Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfigPerl.pm

2001-09-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Stas wrote: and what's the user of $class? When you can access it via __PACKAGE__ and you don't really need it anyway. __PACKAGE__ is not helpful if one day a test .pm wants to inherit APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE from another class. most of the

Re: How to deal with PerlModule?

2001-09-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Gary Benson wrote: Hi all, In the config we maintain a list of modules, both compiled in and loaded via LoadModule, which is build in TestConfigParse.pm. I've been trying to figure out how to deal with modules loaded via PerlModule? For LoadModule ones it knows that mod_.so = mod_.c and

Re: How to deal with PerlModule?

2001-09-17 Thread Gary Benson
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: Gary Benson wrote: Hi all, In the config we maintain a list of modules, both compiled in and loaded via LoadModule, which is build in TestConfigParse.pm. I've been trying to figure out how to deal with modules loaded via PerlModule? For

Re: Initial version of website up...

2001-09-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/test/ Feedback, patches, commits welcomed. It's something. -- justin I'm not sure what's the best way to link to it, but I've started working on the writing tests with the perl framework doc, and it's a part of the mod_perl documentation

Re: Initial version of website up...

2001-09-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:26:40AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: I'm not sure what's the best way to link to it, but I've started working on the writing tests with the perl framework doc, and it's a part of the mod_perl documentation project. The source can be seen here:

Re: Initial version of website up...

2001-09-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/modperl-docs/src/devel/writing_tests/writing_tests.pod I'm not familiar enough with perl, but is there a way to get a POD file as an HTML file? -- justin There's a utility called pod2html ... :-) --Cliff

Re: Fw: Regarding lower-case HTML tags

2001-09-17 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:19:27AM -0400, Greg Marr wrote: The reason it does that is that XML is case-sensitive for tag names, and the HTML working group chose to use lowercase for XHTML. Thus, if the pages were ever to be marked as XHTML, they'd need to be lowercase. The XHTML

borken file permissions on daedalus (fwd)

2001-09-17 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
-- 2nd Fwd message -- Subject: RE: Output from cron command Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:37:07 +1000 From: Andrew Kenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jose Manuel Macias Luna' [EMAIL PROTECTED] please forward these responses into [EMAIL PROTECTED] as if you email this list it only gets

Re: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate

2001-09-17 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Did not someone make a patch for this early after the feature was in IE 4? Dw On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote: I just noticed a feature of IIS 5.0 which is (if I am correct) impossible to do with Apache (1.3/2.0), albeit very useful. It is the the possibility to use multiple

[PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for graceful restarts (except on Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0). As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think his veto can be overriden. But, I do want to post this before I commit it as it is a widespread change and

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: This should resolve Roy's veto by switching back to SIGUSR1 for graceful restarts (except on Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0). As I don't think you can veto a veto (call a vote?), I don't think his veto can be overriden. Nope; he has to be convinced to retract it. :-)

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:57:32AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on different platforms, all of the signals should be the same. Roy's -1 on SIGWINCH: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3e Roy's comment on making it configurable: http:[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still completely bogus. Ryan On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:57:32AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on

[PATCH] worker MPM patch: short-and-sweet

2001-09-17 Thread Aaron Bannert
After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs, but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right now, and so I can provide some more tweaks I've been working on (turn the LIFO queue to a

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ryan Bloom wrote: This is completely BOGUS! If I have a farm of web servers running on different platforms, all of the signals should be the same. Oh, bah. 'Windows.' 'VMS.' 'MacOS' (not OS X). I agree with Sander that the thing that should be the same is the supported commands to

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still completely bogus. I disagree. It should be SIGUSR1 everywhere. As a compromise, I allowed

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:15 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I know what the mails were about. I am simply stating that it is still completely bogus. I

Re: [PATCH] Switch back to SIGUSR1 and use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0

2001-09-17 Thread Bill Stoddard
My opinion is that we should support this patch (in concept, not reviewed in detail) or not support Linux 2.0 with glibc 2.0. Bill - Original Message - From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:53 PM Subject: [PATCH] Switch back

Doc on writing 2.0 modules

2001-09-17 Thread RCHAPACH Rochester
Is there any doc anywhere on writing modules for Apache 2.0? Rob Simonson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Doc on writing 2.0 modules

2001-09-17 Thread Joshua Slive
-Original Message- From: RCHAPACH Rochester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Is there any doc anywhere on writing modules for Apache 2.0? There is some stuff at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/ Any contributions or updates to this collection are welcome. Joshua.

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

2001-09-17 Thread Ryan Bloom
module AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA cgi_module; +/* There has to be a better place to put this - uhm... where exactly? */ +/** + * Reprocess the command and arguments to execute the given CGI script. + * @param cmd Pointer to the command to execute (may be overridden) + * @param

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.h mod_cgi.c

2001-09-17 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Bill. just a little nit. Doxygen doesn't use @tip (replace with either @warning/@remark) or @deffunc (not required). On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 15:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe 01/09/17 15:12:50 Modified:modules/generators mod_cgi.c Added: modules/generators

New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread Jon Travis
I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the keepalive for the client to 0, and registering a cleanup on the request_req pool. Unfortunately the code in there is somewhat bulky, so any subsequent

Re: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Travis wrote: I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the keepalive for the client to 0, and registering a cleanup on the request_req pool. Unfortunately the code in

Re: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread Jon Travis
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:01:21PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Travis wrote: I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the keepalive for the client to 0, and

Re: [PATCH] worker MPM patch: short-and-sweet

2001-09-17 Thread Brian Pane
Aaron Bannert wrote: After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs, but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right now, and so I can provide some more tweaks I've been working on (turn

Re: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 17 September 2001 03:52 pm, Jon Travis wrote: Why can't you do it in the log_transaction phase. Assuming this is not a keepalive connection, the client will be gone by the time that phase is run. If this is a keep-alive transaction, then you won't save anything by adding another

RE: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
IMHO, It would also be a *hack* - it depends on what that code does.. It just doesn't seem logical for me to do something that's not log_transaction concerned during that phase.. -Madhu -Original Message- From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 4:12

Re: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread Jon Travis
I tried setting keepalive == 0 in the handler, and doing my ju-ju in the log_transaction phase. The client was still hanging around. -- Jon On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:11:58PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: On Monday 17 September 2001 03:52 pm, Jon Travis wrote: Why can't you do it in the

new developer

2001-09-17 Thread Pavel Zaitsev
Hi, I am would like to participate in 2.0 development, whatever I can do. However I wonder if there cookbook style page, on 2.0 or apache development in general, where I can learn how to post patches, extract them from my code? I see people posting patches all the time, they assume that patches

Re: new developer

2001-09-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:34:04PM -0700, Pavel Zaitsev wrote: Hi, I am would like to participate in 2.0 development, whatever I can do. However I wonder if there cookbook style page, on 2.0 or apache development in general, where I can learn how to post patches, extract them from my code? I

Re: new developer

2001-09-17 Thread Ben Hyde
Pavel Zaitsev wrote: Hi, I am would like to participate in 2.0 development, Welcome, neat. whatever I can do. Generally people work on what interests them, or you can look in the STATUS file for things what need attention. However I wonder if there cookbook style page, on 2.0 or

problem with ap_config.h,v in repo??

2001-09-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
I just tried to pull up this: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/include/ap_config.h?annotate=1.66 And got this: Python Exception Occurred Traceback (innermost last): File /home/gstein/viewcvs/lib/viewcvs.py, line 2231, in run_cgi main() File

[Fwd: httpd-2.0 nightly build log]

2001-09-17 Thread Ian Holsman
mod_cgi seems to be a bit borked. Original Message Build started Mon Sep 17 19:00:00 PDT 2001 on Linux 2.4.3-12smp Checking out httpd-2.0 apr apr-util httpd-proxy httpd-test Building httpd-2.0-nightly Merging package apr Merging package apr_util Merging package httpd_proxy

Re: New post-log-transaction hook?

2001-09-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Jon Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:32 PM I tried setting keepalive == 0 in the handler, and doing my ju-ju in the log_transaction phase. The client was still hanging around. That sounds right ... the lazy disconnect logic in httpd can leave a connection

Re: [Fwd: httpd-2.0 nightly build log]

2001-09-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:41 PM On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: mod_cgi seems to be a bit borked. See if my commit fixed it for you as well... it did for me. It seems to have just been a constness problem in disguise. Entirely