On Jun 27, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags to remember :) it's easier when all patches
are in the same format :)
Yeah, -p is the only one I actually know, since I often get patches
generated from
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2004/06/27 11:46:03
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestReportPerl.pm
perl-framework/Apache-Test Changes
Log:
Force projects that use Apache::TestReportPerl to implement
report_to() if
On Jun 28, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
that's ok - I have rerolled a new candidate with these changes
incorporated
for you to test ;)
if all looks good to you I'll release.
All tests pass for me. I don't know if this was intentional, but the
new tests I introduced last week aren't
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:39:50PM +0300, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can do that easily:
1) start the server:
t/TEST -start
2) start as many clients as you want (e.g. 3 clients):
t/TEST -run [tests]
t/TEST -run [tests]
t/TEST -run [tests]
Thanks Stas! I was finally able to get my
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 28, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
that's ok - I have rerolled a new candidate with these changes
incorporated
for you to test ;)
if all looks good to you I'll release.
All tests pass for me. I don't know if this was intentional, but the new
tests I
The URL
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.12.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/G/GE/GEOFF/Apache-Test-1.12.tar.gz
size: 120719 bytes
md5: 1db40538fd85be3544de8614552c385d
--Geoff
Changes since 1.11:
Force projects that use Apache::TestReportPerl to
Hi All,
I'm pleased to announce the release of MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks
1.12. The only major change over version 1.11 is the conversion of the
build process from ExtUtils::MakeMaker to Module::Build, using the
newly released Apache::TestMB to integrate with Apache::Test. This is
the first
I am working on an Apache::Test based test framework, and being able to pass
extra conditionnal
arguments to t/TEST thru make test would be very much usefull. Since right now,
you can only
turn verbose on or off.
$ make test TEST_EXTRA_ARGS=-port 8899 -debug=gdb
For instance. Otherwise, I end up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check for a NULL file name before trying to delete the file
Is this in STATUS?
Regards,
Graham
--
Dziki za poniszy list
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:02:42 +0200
Jacek Prucia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all: you have picked up a wrong list. Next time please post to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (you might want to subscribe before posting as it is
moderated IIRC).
On 26 Jun 2004 11:49:14 -
Hi all,
I'm reporting this problem here, because apache.bugs seems flooded with
spam.
The way TRUE is defined in some apache headers files is incorrect :
modules/ssl/ssl_expr.h:35:#define TRUE !FALSE
apache/ap_ctx.h:70:#define TRUE !FALSE
apache/ap_hook.h:358:#define TRUE !FALSE
Before one moves on to what I was
told was the real topic of this thread...
Kornl Pl
however this topic is about using
HTTP API in Apache HTTPD.
First let's clear up some ideas. :)
Forgetting about logging for now.
WRowe
I thought the entire point was that it
It being the HTTP.SYS
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking. I haven't proposed any of my
recent changes for backport yet because of the changes required in
include/util_ldap.h. Since util_ldap.h can be considered a public
header, technically any changes to the structure would require an MMN
bump.
Modules (right now, only mod_auth_ldap) depend on util_ldap, and
changing the header would mean a break in binary compatibility (in
theory). I think we should probably stick with an MMN bump for this to
be consistent, even though only the mod_auth_ldap module uses it (to
my
knowledge).
I was
Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow
for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ?
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the MMN bump mainly because that means we can't
backport the changes to the 2.0 branch. If the httpd 2.2 includes a
caching_util module then the only reason for these stabilization patches
is the 2.0 branch. Also, if there are any other modules that do
Joshua Slive wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow
for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ?
I don't understand. apachectl -v and apachectl -V work fine.
(apachectl passess
Agreed, and interested in other thoughts as well.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, June 28, 2004 11:23:57 AM
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the
On Monday, Patrick W. thus responded:
Indeed.. Where does that construct come from?
printf('N' = %d - FALSE[\NY\] = %d\n, 'N', FALSE[NY]);
I have never seend TRUE[NY], and would have guessed cpp would change
it to 1[NY] which doesn't mean anything to me. It appears to want to
be NY[1] ?! How
I have recently started to look how Authentication and Authorization
in done in Apache, and have looked over Justin Erenkrantz's slides
for Authentication in Apache HTTP Server 2.1 and have been in touch
with some of the mod_auth_kerb developers. My apologies if this
is already being addressed,
Hi,
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Sander
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The update to apr_strings.c after rc2 isn't correct AFAICT (apr_snprintf()
doesn't return negative). I don't see that it hurts, as the
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:27:06AM +0200:
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Builds and works very well on;
- Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9.0
- Fedora Core Linux 1, 2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, 3.0
- Slackware Linux 8.1,
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Good On FreeBSD 5.2.1
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
Any takers?
Regards,
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:17:01AM +0200:
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The trivial fix to make the above file
Chip Cuccio wrote:
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
I built RPMs with no issues for Fedora and RH 7.2 - 9.0.
Are you referring to the libpcre hack?
No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50,
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:36:33AM +0200:
No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50, which is
currently broken.
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
Take care
--
Chip Cuccio
Chip Cuccio wrote:
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
then tar up the archive and run
rpmbuild --rebuild
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:45:19AM +0200:
The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
then tar up the archive and run and an RPM should result.
Got it.
* Chip Cuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:43:11PM -0500:
Indeed it did. Applied diff, and am building on arbitrary RH 7.3 and 9.0
rpm buildhosts as I type this. Shall I send the resulting build-logs to the
list, or just you? I usually ask permission to send attachments to
31 matches
Mail list logo
