On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:00:10AM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> According to what Bill said, I'm now waiting for votes on making it
> Alpha, Beta or GA.
>
> Thank you, and sorry for the mess. We should add a paragraph to the
> Release Guidelines about the release candidate stage, this point is
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 11:02 +0530,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But the requirement for my project itself is to be able to update the
> configuration (update SSL certificates/key of a virtual host) dynamically
> without apache restart.
Then you need to fix requirements for your project and not apach
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:15:58AM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> I don't think I get to vote, but I approve.
Anyone can vote.
Whether your vote gets counted is another story. =) -- justin
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:00:10AM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
According to what Bill said, I'm now waiting for votes on making it
Alpha, Beta or GA.
Thank you, and sorry for the mess. We should add a paragraph to the
Release Guidelines about the release candidate s
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Um, no. We don't have release candidates. You followed the documented
procedures correctly - you aren't the confused one. =) -- justin
Sorry, Justin. I just reviewed the Guidelines, and they are, simply, wrong.
"Email dev@httpd.apache.org, current-testers@httpd
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:15:58AM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I don't think I get to vote, but I approve.
Anyone can vote.
Whether your vote gets counted is another story. =) -- justin
Yes, but is that reworked remark about Fre
Hi,
Is Apache2.2 supported for Win2k?
If so where can I find the installable
for the same?
As I could not locate that in the Apache site.
The same is available for the release 2.0.55.
Thanks,
Mukesh
CAUTION - Disclaimer *
This e-mail co
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:10:42PM -, William Rowe wrote:
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c Tue Dec 20 09:10:38 2005
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@
> /* Loop through the requirements array until there's no elements
Hi,
I think it's clear that we have here a little problem with the release
guidelines. According to Justin, I followed them correctly in the
first place.
It seems that what we are used to and what we've done this far (making
a release candidate tarball, then vote for it to become a release as
Alp
* Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 08:29:00]:
> OK, Ajax is now running this drop. I will keep watch for cores
> although if other folks could keep an eye out that would be great as
> I'm kinda swamped.
Great. I was going to ask the infra team to turn on the MboxAntispam
and MboxHideE
On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
* Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 08:29:00]:
OK, Ajax is now running this drop. I will keep watch for cores
although if other folks could keep an eye out that would be great as
I'm kinda swamped.
Great. I was going to ask the
* Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 14:57:01]:
> I did no such thing. I could turn them on, but if the current state
> of the module makes you think they are already on, is that
> desirable?
My bad. They're just now On by default in mod_mbox :)
- Sam
--
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.
Prathama first wrote:
But my requirement is that I shouln't restart the apache web server
while
updating the certificates. As there are many other requests to other
virtual hosts are being processed.
Prathama then wrote:
But the requirement for my project itself is to be able to update
the co
Fenlason, Josh wrote:
With the new proxy_ajp module it doesn't seem possible to only pass
dynamic content to the servlet engine as was possible with mod_jk.
I discovered another method today: I had to install a tomcat connector today,
and found the following in the documentation
(http://tomc
During ApacheCon we had a discussion about how to apply 'AND/OR' logic
to the Authz providers. Those that were in attendance agreed that we
should eliminate the 'Satisfy all|any' directive in favor of something
that would handle not only host access control but authz access control
as well. It wa
Brad Nicholes wrote:
if ((user == "John) ||
((Group == "admin") && (ldap-group contains
auth'ed_user) &&
((ldap-attribute dept == "sales") || (file-group contains contains
auth'ed_user
then
auth_granted
else
auth_denied
I've seen some custom auth modules whose config looks
You guys are confusing each other to bits. We don't have release
candidates, we NEVER use m.n.v.rc1 versioning, and the thing that
Sam produced is called a tarball. We call it that because we don't
want people to believe it is a release until the PMC has voted to
release it. That's all there is
--On December 21, 2005 11:11:11 AM +0100 Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yes, but is that reworked remark about FreeBSD threads cool with you?
Close, but not quite. Threads are enabled in APR by default on 5.4-RELEASE
and higher (for APR 1.x branches which means httpd 2.2+). I don'
Hi,
Since no one has voted yet, I think I should start this (again)
properly and in the correct way of releasing something.
With all the noise I made, you should now know that mod_mbox is ready
to be released. The candidate tree as been tagged yesterday in
tags/0.2 and a tarball has been created,
On Dec 21, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Of course, since this tag is currently running like a charm on Ajax,
my vote is +1 for GA.
Like a charm, indeed. Zero cores since this morning CET.
+1 for GA.
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Proposal for discussion:
It was proposed that one way to handle host based as well as authz
access control was to first reimplement the directives 'Alllow', 'Deny'
and 'Order' as an authz provider (note: the authz-dev branch contains
the current effort to convert all auth
On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:54 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Of course, since this tag is currently running like a charm on Ajax,
my vote is +1 for GA.
Like a charm, indeed. Zero cores since this morning CET.
+1 for GA.
-1. Er, sorry, I was about
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 22:16, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> Of course, since this tag is currently running like a charm on Ajax,
> my vote is +1 for GA.
-1 to GA
Working nicely for us on Ajax is a long way from GA. Until it's been released
and we have a decent amount of third-party feedback
Hi,
* Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 15:42:33]:
> -1. Er, sorry, I was about to vote +1 and then noticed that the
> legal NOTICE file contains
[snip]
> Sorry, NOTICE is not a credits file. Add a README instead that lists
> all of the contributors. Likewise, the scripts direc
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Sorry, NOTICE is not a credits file. Add a README instead that lists
all of the contributors. Likewise, the scripts directory sucks beyond
description. If you aren't going to fix it, then remove it from the
release.
What specifically is wrong with the scripts director
* Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 16:45:09]:
> What specifically is wrong with the scripts directory?
Scripts are mostly specific to the ASF setup for
mail-archives.apache.org. They're not involved in making the module
work for the lambda user or even for anybody who's not part of the
On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Sorry, NOTICE is not a credits file. Add a README instead that lists
all of the contributors. Likewise, the scripts directory sucks
beyond
description. If you aren't going to fix it, then remove it from the
release.
W
On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
* Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-21 16:45:09]:
What specifically is wrong with the scripts directory?
Scripts are mostly specific to the ASF setup for
mail-archives.apache.org. They're not involved in making the module
work for t
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Sorry, NOTICE is not a credits file. Add a README instead that lists
all of the contributors. Likewise, the scripts directory sucks beyond
description. If you aren't going to fix it, then remove it
On Dec 21, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I agree with all points, except the last. They do work, they are
running mail-archives.apache.org.
No, an edited version of them is doing a poor job of occasionally
being manually used to update our mailing lists. I just ran into
that problem a
"Joost de Heer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Fenlason, Josh wrote:
>> With the new proxy_ajp module it doesn't seem possible to only pass
>> dynamic content to the servlet engine as was possible with mod_jk.
>
> I discovered another method today: I had to install
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-12-18 06:19:24 -0500 (Sun, 18 Dec 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is main
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-12-16 16:06:45 -0500 (Fri, 16 Dec 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained se
33 matches
Mail list logo
