Re: MP release train

Hello Yann, With a great pleasure, grab any of the pending tasks you want. Feel free to ask help here if you need any guidance. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: MP release train

Hello, I just saw your posts, as a Meecrowave user, can I join your efforts ? Regards. -- Sent from: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html

Re: MP release train

, microprofile-1.3, microprofile-1.4 (not sure we need them all) poms and associated distros. We can also put the doc here if it sounds simpler. Feedback welcome on that. Doing the aggregator pom i realised we didnt release opentracing, anyone willing to do it? Otherwise I will try to push it next

Re: MP release train

-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 16 juil. 2018 à 08:40, Romain Manni-Bucau > a écrit : > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm planning to release health and openapi very soon (if I can today), >> please shout if there is any blocker. >> >>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

and with my +1 it makes 5 +1 (3 bindings) and no other votes so it passes, thank you all! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github |

Re: [VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

+1 Le mer. 18 juil. 2018 à 15:32, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > tsrub > > > > Am 16.07.2018 um 08:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-health and geronimo-openapi projects (version

Re: MP release train

Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 16 juil. 2018 à 08:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I'm planning to release health and openapi very soon (if I can today), > please shout if there is any blocker. > > Also

Re: [VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

+1 LieGrue, tsrub > Am 16.07.2018 um 08:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-health and geronimo-openapi projects (version 1.0.0 for both). > > The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28133): > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

+1 (non-binding) - Ray On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > It looks good to me. > > Regards > JB > > On 16/07/2018 08:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of > > the

Re: [VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

+1 (non binding) It looks good to me. Regards JB On 16/07/2018 08:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of > the geronimo-health and geronimo-openapi projects (version 1.0.0 for both). > > The dist (dev) area is available at 

[VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

Hi guys, As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the geronimo-health and geronimo-openapi projects (version 1.0.0 for both). The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28133): - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/health/ -

MP release train

Hi guys, I'm planning to release health and openapi very soon (if I can today), please shout if there is any blocker. Also next step is to create the "microprofile" repo to put the bom inside and potentially some prepackaged distro (while it doesn't require "real" coding i

[RESULT][VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

And with my +1 it makes 5 +1 votes with 3 bindings ones. Will continue the release steps. Thank you all guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 01:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 > > Tested on Karzf > Thanks > Regards > JB > Le 27 juin 2018, à 21:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without >> bytecode workaround. Here is the

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

Which makes 4 +1 (3 bindings) and no other votes. I'll proceed with the release steps. Thank you all guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

+1 Thanks Romain Le ven. 29 juin 2018 à 09:02, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > My own +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github >

Re: [VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

My own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 Tested on Karzf Thanks Regards JB Le 27 juin 2018 à 21:18, à 21:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit: >Hi guys, > >XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without >bytecode >workaround. Here is the vote to promote it. > >The dist (dev) area is available at

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 2018-06-27 11:40 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 27.06.2018 um 15:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without > bytecode workaround. Here is the vote to promote it. > > > > The dist

Re: [VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

+1 2018-06-27 12:32 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 > > LieGrue > strub > > > > Am 15.06.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-metrics project (version 1.0.0). > > > > The dist (dev) area

Re: [VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

+1 LieGrue strub > Am 15.06.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-metrics project (version 1.0.0). > > The dist (dev) area is available at >

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 27.06.2018 um 15:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without bytecode > workaround. Here is the vote to promote it. > > The dist (dev) area is available at >

[VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

Hi guys, XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without bytecode workaround. Here is the vote to promote it. The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 27764) The staging repo is:

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Thanks Romain Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 20:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Will reroll without the api to avoid that discussion and to hang the > release 1 month for no technical reason, be ready to vote ;) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com

Re: release specs in bulk

Yes but will require to go through all specs to check existing ones (we cant use geronimo names). Can delay quite a bit the release so fine to do after IMHO. Le mar. 19 juin 2018 21:26, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > do we also want to add the Java9 module info to META-INF/MANIFEST.MF? >

