m PST
> > Sorry about that...
>
> +1
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> A
ht now if we undeploy a service assembly, its
endpoint still exists, and messages are still routed to it. Could just be a
bug. ; }
I'm sure more discussion on this will follow.
Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
>
> > Su
On 7/25/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/07, Kit Plummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as I can "comment out" the feature at one place I don't mind the
> styleguide stuff. But, you are right...seems like it would be more of a
&
On 7/6/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to start a discussion on splitting the container and
> components release cycles. What do people think about that ?
> Should we keep the container and all the components in a sing
separately from the container ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
Kit Plummer
Advanced Programs
Raytheon Missile Systems
520.360.4729 (cell)
520.545.9346 (desk)
kitplummer (im)Thanks again Jean-Sebastian.
At this point I think Guillaume is correct - we need to look at the SE.
I'm _guessing_ that the current TucsanyRuntime class gets simplified,
or rep
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-445?page=all ]
Kit Plummer closed SM-445:
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Problem, was an older ActiveIO. My bad.
> FactoryFinder in ActiveIO has moved. Breaks FlowProvider.j
Versions: incubation
Environment: Running Ubuntu Breezy. Java1.5.06
Reporter: Kit Plummer
Priority: Blocker
Maven test fails because:
---
Test set: org.test.AppTest
