February(ish) sounds about right. Of course, we'd welcome any help
people might want to provide :)
-Original Message-
From: Bish, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:39 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: activemq-cpp, OpenWire protocol
Just to give everyone a heads up...
Last night I moved over all of the issues related to the activemq-cpp
client into the new ActiveMQ C++ JIRA Project. I've also updated the
changelog on the website to apply the filter against the new project
the resolved issue
to version 1.0.. If the fix for version field is properly assigned
on every issue then they will properly show up on the change long and
road map views of jira.
On 11/17/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to give everyone a heads up...
Last night I moved over
just fine.
Hope this helps.
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Murphree, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:53 AM
To: Mittler, Nathan
Cc: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build failed, looking for maven-jaxb2-plugin
Nate,
I've been having
No - I guess if you're not using a proxy it's a different issue, unfortunately.
BTW - I am building successfully on WinXP. Do you think your problem could be
related to the firewall on XP? I wouldn't think so, but you never know with
windows :)
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard
Thanks!
I just ran a filter in JIRA for any closed or resolved issues in the
ActiveMQ space under CMS ... After looking the ActiveMQ release pages I
was able to figure it out :)
I think moving forward, it might be easier to have AMQ-CPP in it's own
space - that way the filter criteria gets a lot
. Once the ppmc has approved a release, the
release must be approved by at least 3 incubator PMC members.
You should tally the vote and then start a new vote thread on the
general @ incubator mailing list.
On 11/13/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! That'll do it - thanks, guys
A clean build of trunk (with mvn 2.0.4) is failing for me when building
the XMPP module, trying to download the maven-jaxb2-plugin:
https://maven2-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/org/jvnet/jaxb2/
maven2/maven-jaxb2-plugin/0.1/maven-jaxb2-plugin-0.1.pom
The funny thing is that I can view
That line between unit and integration tests can be gray sometimes,
especially when you're unit testing things like the transport classes
which require feedback from the broker. I guess you'd have to make the
decision on a case-by-case basis, otherwise you'd be removing most of
our tests :).
One
Yes - way to go Hiram!
-Original Message-
From: Bish, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 2:09 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: [activemq-cpp] It now compiles under cygwin
BTW - Thanks for tackling this, both Nate and Myself are
That makes sense. I'll give that a shot this evening
- thanks!
From: Guillaume Nodet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 6:31
AMTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Re: CAR plugin
documentation
In your case, you need the following file
to
make doxygen do that.
that's great! Perhaps we just generate the cms docs again
when generating the actimemq ones???
Nate
On 8/3/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea ... I'll take care of that this evening.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Good idea ... I'll take care of that this evening.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hiram Chirino
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:25 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: auto-generating documentation for C++
Right now the CPP client only supports the stomp protocol, which does
not support temporary topics. So it's a limitation of the client in the
fact that it only supports the stomp protocol right now.
You could try one of the openwire clients, which you can get to from the
C Integration page
Hey Hiram,
BTW, I just googled for svn:eol-style and ran across this link
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
I'm guessing I should probably have these settings before I commit? ...
oops! :)
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hi Naveen,
Comments inline ...
-Original Message-
From: Naveen Rawat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:48 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: AMQ production status
Hi James
We have our servers in C/C++. We are trying out available
Hey guys, are we using this?
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRAEXT/JIRA+Subversion+plugin
Seems like it might be a way to bridge between commits and issues.
Nate
I have just submitted a new C++ stomp client to the activemq SVN at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp/
This serves as a full blown replacement for CMS, which didn't fully
implementation of the protocol.
Some of the features this includes are:
1) stomp
Arashad,
Looking at the code, it appears that Tim Bish has implemented
persistence in the activemq-cpp code
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-cpp/
). This is a full-on replacement for CMS, but you'll need v4.0.1 (or
later) of the broker. Unfortunately, I'm not
Hi Naveen,
There are a couple of things that might be causing this.
1) The stomp frame ending characters have changed in recent versions of
AMQ. AMQ now enforces that stomp frames end with \0\n for all commands.
If you have an older version of CMS, and a fairly new version of AMQ
(e.g. 4.0),
confirm that this
is not the case, then it's a bug with how we implemented STOMP in AMQ.
On 7/3/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Naveen,
There are a couple of things that might be causing this.
