On 29/10/2011 10:02, Tim Ellison wrote:
I will start a vote (on a new thread) for you to express your
opinion.
Last call for votes -- please either cast your vote now on the voting
thread, or let me know you want more time.
Regards,
Tim
Gmail:sunspid...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Moving Apache Harmony to the Attic
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias
Parts of the Harmony classlibs live on in Mika too, and maybe ultimately
parts of DRLVM too.
I recognise the inevitability of this move, but I can't bring myself to
vote for it.
Harmony proved a lot of things, including the applicability of the Apache
model to a huge project involving engineers
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the
responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2].
There has been no significant activity in Apache Harmony since, so it
would seem appropriate to make the
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn repo.
Thx,
Matthias
On Saturday, October 29, 2011, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new
Am 29.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Tim Ellison:
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the
responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2].
There has been no significant activity in Apache Harmony since,
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn repo.
The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked
read-only, so anyone can still obtain the code to use
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn repo.
The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked
read-only,
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn
Android's core libraries are derived from Harmony. In my mind that makes
Harmony one of Apache's most successful projects.
Occasionally Android developers are confused about which project they
should report bugs to. Moving Harmony to the Attic prevents
Android-specific bugs from going to the
В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет:
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will
On 29/10/2011 12:18, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Tim Ellison:
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the
responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2].
There has been no
On 29/10/2011 15:59, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет:
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds
В Sat, 29/10/2011 в 16:49 +0100, Tim Ellison пишет:
On 29/10/2011 15:59, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет:
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org
wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim
14 matches
Mail list logo
