On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
> I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
>
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED])
>
> A concern with the lo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:36:55PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Tue Nov 28 09:36:45 2006
> New Revision: 480135
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=480135
> Log:
> Apply patch for PR 41056 (19954) to fix chunk
> filter. Now flushes work better.
This looks wrong
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 02:15:06PM +0100, François wrote:
> On Debian Sarge 3.1 rev2, httpd compiled with external libpcre 4.x and some
> RewriteRules segfault occurs every time we start the daemon.
2.0.x doesn't support use of external PCRE, this should be reported to
Debian directly since it's
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:41:07AM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> Offhand, doesn't ctx pool span the connection?
...
> > @@ -1469,8 +1468,7 @@
> > * containing a setaside pool and a brigade which constrain the
> > * lifetime of the buffered data. */
> > ctx = apr_palloc(r->pool, siz
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:45:08AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 10/16/06, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Patch below logs the path to the config file just before ap_mpm_run()
> >
> >Can help clear up some mysteries when posthumously analyzing an ErrorLog
>
> as a further aid, is it
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
> >
> > Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
> > > start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
> >
> > I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
> > is_so
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:17:18PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Tue, October 31, 2006 2:31 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > To determine writability of the output filter chain is not as simple as
> > exposing writability of the socket. An output filter may block on
> &
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:59:49AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:56:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On 10/30/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >What does that [#1] break?
> > >
> > >Seems an easy/low-level solutio
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:11:47PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Tue, October 31, 2006 2:02 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > Being able to determine writability from the output filter chain means
> > redesigning the output filtering interface, there is nothing simple
> > ab
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:49:10PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Tue, October 31, 2006 12:59 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > I very much sympathise with this argument. But it does mean that the
> > storage provider cannot break any of the assumptions mentioned in the
> > o
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:56:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What does that [#1] break?
> >
> >Seems an easy/low-level solution. Does the provider return a
> >status value to say "I have/haven't passed this stuff down the
> >chain"? It h
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:13:09PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>> 2) keep the interface as-is, but read buckets in mod_cache and partition
> >>> the brigade manually; only pass a "small" brigade with known-length
> >>> buckets to the provider. (so no morphing and no arbitrary memory
> >>> consu
The existing 2.x store_body interface passed a brigade to the storage
provider's store_body() callback. It is impossible for the provider to
store all of such a brigade without consuming an arbitrary amount of
RAM, since the brigade may contain morphing buckets (a CGI/PIPE bucket
is the pathol
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:26:18AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >1) cannot write entire response to disk for any content type before
> >sending anything to the client; filter acts by writing to cache and
> >c
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:51:30AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >It would make
> >custom 3rd party modules easier to write too; we could define, say 1
> >as PROVIDER_ID_CUSTOM, making it easier to write add-ons to modules
> >which use the provider interface to just write new providers with
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:18:30PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Mon, October 30, 2006 12:07 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
> > 1) cannot write entire response to disk for any content type before
> > sending anything to the client; filter acts by writing to cache and
> > client sync
Thanks Roy. So, the goals for mod_disk_cache as I see it:
A simple general-purpose disk cache which makes no assumptions about
speed of backend, speed of storage or speed of clients; is
single-threaded and does not involve any multi-process synchronisation
beyond open/O_EXCL. Specifically:
1
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:38:02AM -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> > +/* Is our network connection still alive?
> > + * If not, we must continue caching the file, so keep
> > looping.
