Pardon me for butting in here, but as someone who is building a product
based in part upon Apache/mod_proxy, I *strongly* agree with Graham. I've
had to hack the mod_proxy code more than once to deal with this issue, and
I'd rather not have to. I agree that it should be entirely up to any
modi
ideas? Is this a tested configuration in this beta (I don't see much
about it in the status reports)? What else can I try to provide more data?
- Dave
--
Dave Seidel, Founder
Mindreef, LLC
service
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dave Seidel wrote:
> I just built a 2.0.18 binary from scratch from the zip archive, using VC6
on
> Win2K. Works fine from the console, but it does not work as a service.
> Any ideas? Is this a tested configuration in this beta (I don't see much
> about
roblem running 2.0.18 as Win2k service
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dave Seidel wrote:
>
> > I just built a 2.0.18 binary from scratch from the zip archive, using
VC6
> on
> > Win2K. Works fine from the console, but it does not work as a service.
> > Any ideas? Is t
ase.
> Sorry
> > for the confusion.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:40 AM
> > To: Apache-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.18 as Win2k servic
-n Apache arg instead,
if you like.
Bill
- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
&
Well, since this is a developer machine, everyone (actually, "Everyone"
group) has full permissions from the root of this drive down. And I would
have thought that adding my user to the Admin group would also give it
privileges.
In any case, I went full out and added the user to both the Admin *
This is precisely the same as what I'm seeing, the only difference being
that I built from the 2.0.28 archive.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k serv
nary.
FYI, I did my local build using VC 6.0, using the InstallBin target in the
IDE, using all the project files as they came from the zip archive.
-Original Message-----
From: Dave Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pr
No SSL in either.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
Did you build with SSL support? Does the MSI file contain SSL support?
einstalled VS6SP5, rebuilt from scratch again. Same problem.
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
F
Any other thoughts on this one? It's going to become important very soon
that I be able to run my own build as a service.
Thanks.
- Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:29 PM
To: William A. Rowe, Jr.; [
Just a reminder, that I and at least one other person (Dwayne Miller
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]) have reported that we have been unable to get Apache
to run as an NT service when we do our own builds. Should I add this to a
bug database somewhere?
- Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rodent of Unus
13 matches
Mail list logo
