Re: Can't find definition of ap_run_child_stopping

On 2023-08-23 07:02, Emile Cormier wrote: Hi Everyone, I'm studying parts of httpd to help me in the development of a TCP server I'm working on. In particular, I'm looking at how httpd handles socket errors. Anyway, I've stumbled upon an ap_run_child_stopping function call within the

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-11 13:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from Subversion to Git. This means that our latest read/write repository will be no

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-08 16:18, Christopher Schultz wrote: Graham, On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote: On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from Subversion to Git. This means that our latest read/write

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-04 07:48, Eric Covener wrote: [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the features of Github (for now Actions and PR). [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the features of Github (for now Actions and PR).

Re: ci vs PR approvals? (was: [apache/httpd] Fix a possible NULL pointer dereference in hook_uri2file (PR #355))

On 2023-05-03 14:12, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev wrote: On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote: 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We have some closer ties to Subversion by some overlaps in

Re: [httpd-site] branch main updated: publishing release httpd-2.4.55

in charge of the cve process about the proper schema here, as ours may be a bit ... off. TBD On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:17 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: I have patched the system to deal with the inconsistencies, but those should really be looked at. There seems to be a mix of "timeline&quo

Re: [httpd-site] branch main updated: publishing release httpd-2.4.55

I have patched the system to deal with the inconsistencies, but those should really be looked at. There seems to be a mix of "timeline" entries that are not consistent throughout the dir (even when accounting for v4.0 vs v5.0 CVE data), and those were throwing spanners into the build process.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as httpd-2.4.53

On 11/03/2022 13.14, Stefan Eissing wrote: While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive. 72 hours is a guideline, not a hard rule. If you wanna do it in 48 or 24, that's fine as long as there's a valid reason. Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote

Re: opinion poll, stale issues

here is what we advise you as possible > follow ups: ..." > > If indeed an auto-wontfix seems to harsh for you, how about: > > - add STALE as bug status > - set reports to STALE after n months of inactivity. > - anyone can close STALE issues where we wait for a reply > from the bug submitter. > > Kind Regards, > Stefan > > > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat

Re: Remove link to "complete list of mirrors" from download page

I've culled what is no longer relevant here. With regards, Daniel. On 22/01/2022 19.37, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: Hi, Due to ASF's migration to the new Download Content Delivery System, the "complete list of mirrors" ([1]) no longer exists om www.apache.org. Can someone with com

Remove link to "complete list of mirrors" from download page

ork around this but didn't manage (see for example [3]). I'm not sure if Infra consider it to be a bug that dlcdn is in both lists [4]. Kind regards, Daniel Sahlberg (Hangaround in the Subversion project). [1] https://www.apache.org/mirrors/ [2] https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi

Re: mod_tls as experimental module?

el. Historically, the concept of > "subproject" has been ... suboptimal, to put it nicely. > > The changes to the core can/should be made regardless of adoption of this > module. > > Cheers, > -g > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat

Re: Download page appears to be broken

On 31/10/2021 19.11, Craig Russell wrote: Hi, I'm looking at the download page https://httpd.apache.org/download It's https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi - the other page is the template. I tried the link httpd-2.4.51.tar.bz2

Re: 2.4.49 release report

le on how to > get this out in the future. > > This should serve as a record for things to improve in the next > release - while memory of this one is still fresh. Please add to > this anything I might have missed or additional things you like > us to tackle in the next release. > > Thanks, > Stefan > > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat

Re: sending announcement mail

it's on announce@httpd.a.o already. I modded it through. You need to send it to annou...@apache.org as well. On 16/09/2021 06.03, ste...@eissing.org wrote: Am 16.09.2021 um 12:40 schrieb Greg Stein : Fails, how? ... email to annou...@apache.org needs to come from your @apache.org account

Re: release roll soon?

