Given these legal problems, I'm cancelling all the votes I've started and will
start a *single* one for all the specs asap.
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guillaume,
> I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be
> missing the requ
Joe Bohn wrote:
Just a heads-up ... I've also encountered some problems in running TCK
with the updated specs. I've posted details on the tck list. So far
there is a possible problem with the JSP spec (or perhaps I just haven't
included it in the geronimo image correctly). I'll post more
i
Just a heads-up ... I've also encountered some problems in running TCK
with the updated specs. I've posted details on the tck list. So far
there is a possible problem with the JSP spec (or perhaps I just haven't
included it in the geronimo image correctly). I'll post more
information here w
On Jan 31, 2008 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm looking at the problem.
> I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
> Try the following:
>
> svn co
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/spe
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install
The javadoc fails :-( and the source jar does not incl
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Something we overlooked, previously, is
> geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c
> license (http://
How are these files supposed to get into the javadocs / sources jars ?
The copy-legal-files copy the two files to the target/classes/META-INF dir and
the jar plugin grabs them when building the final jar, but I don't
really understand
how they should be grabbed by the source and javadocs plugins ..
:-(
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:44:12
To:Geronimo Dev
Subject: problem with spec releases
Guillaume,
I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be
missing the required license
Guillaume,
I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem
to be missing the required license and notice files.
Not sure what might have changed, build-wise. The previous versions
contain them -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar and
geronimo-annotation_1.0
10 matches
Mail list logo
