
>I found some configur
We want to retain support for Java 5 in 2.2.
-Jack
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:25 PM, chi runhua wrote:
> Hi, one short question here.
>
> According to Geronimo-4089, G2.2 can be built on Java 6 and it's a new
> feature for G2.2.
>
> why are we still using Java 5 for 2.2
This looks like a very comprehensive list! Thanks Jeff!
I hit some "404 document not found" error when following the links in the
"Topic location" column though.
-Jack
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:45 PM, chi runhua wrote:
> Sorry, here is the correct linkage
>
&
I was looking at some console code and recalled this discussion. With the
NIO buffers and charset utilities we can do the filtering in a stream way.
I'll give it a try.
-Jack
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
> The difficulty I see here is that the output is a byte st
Congratulations Ivan!!
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Congratulations Ivan!
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I would like to welcome Ivan as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
>> invitation to join the PMC. We look forward to work
Cong.!
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Congratulations Shawn!
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I would like to welcome Shawn, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
>> invitation to become a committer. His account (genspring) has been cre
Cong.!
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> I would like to welcome Rex, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
>> invitation to become a committer. We are still waiting for his account to
So looks like it's a random choice...
If there's no particular reasons (like performance etc.), I'd recommend that
we use JMX agent as the default instead of the EJB agent, as the latter has
a dependency on the EJB container.
-Jack
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Sha
I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a JIRA...
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote:
> There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I
> seriously think they need to be addressed. They are:
> https://iss
Then we would also need to change the default option when creating a server
to monitor in the monitoring console. Current default is EJB.
-Jack
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
> "load=false&quo
I finished the patch for the console filter to improve its performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874
Hopefully someone could review it...
-Jack
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Yes, right now we have to use Java 6 to compile trunk.
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Lasantha Ranaweera
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Just noticed that G source cannot be build using JDK5 anymore due to the
> following error. This error will not happen with JDK6. Is this is th
Agreed, since it won't hurt.
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G about the Transaction.commit
> signature is missing the IllegalStateException. The reason why I
> raised this JIRA is because in OSGi RFC 98
I think it's a good idea. A small problem that I see is currently all the
vendor connectors have different version numbers. If we are going to put
them under the same folder, shall we bump them to the same version?
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've b
That's great!
I still hope the patch for GERONIMO-4874 can be committed. Should be a safe
change.
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:26 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> I think things are moving along for 2.2.
>>
>> -
pplication?
* If the latter case, will GBean go away?
* If yes, how much code changes are required? I'd say a lot ...
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:25 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Over the weekend I got my sandbox osgi framework to build and generate all
> the plugins as osgi bundles.
In this case, how do we do the tag? Just tag each invidiual vendor
connector?
-Jack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
>
>
> 2009/9/22 Jack Cai
>
>> I think it's a good idea. A small problem
David, are you working on a new TranQL release in order to include the stale
connection patch?
-Jack
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail.
>
> Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2.
>
>
> -Donald
&g
o categories.
> Donald is making a good point here. And we do need to consider the risk of
> this change. Here are my thoughts for your consideration.
>
Since most people are focusing on G3.0, maybe we should just let G2.2 go.
It'll be good that we push G2.2 out as soon as possible.
-Jack
I think JSR88 is only made optional. So it's not bad to keep it. I agree
with David that we can focus our effort on other things first.
-Jack
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>>
Sure. And we might also want to upgrade Derby, per
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4694
-Jack
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Ivan wrote:
> How about updating myfaces version to 1.2.8 for Geronimo 2.2 ?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Leonardo U
bin.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/procrun/src/main/resources/bin/
-Jack
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <
off...@weberhofer.at> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm actually testing the latest G2.2 Snapshot; in the
eMain(AbstractCLI.java:65)
at org.apache.geronimo.cli.daemon.DaemonCLI.main(DaemonCLI.java:30)
started in .468s
Module 60/75 org.apache.geronimo.configs/myfaces/2.2/car
started in .015s
-Jack
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:27 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Nov 3
I had more tries with different JREs. Below are the findings -
IBM Java 5: always see the exception
IBM Java 6: OK
Sun Java 5: OK
Sun Java 6: OK
So it could be a problem in IBM Java 5. So I don't see this as a blocker for
G 2.2.
-Jack
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Kevan Miller
Looks like the patch for JIRA 3003 never made into the 2.1 branch. Could
someone help to commit that code? Thanks a lot.
-Jack
27;ll create a patch to replace them.
-Jack
./plugins/console/console-filter/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/console/filter/XSRFHandler.java:
private Map sessionMap = Collections.synchronizedMap(new
HashMap());
./framework/modules/geronimo-crypto/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/c
, but it might be better for a committer to
do those changes directly.
-Jack
nteresting to show what other bundles are currently using
a certain bundle?
-Jack
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> OSGI Bundle is a new item for Geronimo admin console and RFC 139 defines
> many Mbeans used to get bundle information in OSGI environment. S
In line below.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Delos wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, Jack. See my reply below.
>
> 1. Better add a "filter" or alike text before textbox D
> I agree it's better to add a label for a textbox. But since there has been
> "sym
1 - 100 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