Re: release specs in bulk

do we also want to add the Java9 module info to META-INF/MANIFEST.MF? When we release all of the spec jars anyway we could target this as well, no? LieGrue,strub On Monday, 18 June 2018, 23:04:00 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Never tested at once but already done pushing them

Re: release specs in bulk

e 3 most important of the new profiles I've added, > JavaEE6, JavaEE7, JavaEE8 and I can in theory do it in a batch, but one > thing I'm not sure about is the version handling of the release plugin with > so many modules at play. > > Has anyone ever tried this? Any advice? > > Given

release specs in bulk

handling of the release plugin with so many modules at play. Has anyone ever tried this? Any advice? Given a little more checking and testing I'm thinking of preping and calling a release this week. Thoughs? Sincerely, -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/prof

[RESULT][VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

And with my +1 it makes 3 +1 bindings, thank you all guys, this vote passed. I'll continue the release steps. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 13 June 2018, 20:24:27 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Here we are with the roll #2 of the geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 vote. The dist (dev) area is available at  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 27434)The staging

[VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

Hi guys, As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the geronimo-metrics project (version 1.0.0). The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/metrics/ (rev 27486) The staging repo is:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

And here is my +1 which makes we have 3 bindings positive votes. I'll continue with the release steps. Thank you all. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 11:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 20:24, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > Here we are with the roll #2 of the geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 vote. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 27434) > The staging repo is: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the tck setup. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jcache/ (

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

Hi folks! time to tally the vote. We got the following: +1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Daniel, John, Reinhard, Mark Thanks to all who voted! I'll gonna continue with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > take 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

And my own +1 of course > Am 10.06.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ > > source release is at &

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le ven. 8 juin 2018 à 13:55, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the tck > setup. > > The dist (dev) area is available at &g

[VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

Hi guys, Here we are with the roll #2 of the geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 vote. The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 27434) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1060/ The tag is

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Will reroll without the api to avoid that discussion and to hang the release 1 month for no technical reason, be ready to vote ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 > Am 12.06.2018 um 02:57 schrieb John D. Ament : > > +1 ! > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:43 AM Mark Struberg <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> wrote: > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 ! On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:43 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ > > source release is at > > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 2018-06-11 16:12 GMT-03:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > +1 thanks > > Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau > a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Le dim. 10 juin 2018 17:43, Mark Struberg a écrit : >> >>> Hi folks! >>> >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 thanks Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le dim. 10 juin 2018 17:43, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Hi folks! >> >> take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release >> staging repo is at >> >> https://repository.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Yep, all ready Le dim. 10 juin 2018 20:35, Mark Struberg a écrit : > the api is already dropped in our repo, right? > > If so I'll can do a release re-roll. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 10.06.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

the api is already dropped in our repo, right? If so I'll can do a release re-roll. LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Do we want to reroll this one without the api? Since we are almost done i'd > like to avoid another vote without any chan

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

>>> écrit : >>> > ok then +1 if as we discussed, we will try to push a PR to Eclipse so >>> we can yank the APIs from our repos >>> > >>> > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> a écrit : >>> > Le mar.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

+1 Le dim. 10 juin 2018 17:43, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ > > source release is at > > https://repository.a

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

Hi folks! take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release staging repo is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ source release is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/org/apache/geronimo/config/geronimo-config/1.2/ sha1

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

cancelled due to classloader issue. Will roll a fresh release soon. LieGrue, strub > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I fixed a few missing parts and did run the release steps for > geronimo-config-1.2 > This implements the micropr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

gt; >>> 4b. Use try-with-resource within >>> PropertyFileConfigSource#loadProperties >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 14:02, Romain Manni-Bucau >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

8 Jun 2018 at 14:02, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >> +1, also migrated a few apps from deltaspike and once the API missing >> features worked around it seems working well. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

igrated a few apps from deltaspike and once the API missing > features worked around it seems working well. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le ven. 8 juin 2018 à 13:55, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 8 juin 2018 à 13:55, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> Hi folks! >> >> I fixed a few missing parts and did run the release steps for >> ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

t; | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le ven. 8 juin 2018 à 13:55, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > I fixed a few missing parts

[VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

Hi guys, I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the tck setup. The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jcache/ (rev 27323) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1058

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

Hi folks! I fixed a few missing parts and did run the release steps for geronimo-config-1.2 This implements the microprofile-config-1.3 spec. The staging repository is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1057/ The source zip is under https

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

a PR to Eclipse so >> we can yank the APIs from our repos >> > >> > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau >> a écrit : >> > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >> a écrit : >> > I have checked with the 1.1 release and it

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

; Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau > a écrit : > > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > > I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. > > Looks good to me, but I believe we need to decide about the API stuff > before. >

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

will try to push a PR to Eclipse so we can > yank the APIs from our repos > > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit > : > I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. > Looks good

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a >> écrit : >> >>> I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. >>> Looks good to me, but I believe we need to decide about the API stuff >>> before. &g

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

ok then +1 if as we discussed, we will try to push a PR to Eclipse so we can yank the APIs from our repos Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a > écrit : > >> I have checked with the 1.1 release and it p

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0

annibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 21 mai 2018 à 23:10, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Up? > > Le mer. 16 mai 2018 12:12, Romain Manni-Bucau a >

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Le mar. 5 juin 2018 à 09:29, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. > Looks good to me, but I believe we need to decide about the API stuff > before. > Not really, what has been said before is that it was ok to release and then remov

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

I have checked with the 1.1 release and it passes. Looks good to me, but I believe we need to decide about the API stuff before. It is definitely not a bind copy of the sources, as I checked it. But the signatures and the packages are obviously the same. Le dim. 3 juin 2018 à 22:49, Romain

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

Everyone who does work also have a say ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 04.06.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Raymond Auge : > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > IMHO: > > 1. one single release > 2. java 6 is ok > 3. for the exclusion m

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > IMHO: > > 1. one single release > 2. java 6 is ok > 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here > Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all of the above.

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

IMHO: 1. one single release 2. java 6 is ok 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Mass release due to OSGi patches

-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all! How do we deal with those? Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility? I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have. Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

also remove it in the future to ensure we really use the same API. > We will need to discuss it in a dedicated thread cause there are some project and technical concerns dropping it. I will start it tomorrow if nobody beats me at it. > Otoh the release process on Eclipse side is rather 'slo

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

the release process on Eclipse side is rather 'sloppy'. So it's hard to keep the impl up2date without having to compile snapshots of the api locally. LieGrue, strub > Am 03.06.2018 um 17:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > The copied code is very localized, from memory I copied the c

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rma

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

nkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> >>> Le lun. 21 mai 2018 à 23:10, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> a écrit : >>> >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

dIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le lun. 21 mai 2018 à 23:10, Romain Manni-Bucau >> a écrit : >> >>> Up? >>> >> &

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

gt; Up? >> > >> Le mer. 16 mai 2018 12:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'd like to release geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail >>> >>> The dist (dev) area is available at >>&

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Le mer. 16 mai 2018 12:20, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'd like to release geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail >> >> The dist (dev) area is available at >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (r

Re: [MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

Do you have any diff in it or failling tests? It has been validated with the snapshot so if we dont have regressions Im tempted to finish this one. If we have some regressions Ill do. Le sam. 2 juin 2018 22:45, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Can we redo the release with the final vers

Re: Release config?

e sam. 2 juin 2018 à 03:31, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >>>> a écrit : >>>> > >>>> > Config was the last spec to use javax namespace >>>> > >>>> > Le mar. 29 mai 2018 à 14:36, Mark Struberg a >>>> écrit : >>>>

Re: Release config?

ruberg a >>> écrit : >>> >> >>> >> Yes, javax.config is the official namespace for JSR-382. >>> >> >>> >> LieGrue, >>> >> strub >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > Am 29.05.2018 u

Re: [MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

Can we redo the release with the final version of the TCK Yes it passes locally. Le samedi 2 juin 2018, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > If tck pass just push to asf > > For the release, it is pending, waiting for some votes > > Le sam. 2 juin 2018 17:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a &g

Re: [MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

If tck pass just push to asf For the release, it is pending, waiting for some votes Le sam. 2 juin 2018 17:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi, > > Eclipse MP-JWT is out, so I have created a PR to use the latest available > release. > Before I push to Apache, can some one

Re: Release config?