Indeed it kind of sounds too early to go with OpenSSL 3 yet to consider for a stable release of apache. (Too fresh out of the oven?) El vie., 10 sept. 2021 9:42, ste...@eissing.org escribió: > > > > Am 10.09.2021 um 09:02 schrieb Joe Orton : > > > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 03:23:13PM -0700,

Re: release?

te update (now on github) and CVE > announcement (if any) now that part of the process is handled elsewhere). > +1 To my knowledge, the publishing of the site and overhaul of the new CVE process are the things requiring updates. -- Daniel Ruggeri > The CVE announcement should be much

Re: disallow HTTP 0.9 by default?

I know for a fact that this will bring me some headaches at work with a few F5 "ping" checks, but still, to heck with it! +1 El jue, 22 jul 2021 a las 12:39, Daniel Gruno () escribió: > > On 22/07/2021 10.02, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > > > On 7/21/21 10

Re: disallow HTTP 0.9 by default?

On 22/07/2021 10.02, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 7/21/21 10:04 PM, Eric Covener wrote: I was chasing an unrelated thread about close_notify alerts and reminded me -- is it time to change the default for HttpProtocolOptions from Allow0.9 to Require1.0? As the manual says, the requirement was

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 16/07/2021 22.45, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Hi, when a PULL request is generated, it is forwarded to @dev. Same when it is accepted. This is just fine for me. However, when one directly modify within apache/httpd-site on GitHub, apparently, no notification is sent. I think that is would

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 07/07/2021 14.14, Eric Covener wrote: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65439 whoops, looks like the manual links from for the following are not working: https://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ https://httpd.apache.org/mod_cgid/ Daniel, do you recall how this worked before? Maybe we

Re: Security features of Github

On 25/06/2021 09.23, Ruediger Pluem wrote: I would like to leverage the "security features" of GitHub like Dependabot alerts and Code scanning alerts. First question: Do we want this? Does anyone object? Second question: Is this possible with our GitHub setup? I known that this question

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 18/06/2021 14.33, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:20 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 18/06/2021 14.16, Eric Covener wrote: I reviewed Christophes old post, I think we should proceed with the ASF template and migration process. Worst case Christophe can still apply what he has

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 18/06/2021 14.16, Eric Covener wrote: I reviewed Christophes old post, I think we should proceed with the ASF template and migration process. Worst case Christophe can still apply what he has learned to further refine the output of the migration. I'll create an infra ticket to ask for the

Re: Contribution to Apache HTTPD

Hello. I'm a senior C developer working for CloudLinux. I would like > to participate in the HTTPD project. Are there any unassigned tasks > which I can take? And how to proceed with it? Thanks in advance. -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat

Re: Build warnings in 2.4.48

support a version whose latest release was 5 years ago? I recall when running configure seeing a message that looks for OpenSSL>0.9.8 though, but still... El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:57, Rainer Jung escribió: > Am 20.05.2021 um 14:07 schrieb Noel Butler: > > On 20/05/2021 21:19, Rainer Jung

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.48

-2.4.48.tar.gz > > The SVN tag is '2.4.48' at r1889975. > > -- > Christophe JAILLET -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Freenode

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.47

3c78b70a34 > *httpd-2.4.47.tar.gz > sha512: > de4c80e1ddebe3286c234179fd01d4917f479f75a7fe958032c19a8f22546e95f31e3b50073844d09f20f54894e7d511bcd9fd2f1cd2b2c71b3a182d6e62bab3 > *httpd-2.4.47.tar.gz > > The SVN tag is '2.4.47' at r1889091. > > -- > Christophe JAILLET -- Daniel

Re: libcurl dependency version fix for mod_md

On 15/10/2020 15.50, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 15.10.2020 um 15:28 schrieb Alexander Gerasimov : Dear httpd devs, Please apply a small patch that fixes a minimal curl version (so mod_md can be built on CentOS 7). I made a pull request https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/108/ and filed a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.46

