Re: svn commit: r1642851 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ STATUS server/scoreboard.c

2014-12-02 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Hi, should the same logic be applied in: - ap_increment_counts (at line 367) ? (code looks like in ap_time_process_request where the <0 test is done) CJ Le 02/12/2014 13:42, j...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jim Date: Tue Dec 2 12:42:39 2014 New Revision: 1642851 URL: http://svn.apache

Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track

2014-12-02 Thread Jim Riggs
On 11/30/2014 11:08 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > * deploying Python web apps under uWSGI behind mod_proxy_fcgi/scgi > (some material > here: http://emptyhammock.com/projects/info/pyweb/index.html) On 1 Dec 2014, at 19:15, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Similarly, I'm always up for giving my proxy talk if

Re: svn commit: r1642154 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/expr.xml include/ap_expr.h server/util_expr_eval.c server/util_expr_parse.y

2014-12-02 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/27/2014 02:46 PM, jkal...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jkaluza > Date: Thu Nov 27 13:46:11 2014 > New Revision: 1642154 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1642154 > Log: > * ap_exr: Add replace(string, from, to) function. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/expr.xml > httpd/

RE: Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track

2014-12-02 Thread wrowe
- Original Message - Subject: Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track From: "Rich Bowen" Date: 12/2/14 8:29 am To: dev@httpd.apache.org On 12/01/2014 08:15 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > A side note on SSL/security: I had the idea a few years back that there > is probably enough conten

Re: svn commit: r1545408 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm: event/fdqueue.c eventopt/fdqueue.c

2014-12-02 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi, yes, it's been a while now, sorry for that... On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:10 PM, wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Mon Nov 25 21:10:05 2013 > New Revision: 1545408 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1545408 > Log: > naming suggestion re: trawick > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event

Re: svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

2014-12-02 Thread Rich Bowen
On 12/02/2014 09:56 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi, it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml. What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expec

Re: svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

2014-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my > working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for > docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml. > > What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expected? > I am probably guilty of not d

Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track

2014-12-02 Thread Rich Bowen
On 12/01/2014 08:15 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: A side note on SSL/security: I had the idea a few years back that there is probably enough content to do a "here is 5 minutes about how to configure SSL in httpd" and then 50 minutes of other important security topics (What Ciphers should I enable?

svn:mergeinfo from docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml

2014-12-02 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi, it seems that anytime I try to merge something from trunk into my working 2.4.x, it produces a mergeinfo for docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml. What's mergeinfo "policy" in httpd? Is that expected? Regards, Yann.

Re: Systemd support in 2.4

2014-12-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote: > >> On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available >>> in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 y

Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track

2014-12-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've updated the gdoc as "proxying and load balancing" > On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > On 11/30/2014 11:08 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> * deploying Python web apps under uWSGI behind mod_proxy_fcgi/scgi >> (some material >> here: http://emptyhammock.com/projects/info/pyweb/

Re: svn commit: r1639614 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2014-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Also, the old code notified unconditionally (too late, but always), > whereas now it will not should ap_start_lingering_close() fail in > start_lingering_close_blocking(). > > Shouldn't we : > > Index: server/mpm/event/event.c >

Re: ApacheCon Austin, httpd track

2014-12-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
The idea is that being a project with a long, long history, httpd has the unfortunate reputation of being old, slow, and basically, not the new hotness. So even though the project has been around, 2.4 is vastly different, and really should be seen and considered as a whole new web server. > On Nov

Re: svn commit: r1639614 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2014-12-02 Thread Eric Covener
> Index: server/mpm/event/event.c > === > --- server/mpm/event/event.c(revision 1642684) > +++ server/mpm/event/event.c(working copy) > @@ -859,16 +859,16 @@ static int start_lingering_close_common(event_conn > cs->pub

Re: [RFC] CGIPassHeader Authorization|Proxy-Authorization|...

2014-12-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Eric Covener > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jeff Trawick > wrote: > >> > CGIPassHeader could be allowed in htaccess if the http

Re: svn commit: r1639614 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2014-12-02 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, wrote: > Author: covener > Date: Fri Nov 14 12:04:46 2014 > New Revision: 1639614 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639614 > Log: > don't call notify_suspend() in a worker thread after > start_lingering_close_common may have put the socket back > into the pollset.

Re: svn commit: r1639614 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c

2014-12-02 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, wrote: > Author: covener > Date: Fri Nov 14 12:04:46 2014 > New Revision: 1639614 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639614 > Log: > don't call notify_suspend() in a worker thread after > start_lingering_close_common may have put the socket back > into the pollset.