> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16.03.2003 21:45:12 >>>
>>Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Then your idea to use "'s and have only one check is probably a
solution
>or we can have an extra option to specify how this "require user User1
User2 .."
> to be interpreted - as a single value or as a list
Hello,
Our web servers have been running on apache 2.0.44 for testing, and I want
to switch over to
version 2 but, when I check out my error logs, find many "Network is
unreachable: connecting to listener"
errors. Since we have a Cisco switch in front of the servers I am
suspicious that we get
At 06:54 PM 3/16/2003, Dave wrote:
>When are we going to start seeing httpd 2.1.x releases? httpd 2.0.x releases were
>coming out about two years before a GA release. What is the plan for 2.1.x
>functionality?
We will have no 2.1.x-gold releases, the 2.1-dev tree is (by definition) -beta.
So we
At 04:36 PM 3/14/2003, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>this is a summary for further discussion on the fd leak problematic in
>httpd-2.0 and related apr (inherit) code.
Again, thanks. This post focuses on the httpd aspects, presuming
all of your issues in APR are addressed by that list, and all that httpd
It looks like nobody has used apxs when httpd wasn't installed yet.
The following code in apxs is bogus:
#allow apxs to be run from the source tree, before installation
if ($0 =~ m:support/apxs$:) {
($httpd = $0) =~ s:support/apxs$::;
}
This takes a path /foo/support/apxs and assigns /foo (a
When are we going to start seeing httpd 2.1.x releases? httpd
2.0.x releases were coming out about two years before a GA release. What is the
plan for 2.1.x functionality?
Just interested! I would like to use mod_dav_lock.
Dave.
Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yavor Trapkov wrote:
>
>> - firstly, it checks if the whole string "User1 User2 .." matches the CN
>> of the
>> authenticated user and as this is a very rear situation it almost always
>> fails so each time we request a page, the WEB server sends a L
Ori Tend wrote:
I'm using apache standard cache configuration (loading mod_disk_cache).
Yet for some reason, apache doesn't write anything to the CacheRoot dir.
Are you sure Apache is allowed to write to your cache directory? Check
the permissions and ownership. Does the cache directory exist? (B
Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
What I have in mind is a module that fits in with our current LDAP
based infrastructure. Currently, LDAP services our mail users, and I
would like to see the Apache mass hosting configuration held in LDAP as
well. In this way, we can just scale by adding more apache serve
Yavor Trapkov wrote:
- firstly, it checks if the whole string "User1 User2 .." matches the CN
of the
authenticated user and as this is a very rear situation it almost always
fails so each time we request a page, the WEB server sends a LDAP
query as this
is never cached as a negative result
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Title: Message
hi,
i know this may not
be the appropriate place to post this, but i've search every corner of th web
and found no answer...
i'm using
apache2.0.44 and linux 2.4.18-3smp #1.apache is connected to tomcat
4.1.18 via mod_jk2.
I'm using apache
standard cache configuration (l
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I tried -DHAVE_OPENSSL as compiler argument in the program
settings with no success.
Let me see if there are any other options.
Hi,
I found it :-)
I have to set HAVE_OPENSSL=1 in the MS Visual C++ 6.0 compiler in the
"project setings" under "progra
it sould be it would be a good thing for apache
-Kyle
www.kyleserver.com
- Original Message -
From: "Yavor Trapkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 12:28 AM
Subject: [patch]2 : mod_auth_ldap doesn't effectively use the cache with
"require user User1
I have posted this patch proposal a week ago and since I got only one reply - how to
get round of the problem, and not any discussins about the problem itself or if my
proposal is reasonable or not for the module development,
I follow the instruction on the DEV page to repost it again.
The LDAP
16 matches
Mail list logo