> > + * We will return the error at the end when caching is
> > done.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:20:10PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> > Index: modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c
> > ===
> > --- modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c (revision 450104)
> > +++ modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c (working copy)
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:02:40AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Thu, October 26, 2006 10:50 am, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure how that is relevant. The core output filter writes to the
> > socket directly - it can use non-blocking writes or whatever it likes to
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:21:26PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >There is no other acceptable solution AFAICS. Buffering the entire
> >brigade (either to disk, or into RAM as the current code does) before
> >writing to the client is not OK, p
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:54:04PM -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > Another couple of hundred lines of code and even a new config directive,
> > and this still doesn't get close to actually fixing the problem! -1
> > already, this code is just not getti
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:44:48PM -, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Wed Oct 25 06:44:47 2006
> New Revision: 467655
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=467655
> Log:
> mod_cache: Fix an out of memory condition that occurs when the
> cache tries to save huge fil
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:17:22AM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> > > I believe that the parent process, which is supposed to have a 7
> > > second space between its own SIGTERM and SIGKILL, is getting the
> > > SIGKILL before it has slept for 3 seconds *and* sent the final
> > > SIGKILL
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:38:07AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Currently, mod_cgi{d} sets APR_KILL_AFTER_TIMEOUT. It appears however,
> on a server under high load (>100 load average), it is possible for only
> the initial SIGTERM to be sent. It appears that the SIGKILL was never
> sent to the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:47:09PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Tue, October 24, 2006 2:22 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Neither is it appropriate to have any process do the "sleep and stat"
> > loop waiting for some other process to finish writing a cache file.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:11:58PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Brian Akins wrote:
>
> >Can someone please summarize the various patches for mod_disk_cache that
> >have been floating around in last couple weeks? I have looked at the
> >patches but wasn't real sure of the general philosophy/me
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:45:45PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/ajp.h
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/ajp.h?view=diff&rev=467014&r1=467013&r2=467014
> > ==
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:01:51PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> In any case, I prefer the style of C code that more directly reflects
> the underlying assembly, even if an optimizing compiler would produce
> the same assembler for both. It is just natural to read "use the result
> of this save
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:15:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c Thu Sep 28 13:15:42 2006
> @@ -837,6 +837,11 @@
> APR_BLOCK_READ, HUGE_STRING_LEN);
>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:41:11PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Wed, September 27, 2006 2:31 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > The new approach is exactly the same for other bucket types, FILE should
> > not be treated as special just to avoid that. Other bucket types will
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Wed, September 27, 2006 11:37 am, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > I don't get it - as discussed, this approach is completely unsound.
> > There is no reason to assume it's possible to copy the entire conte
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:26:57PM -, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Sep 26 09:26:56 2006
> New Revision: 450105
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450105
> Log:
> mod_disk_cache: Make caching of large files possible on 32bit machines
> by determining wheth
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:20:35PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> >On Tue, September 26, 2006 1:00 pm, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> >>This was discussed a while back. I think this is an API problem which
> >>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:52:18AM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
>
> This patch depends on "mod_disk_cache LFS-aware config" submitted
> earlier and is for trunk.
>
> It makes caching of large files possible on 32bit machines by:
>
> * Realising that a file is a file and can be copied as such
Hi Davi,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:34:03PM -0300, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> Clean up code style in the cache code and shrink the mod_mem_cache
> store_body function.
The casts to/from void * are unnecessary and could just be removed
rather than being whitespace-adjusted.
> --- modules/cache/mod_mem
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:18:02AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> ... so that ServerTokens doesn't affect what gets logged to the error
> log at startup (or any other place where we want the description of
> the server instead of the banner to be written over the network).
>
> This patch axes ap_get
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:12:02AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:57:09PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > Author: jim
> > > Date: Mon Aug 28 11:57:09 2006
> > > New Revision: 437781
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:57:09PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Aug 28 11:57:09 2006
> New Revision: 437781
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437781&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge r437768 from trunk:
>
> Minor nit: why make the logic more complex than it needs to
> be ?
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:27:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Tue Aug 8 16:27:25 2006
> New Revision: 429879
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=429879&view=rev
> Log:
> PR#38448: don't URLencode tilde in path component
There is a standard for changelog entries w
+1 for release for the 2.0.59 and 2.2.3 tarballs - thanks for RMing!
testall passes for both on:
PASS: RHEL3/i686 RHEL4/i686 FC4/i686 FC5/i686 RHEL4/x86_64 FC5/x86_64
joe
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:36:00AM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
...