> Le mar. 29 mai 2018 à 14:36, Mark Struberg a écrit >> : >> >> >> >> Yes, javax.config is the official namespace for JSR-382. >> >> >> >> LieGrue, >> >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >> > Am 29.05.20

Re: Release config?

8 à 14:36, Mark Struberg a écrit : > >> > >> Yes, javax.config is the official namespace for JSR-382. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > Am 29.05.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com

[MP-JWT] Upgrade to Eclipse MP JWT 1.1 and release?

Hi, Eclipse MP-JWT is out, so I have created a PR to use the latest available release. Before I push to Apache, can some one quickly review? Also, right after, I'd like to do a release for it. Thoughts? Jean-Louis

Re: Release config?

;> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 29.05.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : >> > >> > Are the api 1-1? If so lets merge the src and avoid a double maintenance >> > and release both at once. >> > >> > What would be our

Re: Release config?

e the api 1-1? If so lets merge the src and avoid a double maintenance > and release both at once. > > > > What would be our mainstream then/after? Javax - is the name still > allowed? > > > > Le mar. 29 mai 2018 20:02, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > JSR-382 EDR-1 will

Re: Release config?

Yes, javax.config is the official namespace for JSR-382. LieGrue, strub > Am 29.05.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Are the api 1-1? If so lets merge the src and avoid a double maintenance and > release both at once. > > What would be our mainstream

Re: Release config?

Are the api 1-1? If so lets merge the src and avoid a double maintenance and release both at once. What would be our mainstream then/after? Javax - is the name still allowed? Le mar. 29 mai 2018 20:02, Mark Struberg a écrit : > JSR-382 EDR-1 will be released soon. Currently preparing. >

Re: Release config?

JSR-382 EDR-1 will be released soon. Currently preparing. And mp-config is to follow soon. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 19:48:31 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hmm Is configjsr anything real (ie with a release coming within 2-3 months)? If not let use mp as mainstream until

Re: Release config?

Hmm Is configjsr anything real (ie with a release coming within 2-3 months)? If not let use mp as mainstream until it is the case. We can still release both with shade plugin until they diverge. Le mar. 29 mai 2018 19:39, Mark Struberg a écrit : > The api is effectively different o

Re: Release config?

/ConfigJSR. Those 2 pretty much derailed from each other, so we will have a hard time to maintain it later. Will do this evening. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 12:16:36 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Any blocker to release config from master? I have a few fixes I'd like

Re: Release config?

will have a hard time to maintain it > later. > > Will do this evening. > > LieGrue, > strub > > On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 12:16:36 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Any blocker to release config from master? I ha

Re: Release config?

to release config from master? I have a few fixes I'd like to be able to use ASAP Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Release config?

Hi guys, Any blocker to release config from master? I have a few fixes I'd like to be able to use ASAP Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

[VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Hi guys, I'd like to release geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 26951) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1056

[VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0

Hi guys, I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jcache/ (rev 26950) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1055

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.8 release

+1 >> >> 2018-04-15 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.8. >>> >>> Main changes are: >>> 1. enhancement of multi jar release s

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.8 release

Is this vote closed Romain? It looks good to me but not sure if I'm too late or not. Le lun. 16 avr. 2018 à 18:01, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> a écrit : > +1 > > 2018-04-15 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi! >> >

[RESULT][VOTE] XBean 4.8 release

<rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.8. >> >> Main changes are: >> 1. enhancement of multi jar release support >> 2. upgrade of asm to 6.1.1 (note it doesn't enable directly java 11 >> support but

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.8 release

+1 2018-04-15 12:01 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > Hi! > > Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.8. > > Main changes are: > 1. enhancement of multi jar release support > 2. upgrade of asm to 6.1.1 (note it doesn't enable directly j

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >