Currently config directory processing isn't very useful in practice
because all files in the config dir are loaded - so if you use an editor
which creates backup files, the backup file will still be loaded.
A simple way to fix this is to only load files in the config dir which
match the pattern
Joe Orton wrote:
Currently config directory processing isn't very useful in practice
because all files in the config dir are loaded - so if you use an editor
which creates backup files, the backup file will still be loaded.
A simple way to fix this is to only load files in the config dir
Hi All,
As I know there is a planned config feature to be able to
override the shebang line, but as I know there is no any
result for it, yet:
--
* PR#4241: config
Need to be able to override shebang line to make CGI scripts
more portable.
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 08:02:13AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Currently config directory processing isn't very useful in practice
because all files in the config dir are loaded - so if you use an editor
which creates backup files, the backup file will still be loaded.
Hi!
I'm interested in the module mod_ext_filter. As it is in experimental
phase, it is not included in the windows binaries of 2.0.36. I would
like to ask the people that builds the windows binaries if it will be in
the next version. But, as the next version might not be out for some
time, I
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is an odd one. Has anyone seen this? It's just hanging looking
up the 0.0.0.0 address when it tries to process the config file.
For me, this looks like a showstopper. But, I can't spend much
time on this for a few days, so I'm not a lot of
-0.9. Whoever said we were deprecating them? I thought the plan was that
apachectl would continue to accept 'start|stop|restart' and would pass
them as 'httpd -k $ARGV' to Apache. That is what apachectl does
currently. Yes, you *could* say apachectl -k start with the new code and
it
Cheers Ryan, that was the function I was looking for. :P
The patch has now been updated to use the apr_tokenize_to_argv function.
Tested and working fine on RH7.1.
Incidentally, what is the best source of documentation/information on the
apr and apr-utils supplied functions? I'm currently
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-0.9. Whoever said we were deprecating them? I thought the plan was that
apachectl would continue to accept 'start|stop|restart' and would pass
them as 'httpd -k $ARGV' to Apache. That is what apachectl does
currently. Yes, you *could* say
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-0.9. Whoever said we were deprecating them? I thought the plan was that
apachectl would continue to accept 'start|stop|restart' and would pass
them as 'httpd -k $ARGV' to Apache. That is what
Very interesting bug; we definately need to tweak the location
to Neutral in order to stay compliant with the HTTP spec.
Dunno what other side effects this solution could impart.
Bill
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9427
bad negotiation when started with LANG=cs_CZ
---
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
It seems that the thing named apachectl has become something very
very different from what it was created to be. The need to set certain
environment variables before running httpd, and the need for a
wrapper script that provides standard command line
At 12:31 PM 5/27/2002, you wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-0.9. Whoever said we were deprecating them? I thought the plan was
that
apachectl would continue to accept 'start|stop|restart' and would pass
them as 'httpd -k $ARGV' to Apache. That is what apachectl
On Mon, 27 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
- Having two different sets of arguments for httpd and apachectl is
confusing and difficult to document
How so? How is this different from syntax differences between any
other two commands? Here is a wrapper used by administrators for
five
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Mon, 27 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
- Having two different sets of arguments for httpd and apachectl is
confusing and difficult to document
How so? How is this different from syntax differences between any
other two commands?
I just did a quick update on the mod_proxy documentation. But since I
don't really use the proxy myself, and I haven't looked at the code in
depth, I can only go so far.
We really need one of the proxy gurus to take a look at the
documentation when they have time so we can eventually get rid
Can it be assumed that calling apr_dso_load() twice for the same shared
object, will not re-open that file, but just returns the same handle?
I know that under dlopen platforms (most of the UNIXes), it is true.
If it isn't true under other platforms, then it may help to manage a
list of the
[copying the APR dev list]
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:55:14AM +0300, Eli Marmor wrote:
Can it be assumed that calling apr_dso_load() twice for the same shared
object, will not re-open that file, but just returns the same handle?
LoadLibrary*() on Windows does reference counting, and same goes
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 05:51, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 08:02:13AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Currently config directory processing isn't very useful in practice
because all files in the config dir are loaded - so if you use an editor
which creates
19 matches
Mail list logo