I'm happy to encode whatever we consider the best way forward into that script. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 8/7/2020 8:56 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Following the announcement link, it isn't clear that  > > https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html  > > fixes iss

Re: svn commit: r40863 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

it's just because the text was bumped as-is from the 'dev' location to the 'dist' location. -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 5, 2020 7:23:33 AM CDT, Rainer Jung wrote: >Could you fix the date (September 21, 2018 sems wrong). > >Thanks! > >Rainer > >Am 05.08.2020 um 13:32 schrie

Re: Your project's website

). While I'll be happy to assist with that, I don't want to put on too many hats here, so if someone would volunteer to be the liaison, that would be wonderful. With regards, Daniel. [1] https://infra.apache.org/project-site.html <https://infra.apache.org/project-site.html> [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.46

to wrap up the week! Here are the votes I recorded during the thread: PMC jailletc36, steffenal, elukey, jorton, jfclere, ylavic, covener, gbechis, gsmith, druggeri, jblond, rjung Community Noel Butler, wrowe -- Daniel Ruggeri On 8/1/2020 9:13 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Thir

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.46

   apr-util: "1.6.1"     iconv: "1.2.2"     brotli: "1.0.7"     nghttp2: "1.41.0"     zlib: "1.2.11"     pcre: "8.44"     libxml2: "2.9.9"     php: "7.4.8"     lua: "5.3.5"     curl: "7.71.1" --

Re: svn commit: r1880502 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES

Sure - I'll commit the following:   *) mod_proxy_fcgi: Fix missing APLOGNO macro argument Straight forward enough. Thanks for the correction. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 8/1/2020 9:14 AM, Steffen wrote: > Not agree. Fixes APLOGNO it for all platforms. Only I reported warnings on > Windows.

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.46

: 5801c1dd0365f706a5e2365e58599b5adac674f3c66b0f39249909841e6cdf16bfdfe001fbd668f323bf7b6d14b116b5e7af49867d456336fad5e685ba020b15 *httpd-2.4.46.tar.gz The SVN tag is '2.4.46' at r1880505. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Pending fixes or reroll? Was: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.45

Agreed - thank you (everyone) for the quick rally to fix this and for confirming we don't have other work needing to be done. I apologize for taking almost 24 hours to ACK and get us moving again. I've updated CHANGES and will send a VOTE shortly -- Daniel Ruggeri On 7/31/2020 1:28 PM, Rainer

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.45

2.4.46 when we are all buttoned up with the warnings. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 7/29/2020 10:26 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over th

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.45

nd Steffen points out there is precedence. > Aye - and I'd hate to appear inconsistent :-) Version numbers are cheap - I'll re-roll when we have confirmation all is good in the 2.4 branch. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.45

: "1.1.1g"     openldap: "2.4.50"     apr: "1.7.0"     apr-util: "1.6.1"     iconv: "1.2.2"     brotli: "1.0.7"     nghttp2: "1.41.0"     zlib: "1.2.11"     pcre: "8.44"     libxml2: "2.9.9"     php: &q

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.45

: 8b1e9c22371c75efd2466c69ed48782ddcecfe0a3ff143ca3f9cb720ea2aee56f5c323a9e3ae80cd5c44f1601b5894879af03b6b3729a8ca0555bb5193a1296a *httpd-2.4.45.tar.gz The SVN tag is '2.4.45' at r1880411. -- Daniel Ruggeri

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.44

On 7/28/2020 12:51 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.44

Hi, Stefan;    Since version numbers are cheap and we've had only one vote on this one, I don't see harm in incorporating the change and rerolling. Doubly so since votes are already in for the change and all that. I'll re-roll the release tarball once you confirm. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 7/29/2020

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.44

: x86_64   libraries:     openssl: "1.1.1g"     openldap: "2.4.50"     apr: "1.7.0"     apr-util: "1.6.1"     iconv: "1.2.2"     brotli: "1.0.7"     nghttp2: "1.41.0"     zlib: "1.2.11"     pcre: "8.44"     libxml2:

