Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Nov 23 09:50:02 2004
New Revision: 106320
Modified:
httpd/mod_aspdotnet/trunk/Apache.Web/HostFactory.h
Log:
Clean up the only compile emit, and in the process create two
different warnings depending on which step fails.
Modified:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
Discussion of whether or not it's useful to have PHP tests in httpd-test
can take place on test-dev@, please send your comments there and I'll
follow up.
I actually think it's useful to have php tests in our suite, because
At 12:25 PM 11/23/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
Discussion of whether or not it's useful to have PHP tests in httpd-test
can take place on test-dev@, please send your comments there and I'll
follow up.
I actually think it's useful to have php tests in our
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:55:16PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
What I questioned was why we were doing the security validation
of PHP when it's outside the scope of httpd, or isn't due to some
interaction with httpd.
This is true for most of the functional tests of PHP in t/php/ which
Covalent
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:37:43 -0500, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone please take a look at bug
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:11:34 -0500, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ScriptSock directive must be used when there are two instances of
the server with same ServerRoot. If it is omitted, symptoms may
include
. wrong credentials for CGIs
. CGIs stop working for one
Brian Pane wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
A thread per-connection that is currently being processed.
Note that this is not the traditional 'event' model that people write
huge papers about and thttpd raves about, but rather a hybrid that
uses a Worker Thread todo the processing,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:18:11 -0500, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:11:34 -0500, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ScriptSock directive must be used when there are two instances of
the server with same ServerRoot. If it is
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Quoting William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, but why the next three lines? Why would Content-Encoding: gzip
*ever* be set on a 304?
Because Content-* header fields in a 304 response describe
what the response entity would contain if
So, uhh, ping? Any comments other than i'm iffy and is there any
reason not to add it?
+1 (concept; implementation not verified)
here too. is this the most recent patch:
http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746
?
if so, I'll try and review the implementation early
Geoffrey Young wrote:
So, uhh, ping? Any comments other than i'm iffy and is there any
reason not to add it?
+1 (concept; implementation not verified)
here too. is this the most recent patch:
http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746
?
if so, I'll try and review the
Ian Holsman wrote:
In a nutshell,
it is very hard to strip whitespace out of HTML, and have the resulting
file still be as valid as the old one. Browsers are very forgiving on
something and not on others. for example,
you should not strip code inside of javascript, or 'pre' tags.
The filter does
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:06:02PM +, Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing
these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning
of the 2.2.x series
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:40:29PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Quoting William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, but why the next three lines? Why would Content-Encoding: gzip
*ever* be set on a 304?
Because Content-* header fields in a 304 response describe
what the response
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 07:51:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:40:29PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Quoting William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, but why the next three lines? Why would Content-Encoding: gzip
*ever* be set on a 304?
Because
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Ronald Park wrote:
Now, for the bad news: we don't know if there's a specific single
request that creates the problem. In fact, given that it mostly runs
Blah, I was afraid of that. :-/
Now for the good news: we can probably run in production with debugging
enabled
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
http://www.apache.org/~jim/mod_dumpio.c
Yeah. :-)
But mod_dumpio calls apr_bucket_read() unconditionally on data buckets,
which is exactly what I *don't* want it to do. Because that modifies the
contents of the brigade. The module I'm looking for
At 05:39 PM 11/23/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
There are some files that have content that have nothing to do with their
name. And that annoys me to no end. Since we're now using a version control
system that supports renames (oh yay!), any support for refactoring some files?
My preliminary
One thing I was hoping is that, if bundled it, people can
add the kind of features they need. It was designed for a
simple and clear purpose, but there is more that it
can, and should, do :)
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:06 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
server/core.c: the core_input/output_filter-modules/filters/core.c *or*
server/core_filters.c
(server/core.c is 150k. Yikes!)\
Sounds like multiple
--On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:54 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One thing I was hoping is that, if bundled it, people can
add the kind of features they need. It was designed for a
simple and clear purpose, but there is more that it
can, and should, do :)
I think mod_dumpio
At 10:37 PM 11/23/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:06 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
server/request.c:
ap_directory_walk/ap_location_walk/ap_file_walk-server/walk.c
leave location_walk - it has NOTHING to do with files.
The directory/file
At 06:06 PM 11/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
ap_byterange_filter-modules/http/byterange_filter.c
urp. I'm not 100% certain we want the byterange filter in the
same context as the http protocol. Would be -so- nice to abstract
this so it was generic to potentially multiple protocols which
23 matches
Mail list logo