1) The stomp frame ending characters have changed in recent
versions
All,
Tim Bish and I are just about ready with the new C++ library. It
currently will only serve as a replacement for CMS (stomp C++ client),
but it's architecture supports pluggable connectors, so merging in the
openwire-cpp client code should be fairly easy.
Some of the features include:
1)
Excellent! I'm breathing a sigh of relief :)
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:55 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: STOMP and JMSType
On 6/14/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For map
Sounds good to me.
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:45 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: STOMP and JMSType
On 6/13/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just
CMS is dependent on UNIX pthreads, so in your linker options you'll need
-lpthread
-Original Message-
From: Arshad Ahamad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:26 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linking error for compiling CMS
-
From: Brian McCallister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:20 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: STOMP and JMSType
On Jun 13, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Mittler, Nathan wrote:
James,
I think that's what we're proposing here. I proposed amq-msg-type,
but I
There is already a correlation-id header defined in the AMQ extensions:
http://www.activemq.org/site/stomp.html - I was trying to reuse this
header for the connect handshake. I don't feel that strongly one way or
the other. The name response-id is fine - we'd just have to add
another header to
confusion?
On 6/12/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is already a correlation-id header defined in the AMQ
extensions:
http://www.activemq.org/site/stomp.html - I was trying to reuse this
header for the connect handshake. I don't feel that strongly one way
or
the other. The name
Hiram,
This issue is for an erroneous line feed in the STOMP commands from the
broker. My understanding was that you intended to add the extra
carriage return in the commands. If this is the case, can we just close
this issue?
Regards,
Nate
I don't seem to have the permission to assign issues to myself. Is
there some process for getting issues assigned, or should I just be able
to assign myself any issues I want?
Thanks,
Nate
Excellent - all set. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 2:45 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: permission
On 6/7/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't seem to have the permission
Re-posting to the dev list...
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:21 AM
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Stomp and TextMessage
So, here's my impression of what we need to do (feel free to make
mods)...
1
Hey Hiram,
It's surprising that OS X doesn't support recursive locks - I thought
they were a standard part of pthreads. Even more surprising is when you
try to lock twice from the same thread, it deadlocks itself :)
I am in total agreement about sprinkling #ifdefs around the code - it's
ugly and
-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: openwire-cpp question
There is no test stub either. I am wondering if someone ever tested it?
Vik
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:01 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE
Great - keep me posted. At this point, I'll be happy just to see data
coming back for the bytes message ... no guarantees as to whether the
CMS client processes it correctly :)
Regards,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: STOMP bytes messages
Nate,
This code doesn't support Queues, right?
Thanks!
Vik
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:58 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: STOMP bytes messages
Hi Vik,
We're not quite there yet for integrating CMS and Openwire. For now,
you just have to pick your poison: CMS (stomp) - or the openwire-cpp
client.
Regards,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 1:36 PM
To:
Oops ... sorry about that :). I'm at work right now and don't have
access to the code - I'll get it to you this evening.
Do you have an eclipse environment with the CDT for building C++
projects? ... otherwise I can throw some makefiles together if that's
easier for you. Unfortunately, the
Please define the interfaces that you want to be SP-free!
I'm with Hiram ... I think the entire API should be SP-free. The less
the users have to see SPs, the better.
It's all about the user and helping them come up to speed and use the
api
as quickly and painlessly as possible. I understand
and Mats is ill but will hopefully be back soon to help me into the
project routines... :-/ So maybe it's best if you open a new issue...
/David
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 8 mars 2006 15:57
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: AMQ
a generic ProtocolFormat would
do the trick. What do think otherwise, any other suggestions on how we better
could prepare for the upcoming merge!?
Regards,
Mats
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 6 mars 2006 13:52
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
to make it compile.
Regards,
Mats
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 6 mars 2006 15:23
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: AMQ C#/C++ client refactoring suggestion
I'm still coming up to speed on the C#/C++ client so I'm not prepared
firewall issues
On 28 Feb 2006, at 14:12, Mittler, Nathan wrote:
I'm having problems checking out from svn (in cygwin) ...
bash-3.00$ svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk'
svn: PROPFIND of '/repos
I've have posted my code under JIRA issue AMQ-517 (under ActiveMQ/JMS
Client).
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:02 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: [activemq-dev] c++ api for activemq
I'm sending to both
44 matches
Mail list logo