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.44

: f9065b30df4d91b70739631e19e65c5a68d4f4ed9071c2b040176b5ee839a86078f178cadd8430f325edda8dddf1ff95c7924e62d73f8f3b6e9b7f48f0b3b257 *httpd-2.4.44.tar.gz The SVN tag is '2.4.44' at r1880378. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T late this week

On 7/28/2020 7:41 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:30 AM Christophe JAILLET > wrote: >> Le 27/07/2020 à 14:11, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : >>> >>> On July 27, 2020 2:12:45 AM CDT, Stefan Eissing >>> wrote: >>>>

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T late this week

On July 27, 2020 2:12:45 AM CDT, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 25.07.2020 um 00:14 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : >> >> Hi, all; >> FYI, I came across an unexpected set of diffs when rebuilding docs >before tagging this morning. Haven't forgotten about

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T late this week

23:32:05, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >It's been a while since we've rolled a release and gotten fixes/etc in our > community's hands. Apologies for not suggesting this sooner. How about a T > Friday? That will let vote run through the weekend. > -- > Daniel Ruggeri

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T late this week

e need three committer +1s to backport. Once all three are in place, the proposer (or release manager) commits the change to the branch. So, for this one, I think we're not quite ready to incorporate. P.S. I hope all is well - long time no chat! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 7/23/2020 1:33 PM, Christopher S

NOTICE: Intent to T late this week

Hi, all; It's been a while since we've rolled a release and gotten fixes/etc in our community's hands. Apologies for not suggesting this sooner. How about a T Friday? That will let vote run through the weekend. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: RFC: Documenting changes in the CHANGES file

template or at least some sort of header / footer that is static. >> 5. This script can be called either manually and we commit the resulting >> CHANGES file as we like just like the x-forms commits >>for documentation plus this script is called by the release scripts from

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.52, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 29/04/2020 10.22, Daniel Gruno wrote: I recommend using selfserve.apache.org <http://selfserve.apache.org> to create notifications@httpd (the typical name/pattern for this stuff), then to use .asf.yaml to sort out the various emails. O

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.22, Daniel Gruno wrote: I recommend using selfserve.apache.org <http://selfserve.apache.org> to create notifications@httpd (the typical name/pattern for this stuff), then to use .asf.yaml to sort out the various emails. Once we are in agreement on a name here, I c

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.11, Greg Stein wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:19 AM Joe Orton > wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:19:09PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > +1 g...@httpd.apache.org (I declare the naming discussion for the

Odd vulnerabilities_24.html output

happens, I can look into it further.    If it's too complicated a fix, I'm OK with removing that line from the description. The CVE reports must include the version vulnerability info in the description, but it's not really a requirement for the site (I was just keeping them consistent). -- Daniel Ruggeri

[RESULT - PASS][VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

On 3/26/2020 9:50 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.43: >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

nks, Bill. Shall this response be considered a +1 for the purposes of the release vote? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

On 3/26/2020 9:50 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.43: >

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.43

: d9879b8f8ef7d94dee1024e9c25b56d963a3b072520878a88a044629ad577c109a5456791b39016bf4f6672c04bf4a0e5cfd32381211e9acdc81d4a50b359e5e *httpd-2.4.43.tar.gz The SVN tag is '2.4.43' at r1875715. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.42

Hi, all;    Per the issues surfaced/fixed, I'll go ahead and declare this release as dead-on-the vine. I'll target another T later this week, hopefully after the discussion around OpenSSL versioning plays out.    How about Thursday? -- Daniel Ruggeri On 3/19/2020 9:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.42

: 09d0f3bd9266907eea91ac9129a3c41658929b9fd88d627c1fccceaf952548d2c3ad62099b9bcd1ae4822402c1dbda90b8bfb9f64cd5eac9f84ed249faffb837 *httpd-2.4.42.tar.gz The SVN tag is '2.4.42' at r1875427. -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] Intenet to T 2.4.42 in the next 36 hours.