> The real solution of course, is to upgrade to the current release of
> PCRE, version 6.7. However, we should probably not do that on the
> stable branches.
Agreed. Given that the pcre already shipped and in the tree is patche
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:50:07PM -, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Jul 25 09:50:07 2006
> New Revision: 425454
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425454&view=rev
> Log:
> Added cping/cpong support for the AJP protocol.
This is missing a prototype in ajp.h:
mod_proxy_
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 07/23/2006 09:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >> While we are at it. There is another related report (39243,
> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243). Some
> >> people feel unh
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:54:33PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > On 07/23/2006 02:10 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> >> Joe Orton wrote:
> >>> - use APR apr_file_* not ANSI C fopen,
> >>
> >> I need a FILE *.
> >
> > Ma
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 02:27:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: ben
> Date: Sat Jul 22 07:27:43 2006
> New Revision: 424584
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424584&view=rev
> Log:
> Add PKCS#7 support.
-1. We've had an RTC policy on the stable branch for many years: please
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:01:08AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Thu Jul 20 04:01:07 2006
> New Revision: 423886
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=423886&view=rev
> Log:
> * Check for symbolic links of the target file in the optimized case that we
> had already
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:22:32AM +0200, André Malo wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/support/Makefile.in
>
> > +ifneq (win32,${OS})
> > + PROGRAMS += checkgid fcgistarter
> > +endif
> > +
>
> I'm not a Makefile guru, but that doesn't look really portable (o
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:35:53PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 14:16, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > This introduced compiler warnings:
> >
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > mod_proxy.c: In function `proxy_interpolate':
> > m
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:00:26PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Thu Jul 13 12:00:26 2006
> New Revision: 421686
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421686&view=rev
> Log:
> Support environment variable interpolation in reverse proxy configuration
This introduced com
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:59:25PM -0700, Paul Adamczyk wrote:
> While testing HTTP messages on popular Web sites, I've
> observed that the same message sent to the same
> version of the Apache server can return completely
> different results. Obviously, most of the results are
> due to user confi
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:13:08AM -, William Rowe wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Wed Jun 21 23:13:07 2006
> New Revision: 416265
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416265&view=rev
> Log:
>
> New SSLLogLevelDebugDump [ None (default) | IO (not bytes) | Bytes ]
> configures the I/O
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Ivan Ristic wrote:
> I have a problem with the bundled PCRE that I am not sure how to
> resolve. Basically, in a module I need to access more functionality
> than provided by the Apache PCRE wrapper. (More specifically, I need
> to perform matching against
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:28:20PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:11:38PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:51:55AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Author: colm
> > > Date: Tue Jun 13 03:51:54 2006
> > > N
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:51:55AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: colm
> Date: Tue Jun 13 03:51:54 2006
> New Revision: 413861
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413861&view=rev
> Log:
> A keepalive response need not neccessarily have included any content-length
> header, handle
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> to with a URL. That is no big deal. The big deal is that 5D002
> classification also means that it is illegal for the ASF to knowingly
> allow anyone residing in, or a citizen of, the T-8 countries, or anyone
> on the "denied pers
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:00:29AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> Plüm wrote:
> >>Von: Joe Orton
> >>On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >>>Okay, let me put it in a different way. The alternatives are
> >>>
> >
Thanks for doing the research, Roy.
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Okay, let me put it in a different way. The alternatives are
>
> 1) retain the status quo, forbid distributing ssl binaries, and
> include in our documentation that people in banned countries
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:17:27AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Add example/default allow-from for localhost, please???
>
> >
> > SetHandler server-status
> > Require host .example.com
> >+Allow from 127
> >
>
> I think yo
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> > The "1" requirement is hardcoded in the APR_FIND_APx calls
> > anyway, so I
> > don't think this is a big deal. They could all be replaced with some
> > variable I suppose.
>
> Can you replace them with a variable, suc
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:01:44PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 04/19/2006 12:57 PM,
> > Author: jorton
> > Date: Wed Apr 19 03:57:20 2006
> > New Revision: 395211
...
> > +if test "x$with_included_apr" = "xyes"; then
> > + apr_found=reconfig
> > + apr_config="$srcdir/srclib/apr/apr-1-conf
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 05/18/2006 10:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > cache_storage.c: In function `cache_generate_key_default':
> > cache_storage.c:383: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
> > target type
>
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:16:43PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cache/cache_storage.c (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cache/cache_storage.c Wed May 17 12:16:43 2006
...
> @@ -375,15 +380,18 @@
> }
> }
> else {
> -scheme = "htt
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:56:35PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: sctemme
> Date: Mon May 15 11:56:34 2006
> New Revision: 406716
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=406716&view=rev
> Log:
> Propose backport of ServerName directive enhancement
Hey, let's put new features in the
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:49:38PM +0200, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
> from time to time, I spend time to look at apache code source to see if
> something can be cleaned up a bit in the hope either to speed it up or, at
> least, to make it more readable.
>
> For example :
> http://issues.apache.org
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:11:42PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > I would personally prefer abort to exit...
>
> is write()'ing a static error message an option too?
I don't know if more effort than this is required to make wr
There a few choices for what to do in the oom handler: 1.3 fprintf's to
stderr, then does exit(1), which doesn't seem particularly wise since
fprintf can itself malloc; could do similarly, could just exit(1) or
even just exit(APEXIT_CHILDSICK); but then nothing gets logged. With
abort() at lea
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:12:58AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> >OK, we all know we get some embarrassing regressions in our new
> >releases. PR#39490 in 1.3.35.
>
> That is an unexpected and unwelcome regression. If I had
> known about it I wo
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >>This was on XFS and on an NFS mount. It should be noted that this
> >>works on a 32bit (also Ubuntu Breezy) machine with identical config.
> >
>
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:26:56AM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
> >OK, what filesystem? Colm had reported the same thing on Debian/IA64,
> >which was on an NFS mount, IIRC. If you adjust apr_brigade_insert_file
> >to only allow bucke
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Joe Orton
> >
> > The way I would expect it to work would be by passing f->next in to
> > the store_body callback, it looks doomed to e
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:46:09PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >>I've run into apr_brigade_insert_file() creating brigades that's not
> >>possible to sendfile() (EINVAL), this is with httpd-2.2.2 on Ubuntu
> >
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> I've run into apr_brigade_insert_file() creating brigades that's not
> possible to sendfile() (EINVAL), this is with httpd-2.2.2 on Ubuntu
> Breezy Linux amd64 (64bit). The file in question is 4.3GB, and it
> seems that sendfil
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:21:08AM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> On March 3, 2006 08:11 am, Joe Orton wrote:
> [snip]
> > Log:
> > * modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c (shmcb_safe_clear): Mark with
> > "noinline" attribute for GCC > 3.
> [snip]
>
>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:21:27PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> Another thing: I guess on systems with no mmap support the current
> implementation
> of mod_disk_cache will eat up a lot of memory if you cache a large local file,
> because it transforms the file bucket(s) into heap bucket
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:44:07AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rooneg
> Date: Fri Apr 21 20:44:05 2006
> New Revision: 396063
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396063&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge the fcgi-proxy-dev branch to trunk, adding a FastCGI back end for
> mod_proxy. This
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:35:23PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Please test and vote on releasing httpd 2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util
> 1.2.7.
Belatedly +1, testall passes for:
PASS: RHEL4/ppc64 RHEL3/i686 RHEL4/i686 FC5/i686 FC4/i686 RHEL3/ppc64
FC3/i686 RHEL3/x86_64 FC5/x86_64
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:40:13PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:09:12AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On 4/15/06, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I might have asked this before, but I've forgotten the answer, and so has
> > > google. Has any of the
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:47:22PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our
> flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre community, and liasoning back
> our changes to pcre to it's project?
I would expect that anybody who commits local changes
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:53:24AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> What's really needed here is a "--with-included-apr"-type flag which
> forces use of the bundled sources over installed versions, rather than
> trying to overload --with-apr to do that.
e.g. this, slightly hac
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 03:23:11PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> It seems this can be trivially solved by ensuring we defer this test until
> after we invoke the sub-configure of apr and apr-util.
The "sufficient version" test is currently only used if the
sub-configure of ap[ru] is *not* invoked
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:44:08AM +0100, Marc Stern wrote:
> I use %{SSL_CLIENT_CERT}e with 2.0.54 (patched to get mod_ssl headers).
> Is this the problem ? Was it fixed after 2.0.54 ?
Yes, 2.2.0 has the %{...}s support which does this properly. There's a
backport for 2.0 here:
http://people.ap
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:28:35AM +0100, Marc Stern wrote:
> It seems that the PEM-encoded certificate coming out of OpenSSL (0.9.8a in
> my case) contains new lines without leading space, which is interpreted as a
> new HTTP header.
In what configuration does this happen? If you are using
%{SS
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:26:21AM -, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Author: jerenkrantz
> Date: Fri Mar 17 18:26:19 2006
> New Revision: 386792
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386792&view=rev
> Log:
> * acinclude.m4: When enabling a static library, ensure that the module's
> dependen
Found by the Coverity report, this one looks like a real bug:
check_provider_list has a if() branch to handle the passed-in
current_provider being NULL, but never sets it to anything else;
current_provider is later dereferenced unconditionally.
joe
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:53:25PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:45:39PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > Not as such. It doesn't need to: it's a MUST in CGI:
> >
> > 7.2.1.3. Status
> > The "Status" header field is used
(somewhat more appropriate $SUBJECT now ;)
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:20:08PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> There is an interesting bug regarding this topic:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38763
>
> It seems that we do not have to worry about resending POSTs at all becaus
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:45:39PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 14:56, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > > > >I've prepared a (simpler) alternative patch, which fixes the real
> > > > > issue and will make packages available for testing.
&
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:32:07AM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 09:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >The fix committed upstream prevents handling of conditional requests with
> > > a CGI script which outputs an explicit (albeit redundant) "Status: 200"
> > > header. This wo
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:32:32AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 02/20/2006 11:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Maybe. Got another idea in the meantime. Maybe it is because we use the same
> >>socket to a backend, but we create a new conn_rec
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:52:31PM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
> > I found only one pertinent error message in the log:
> >
> > [Mon Feb 20 10:40:08 2006] [debug] proxy_util.c(2118): proxy: HTTP:
> > connection complete to 127.0.0.1:8529 (localhost.localdomain)
>
> But this is HTTP to the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
>
>
> >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Joe Orton
> >> >
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200602.mbox
> /ajax/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:53:27AM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
> > Von: Joe Orton
> > > New Revision: 378032
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378032&view=rev
> > > Log:
> > > *) mod_proxy: Fix KeepAlives not being
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:44:43PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Feb 15 08:44:42 2006
> New Revision: 378032
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378032&view=rev
> Log:
> *) mod_proxy: Fix KeepAlives not being allowed and set to
> backend servers. PR38602. [Rue
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:11:22AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 2/14/2006 at 3:50 am, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>
> >> The other problem that I see in the configuration is that the
> >
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > The range support right now isn't smart enough to clear r->status_line
> > when it sets a new status code (206, 416). That needs to be fixed to
> > avoid breaking range reque
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 2/13/2006 at 8:39:41 am, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:26:39AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >> Yes, we do need to make this change. With the provider based
> >> r
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:02:24AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 02/13/2006 04:37 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:57:14PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This change (I think) is triggering the bad pool ancestry abort() in the
> > tables code: t
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:26:39AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Yes, we do need to make this change. With the provider based
> rearchitecting of authentication in httpd 2.2, this left authorization
> in an unpredictable state especially when using multiple authorization
> types. You were neve
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:57:14PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Sat Feb 11 12:57:12 2006
> New Revision: 377053
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377053&view=rev
> Log:
> * Do not remove the connection headers from r->headers_in. They are needed
> by the http
901 - 1000 of 1564 matches
Mail list logo