Hi, all; It looks like we're in a good place to do a release so I will aim to T 2.4.42 tomorrow. Please feel free to shout loudly if any issues are found. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.4.42 soon?

Sure - happy to oblige! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2020-03-13 07:51, Eric Covener wrote: Looks like STATUS is in good shape. Any cycles Daniel or Jim? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: svn commit: r1866035 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On February 7, 2020 4:59:39 AM CST, Joe Orton wrote: >On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:52:18AM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hey there, Joe; No idea how I didn't detect this much sooner. I have >>access to hardware security modules with PKCS11 interfaces for key > >>

2.4.next coming?

Hi, all. It's been a few months since we've rolled a release and there are a few bug fixes that seem like A Good Thing to get out there. Thoughts on rolling soon-ish? As always, I volunteer to either RM or mentor someone new through the RM process. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: svn commit: r1866035 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

ton, > + > PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED >[ New entries should be added at the START of the list ] > > > > -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

On 8/9/2019 8:50 AM, sebb wrote: > On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:40, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next f

Re: svn commit: r1865191 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/announce.sh

s*$//g; >> +die "Status update not found!" if !$ENV{STATUS_UPDATE}; >> +open(CHANGES, "$ENV{UPDATE_FILE}"); my @content=; >> close(CHANGES); >> +foreach my $line (@content) { >> + print "$line"; >> +

Countdown to 25 years - has httpd changed your life?

keep it concise, as we wouldn't want to force the board to go through 150 pages :) With very warm regards, Daniel.

Ignore the GitHub email...

That was me trying to get travis notifications working...

Re: Travis CI failures

On 08/12/2019 20.12, Luca Toscano wrote: Il giorno dom 1 dic 2019 alle ore 12:05 Luca Toscano ha scritto: Travis seems not able to deliver emails to dev@, I opened a jira to Infra: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19508 It was suggested to ask a moderator of httpd-dev@ to approve

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite

Re: Migrate to git?

On 14/10/2019 09.51, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: At the moment I think we have a quality control problem for 2.4.x, yet I find it hard to justify spending much time on writing test cases because that stuff is run so rarely. How many tests

Re: Migrate to git?

even with only five committers. But it can be done. Did I get it correct from Daniel, that this issue is already solved? But looking at one of my recent Subversion commits (r1866078 / cb8c40c581d17382cba338b3d90c67b914648984) that happened after I joined the Apache Org on Github does not show my

Re: Migrate to git?

On 06/10/2019 17.59, Nick Kew wrote: On 6 Oct 2019, at 04:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 05/10/2019 19.30, Nick Kew wrote: If it moves to github, how and at what level is history preserved? Github can do alarming things with history even for a project that's always been there! We would have

Re: Migrate to git?

On 05/10/2019 19.30, Nick Kew wrote: On 5 Oct 2019, at 21:09, Jim Jagielski wrote: Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase in contributions and contributors... Is this something the httpd project should consider? Especially w/ the foundation

Re: Migrate to git?

consider? Especially w/ the >> foundation officially supporting Github, it seems like time to have a >> discussion about it, especially as we start thinking about the next 25 years >> of this project :) >> >> Cheers! -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Freenode

Re: Migrate to git?

On 05/10/2019 15.09, Jim Jagielski wrote: Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase in contributions and contributors... Is this something the httpd project should consider? Especially w/ the foundation officially supporting Github, it seems like time to

Re: Integration tests running on Docker

scope for our > > project? In the former case I could spend some time on figuring out > > how to create what I proposed above, otherwise I'll stop and drop the > > idea :) > > > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Freenode

Re: CVE-2019-10097 vs. CHANGEs entry

Ah, yes... Not sure how I made that error. Just fixed! -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 17, 2019 9:41:42 AM CDT, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >Hi, > >Shouldn't CVE-2019-10097 be listed under 2.4.41, too? > >Cheers, >Stefan > >--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES 2019/08/14 20:43:0

[RESULT][VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

and will prep for announcement in 48-ish hours. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

+1 From me as well. A few snags with lua, but that's very platform specific and doesn't affect the vote. I should probably look into better compat with 5.3 later :) On 8/9/19 11:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2019/08/09 13:40:38, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

On 2019/08/09 13:40:38, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: b713e835aa7cde823a4b7f8e3463164f3d9fe63e *httpd-2.4.41.tar.gz sha256: 3c0f9663240beb0f008acf3b4501c4f339d7467ee345a36c86c46b4d6f3a5461 *httpd-2.4.41.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs

Yessir. I'll send a notification when ready. -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 8, 2019 11:54:18 AM CDT, Dennis Clarke wrote: >On 8/8/19 7:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now >> that we're good to go.

Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

+1 -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 8, 2019 8:09:57 AM CDT, Eric Covener wrote: >CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert. > >On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM wrote: >> >> Author: covener >> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019 >> New Revision: 1864701 >> &

[NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.41 in ~24 hrs

Hi, all; As the subject says, I'd like to get on with our 2.4.new release now that we're good to go. Will kick things off in about 24 hours -- Daniel Ruggeri

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

again soon! -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 3, 2019 8:51:07 AM CDT, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >Hi, all; >   Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

Thanks, Jan; I'm afraid I have no way to verify or dig into Windows-specific issues. Can you share more information or errors that can help, or is this related to the things already discussed on the list? -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 4, 2019 6:33:58 AM CDT, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >Gregg Sm

Re: svn commit: r1856807 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/security/CVE-2019-0215.t

internal client error to be treated as a "pass" of a test it cannot run. -- Daniel Ruggeri > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Am 02.04.2019 um 12:44 schrieb jor...@apache.org: >> Author: jorton >> Date: Tue Apr  2 10:44:12 2019 >> New Revision: 185680

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40

: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: 31bc6f87ac209010b8b364abc1c80dfaee53cc64 *httpd-2.4.40.tar.gz sha256: 451e6cf6caa09119900b74652266427f70050de5c51948acd4aaaf60d0d3cad0 *httpd-2.4.40.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Vote thread for 2.4.40 not started yet?

Ahhh! I did send a VOTE email, but it looks like it never made it through to the list! I will retry from my ASF address through the ASF mail relay... Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:18:57 -0500 From: Daniel Ruggeri To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.40 Message-ID: X-Sender

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T Friday

Hrm... I see this never made it to the list! Retrying from my apache.org address... -- Daniel Ruggeri Director, VP Fundraising, member, httpd PMC The Apache Software Foundation On July 31, 2019 8:18:41 AM CDT, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >Hi, all >I see we have a number of backports ready

Re: libcrurl

It seems there may have been certain misunderstanding. Daniel Stenberg published this tweet linking to googler apologizing for the mess in his twitter account: https://twitter.com/bagder/status/1141653215685087232 And the link of the apology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20228237 El mié

[COMPLETED] Migrating our wiki

Our wiki was successfully transferred to the confluence service, and is available at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HTTPD All httpd committers should have write access to it, and I'll look into how we lock down the old wiki. With regards, Daniel. On 21/05/2019 13.13, Dennis

Re: Migrating our wiki

On 21/05/2019 12.51, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 5/21/19 12:32 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start migration tomorrow, and within a day or two, we

Migrating our wiki

Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start migration tomorrow, and within a day or two, we should have it all moved to confluence, with LDAP permissions for us.

DRuggeri has a new PGP key

2019-05-11 Key fingerprint = E348 0043 5956 21FE 5610 5F11 2AB1 2A7A DC55 C003 uid Daniel Ruggeri (http://home.apache.org/~druggeri/) uid Daniel Ruggeri uid [jpeg image of size 13027] sub 4096R/14FF4720 2019-05-11 It would

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >