FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the
latest version.
- David
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev
wrote:
> With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes
> up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish.
>
&g
so why not? The only reason why not, I'd say,
is if there's an existing fuzzing target that trivially exercises the same code
- even then it's fine, it's just wasted effort.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 4:02 AM david korczynski
mailto:da...@adalogics.com>> wrote:
Hi al
initiated and see get some insights as to whether the
results are of interest.
On 19/07/2021 16:26, david korczynski wrote:
I am happy to put in efforts in getting the coverage up. If I do not
succeed in getting coverage up to a decent amount then I am okay with
that personally.
On 19/07/2021 15:27
I am happy to put in efforts in getting the coverage up. If I do not
succeed in getting coverage up to a decent amount then I am okay with
that personally.
On 19/07/2021 15:27, Eric Covener wrote:
I am in favour of getting our server into a regular fuzzing setup
and would subscribe to such repor
Google account (for login purposes).
Let me know if you are happy to integrate httpd into OSS-Fuzz.
Kind regards,
David
ADA Logics Ltd is registered in England. No: 11624074.
Registered office: 266 Banbury Road, Post Box 292,
OX2 7DL, Oxford, Oxfordshire , United Kingdom
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2018, at 5:55 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>
>> I hate to break this to you, and I do not want to discredit the
>> amazing work all the contributors here are doing, but httpd 2.4 is of
>> miserable, miserable
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Apr 2018, at 21:35, David Zuelke wrote:
>>
>> I'm not saying no directives should ever be added in point releases or
>> anything, but the constant backporting of *features* to 2.4 has
>>
The main difference is that you have a release branch in which fixes
to bugs or regressions found during 2.4.x RCs can be made, while work
on 2.4.(x+1) can continue in the main 2.4 branch.
Another benefit is that people who do automated builds (e.g. me) can
grep for "RC" in the version number and
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:55 AM, David Zuelke wrote:
>>
>>
>> I hate to break this to you, and I do not want to discredit the
>> amazing work all the contributors here are doing, but httpd 2.4 is of
>
Yup, that's exactly it. Have a release branch, iterate there, and in
the meantime, work in the version series branch can continue. That
brings one huge benefit over the current model already: no freezes
necessary, no potential additional breaks after a "burned" version.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:1
hat mess with amazing
results.
I am also happy to make introductions to release managers and
maintainers there. Heck I am betting some of them would happily serve
as tutors for the httpd project ;) I'm certainly willing to help too.
But IMO you need a clean cut and shake up the entire process, not just
a little, because otherwise you won't get rid of some of the old
habits that have been plaguing the project.
David
and that's it.
Debian and Ubuntu, for instance, just pick the latest PHP that's
released at the time the freeze for a version happens, and that's it.
>>> On Apr 13, 2018, at 2:28 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>>>
>>> Remember the thread I started on that qui
Remember the thread I started on that quite a while ago? ;)
IMO:
- x.y.0 for new features
- x.y.z for bugfixes only
- stop the endless backporting
- make x.y.0 releases more often
- x.y.0 goes through alpha, beta, RC phases
- x.y.z goes through RC phases
That's how PHP has been doing it for a fe
You need to use SetHandler. You can't use rewrites with ProxyPass because of
the order of evaluation.
Example config:
Define php-fpm unix:/tmp/php-fpm.sock|fcgi://php-fpm
# make sure the proxy is registered with the unix socket; we can then use just
"fcgi://php-fpm" in proxy and rewrites direct
On 10. Jul 2017, at 16:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.07.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Jacob Champion:
>> Administrators using prefork who would like to switch to HTTP/2 in the
>> future need to understand the limitations of the prefork architecture they
>> have selected. And sure, our users can re
On 26.01.2017, at 18:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> As of HEAD on trunk, configs with the below seem to
> work as expected:
>
> AddType application/x-php7-fpm .php
> Action application/x-php7-fpm /fpm virtual
>
>SetHandler proxy:fcgi://localhost:9001
>
>
> --
>
>
> S
On 26.01.2017, at 06:16, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:12 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>>> AddType application/x-php7-fpm .php
>>> Action application/x-php7-fpm /php7-fpm virtual
>>>
>>>SetHandler proxy:fcgi://localhost:9000
>&
On 20.01.2017, at 21:37, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2017, at 7:47 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>
>> I'd actually like to question the whole practice of porting features back to
>> older branches. I think that's the core reason why trunk is in total
>
if not,
Apache will show its 404 page and not FPM
SetHandler proxy:fcgi://…
?
David
; The *idea* was to look for ".php" in the actual URL for example :)
It doesn't have to be ".php" for PHP to be able to run it. You can execute any
file extension (that sometimes requires fiddling with settings, e.g. with
PHP-FPM, but still).
David
> On 20.01.2017, at 15:34, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:12 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>> I don't know any framework/language/library out there that handles it that
>> strictly. Nginx, or Ruby, or PHP, or whatever...
>>
>&
On 20.01.2017, at 02:00, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> We branch off from the 2.4.25 tag. This is our low-risk 2.4.25.x patch line.
>> There are no new features or large code changes to this branch, there are no
>> refactorings or whitespace ch
I don't know any framework/language/library out there that handles it that
strictly. Nginx, or Ruby, or PHP, or whatever...
From x.y.z to x.y.z+1, retain full compatibility.
From x.y.z to x.y+1.0, keep external API compatibility, break ABI if needed,
break internal API if absolutely needed
Fro
Please no .micro releases. Most of the world is now trying to stick to
http://semver.org principles.
Why not just keep 2.4 for maintenance, and start working on 2.6 immediately? Or
2.5?
I honestly think that the current "odd numbers are unstable" approach is not
helpful with this whole situati
On 19.01.2017, at 19:00, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On 01/18/2017 01:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> After all, it's easier for the FCGI server to know the SCRIPT_NAME
>> than httpd to "guess"...
>
> I think the recent breakage calls this assumption into question. The server
> admin knows exactly
clients. PHP-FPM and fcgiwrap, for
> example, assume that SCRIPT_FILENAME should point to the script that should
> be executed to handle the request. We need to standardize it.
There's one more caveat around SCRIPT_FILENAME, I think: it might not be the
same for httpd and the FCGI backend if they're running on separate machines!
David
On 31 Dec 2016, at 00:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> * the longer 2.6/3.0 takes the more half-baked/half-finished stuff
> accumulates
> that needs to be fixed before a release.
>
> But I don't have any ideas how to resolve this.
Did you see my "A new release process?" thread? :)
butions, can be fixed. PHP is the perfect example, and I think HTTPD
would be wise to at least consider following this example.
Happy New Year!
David
On 21.07.2016, at 16:27, Eric Covener wrote:
> We have httpoxy as well as a rewrite+fastcgi regression in the queue.
> Jim, do you have a near-term release in you we can plan around?
Just to *bump* this one up... ;)
David
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your report. I've forwarded this on to the Apache httpd
project who is responsible for maintaining that specific website.
Thanks,
--David
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Jerry Lucas wrote:
> Hello Webmaster,
>
>
>
> I found a broken link on th
On 18.11.2015, at 08:11, Noel Butler wrote:
> absolutely not! I personally only update phpmyadmin once, on initial major
> release, because I (like many others) were so of updating it every few days .
> You obviously dont manage very many public facing servers then, I have that
> advantage of
You should not append the trailing slash. REQUEST_URI gets appended, hence the
double slash.
On 10.09.2014, at 10:26, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
> Yes, I've tried their latest versions from GIT (with the #65641 fix (PHP-FPM
> incorrectly defines the SCRIPT_NAME variable when using Apache)).
>
UDS have been supported since 2.4.8, see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101#c21
On 08.07.2014, at 11:22, Yonah Russ wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any update on this?
> What is the status of
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101#c1 ?
> Will the UDS patch ma
Hi all,
is there any chance to get
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1573626 merged into 2.4.x
as well, for 2.4.10?
Would be pretty handy for a lot of people; it's a lot easier to use than
rewrites or ProxyPass(Match) directives.
David
security parameter,
but that seems quite dangerous since it will not prevent a targeted attack
on a specific session.
Thanks,
David Huang
or reference the bug is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53692
Thanks,
David
diff -ur -x '*.o' -x '*.lo' httpd-2.4.4.orig/modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c httpd-2.4.4/modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c
--- httpd-2.4.4.orig/modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c 2012-12-16 07:38:45.0
.4 compiled from .tar.gz using the
instructions here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/platform/rpm.html
Thanks,
David Mansfield
Listen 0.0.0.0:8877
DocumentRoot "/var/www/form_auth_test"
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/var/www/form_auth_test_cgi/"
AllowOverride None
R
On 05/08/2013 10:34 AM, David Mansfield wrote:
On 05/03/2013 05:28 PM, David Mansfield wrote:
I'm hitting this bug (I think):
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53692
This bug makes the mode described in the docs. for mod_auth_form
called "Inline with Body Pr
On 05/03/2013 05:28 PM, David Mansfield wrote:
I'm hitting this bug (I think):
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53692
This bug makes the mode described in the docs. for mod_auth_form
called "Inline with Body Preservation" impossible, because it's
impo
ta has any provision for saving the
brigade anywhere so I imagine this will have to be done via a kept_body,
but I'm really lost at this point.
Any ideas?
--
Thanks,
David Mansfield
Cobite, INC.
Hi all!
In response to my bug post at
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=83501, a maintainer referred me
to Apache::Test which I see has moved to this list.
I just went tried to cpan CGI-Application-Dispatch on a newly built CentOS5
box.Cpan diligently runs the following test c
52 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:04:05 +0200
> Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> > On 11 Jun 2012, at 8:56 PM, David Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > I am wondering if there are any plans to add OAuth 2 capabilities
> into the base authorization capabilities of
ce anomalies similar to those referenced in
the
discussion threads regarding these patches.
Thank you,
David
;ll simply continuing
using worker, or follow your lead and use a separate httpd for SSL connections.
Best,
David
-Original Message-
From: Tom Evans
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:42 PM, David Dabbs wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I’m considering changing over to the event MPM, but as of
-Original Message-
From: Igor Galić [mailto:i.ga...@brainsware.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:16 PM
To: us...@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Event MPM in httpd 2.2.x
- "David Dabbs" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I’m considering changin
bably going to
run some sort of load test.
Having read the thread, I don't think we'd need to do anything other than
throw a lot of load at it, right?
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Niklas Edmundsson [mailto:ni...@acc.umu.se]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011
I see that the changes described below were applied to the trunk worker and
event MPM code.
Would you consider applying it to the 2.2x branch? I will do so myself and
test in my env.
Many thanks,
David Dabbs
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent
sponse codes)
would probably do it, but I don't think that's possible, right?
Thanks,
David
[Mon Sep 13 04:12:25 2010] [error] [client 71.225.73.189] request failed:
error reading the headers
[Mon Sep 13 04:25:22 2010] [error] [client 210.204.226.18] request failed:
error reading the he
Newbie input filter module writer, so apologies if this is the wrong list.
>From inside an input filter module, when handling filter routine calls and
>iterating
over buckets, with chunked encoding, what's the (or a) termination condition
for end of request
body? Is it a EOS metadata bucket?
We're looking for an experienced consultant who can guide us through
writing a new filter module for a custom compression/encryption
technique. We have a prototype output filter that's "working", and need
help and guidance with the input filter. Our prototype was based on
mod_deflate, but the un
lib64 and perhaps /lib64 and /usr/local/lib64 on 64 bit platforms?
2. I got a bunch of Perl test failures, but it looks like they were known. It
doesn't look like this patch has been applied yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-dev&m=125501679623914
Should it be?
Thanks,
David
I initially opened a bug for this downstream (See Fedora #523903[1]),
but the Fedora mod_fcgid maintainer Paul suggested I open up the
discussion here.
I was recently working on configuring some of my servers to use the
worker MPM instead of prefork to be able to handle more concurrent
connections
prueba
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm]
Sent: Lunes, 30 de Marzo de 2009 08:03 p.m.
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core
Paul Querna wrote:
> mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expos
unsubscribe
ject: Re: Mod dumpio module
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:30:03 -0600
David Martínez Albiter wrote:
> request_rec *r = f->r;
Dumpio is a connection-level filter. There is no request.
(and why do you suppose there'd be a cookie in r->notes?)
--
Nick Kew
Application D
Hi All,
I try to modify the modulo mod_dumpio.c, we need that this module log the I/O
information (Original funcionality) plus the directive "%{Cookie}n" (this one,
generate by the modulo mod_usertrack.c). We try with the next code to get the
directive:
request_rec *r = f->r;
const char
-Original Message-
From: dev-h...@httpd.apache.org [mailto:dev-h...@httpd.apache.org]
Sent: Jueves, 26 de Febrero de 2009 05:43 p.m.
To: David Martínez Albiter
Subject: confirm subscribe to dev@httpd.apache.org
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
dev@httpd.apache.org ma
Hi,
I've solved the problem, though I may not exactly understand how.
It was an issue with the way I was building the module, which was
fixed once I added in the flags I got from "apr-config --cppflags".
(I used to rant that the mostly-undocumented design change to apxs in
apache 2.0 was
Kaspar Brand wrote:
Making SNI support configurable at runtime also seems a more attractive
solution to me - it would basically mean that in ssl_init_ctx(), the SNI
callback is not registered unless it's explicitly configured. I would
suggest using something like
SSLEnableSNI port [port] ...
d ASL (or?)
I'd be happy to sign a software grant, if necessary, or even if not
necessary just to provide added peace of mind. All I need is
instructions on how to proceed -- where should I fax the form and so on.
-David
I was experimenting with mod_session a bit and ran into a segfault when
a cgi script sets a cookie with a null value (eg. "key="). Basically
mod_session tries to do a sanity check on the null value by passing it
to ap_unescape_all which is causing the segfault. But, if you look at
the code th
Thanks for the link and description Brad. It makes sense now. Explains
why the default config was giving me a 403. The 'Require all denied'
was being inherited from the root directory config. Would it be
appropriate to add something like the attached patched to httpd.conf.in?
Index: docs/c
I tried to build Apache from trunk tonight and noticed that this patch
broke something. I'm getting a 403 error when trying to browse to a
clean install. I'm by no means an expert here, but I noticed a few
things which are noted below...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Fri
er merge that effort with ours or
> leave well alone. In practice, a merge would imply development
> moving to this list.
>
> If David is happy to subscribe to this list and make it his
> primary forum for the module, then +1.
I have indeed subscribed to this list, and I would much prefe
anyway). If you have a million machines,
then this won't work, but at that point you probably have enough money
to solve this problem some other way.
-David
mod_info and apachectl -V both output SUEXEC info, even if suexec has been
explicitly turned off with --disable-suexec.
example of current apachectl -V after running with ./configure
--disable-suexec:
>bin/apachectl -V
...
Server compiled with
-D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/worker"
-D APR_HAS
The response to TRACE when "TraceEnable Off" is not used on an EBCDIC
platform is partially in ASCII and partially in EBCDIC (part readable, part
garbage).
routine ap_send_http_trace in modules/http_filters.c recreates the request
and echoes it back when TRACE is requested.
form_header_field (from
Hi Seth,
I'm glad to help out with particular questions on either side -- mysql
or apache.
JD
On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Joe Lewis wrote:
Seth Cherney wrote:
OK, I signed onto this list about 4 months ago, and have never seen
anything remotely close to my low level of skill posed as a
On Feb 4, 2008 1:20 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2008-02-04 20:41:47 David McCreedy napisał(a):
> >> It seems that the pcreposix.h header file, which pcreposix.c includes,
> isn't
> >>
.h is auto-generated and I'm just not seeing it?
Or is it really missing? And can it be added back?
Thanks,
-David McCreedy
+1 for Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41 on TPF
-David
On Jan 9, 2008 2:00 AM, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2008, at 3:10 PM, David Sklar wrote:
>
> > Any comments on the patch would be appreciated -- it's wonderful, it's
> > a good solution but could be improved, it's a rid
my problem
in a test setup with mod_proxy+mod_ssl running on port 443
reverse-proxying DAV requests over to mod_dav running on (a different
machine) on port 80.
Any comments on the patch would be appreciated -- it's wonderful, it's
a good solution but could be improved, it's a ri
When I run some Flood tests I am getting timeout errors. It appears
as if Flood kills threads if they encounter a timeout on a given url
in a urllist, even if it hasn't reached the end of the list. Where is
this timeout value set, and is it possible for me to change this
value so that I can
n't support Apache 2 yet so no vote on those.)
-David
Yes,
updated our build and can now compile and link fine,
Thanks,
David
On 8/2/07, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:18:08PM -0400, David Jones wrote:
> > zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly.
> > After re
zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly.
After revisions 153273/153266 to ./Makefile.in there is no ability to add
any flags as buildmark.c is made without them directly using compile, i.e:
PROGRAM_PRELINK = $(COMPILE) $(top_srcdir)/server/buildmark.c
This patch will al
>On June 05, 2007 1:45 AM Rüdiger wrote
>> On June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
>> I've figured out why some pids aren't being "unset" and I think it could
>> affect other platforms besides TPF.
>> They're hitting the
June 04, 2007 5:51 PM David McCreedy wrote:
>On 06/01/2007 05:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>I think I squashed those. Could you check out
>>trunk and try another test? Thanks!
>>
>
>It fixes the "Bad pid" error but
_table on SIG_IDLE_KILLs.
I'll have to track down why.
It seems OK on Linux but I see SIG_IDLE_KILL being sent twice to the same PID
before it calls unset_pid_table.
That seems odd to me.
-David McCreedy
I put 2 posts out awhile ago and haven't seen anything on them, can someone
commit/comment on them, or should i bugzilla?
post on Feb 23: PATCH: incorrect use of an enum in util_ldap.h struct
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
post on Feb 19: Remove
log but leaves the scoreboard slot
as-is.
So when we come through perform_idle_server_maintenance the next time, the
same error is logged for the same slot and pid.
Again, and again.
Hopefully this is enough information to recreate the issues.
If I left something out please let me know.
-David McCreedy
llu"?
I found a lot of issues involving printing
Can I write a hack to ensure this (possible detecting the architecture with
#defines then writing the correct printf placeholder from the #define)? Is
there a more graceful method in APR for handling situations like this?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Da
s unknown
to me. And mod_xmlns plays a role in these usages, unknown to me.
Might one or two of you direct me to some more info as to enlighten
this dim bulb;)
Sam
--
David Wortham
Senior Web Applications Developer
Unspam Technologies, Inc.
1901 Prospector Dr. #30
Park City, UT 84060
(435) 513-0672
's':
h->alg = ALG_APSHA;
break;
-#if APR_HAVE_CRYPT_H
+#if (!(defined(WIN32) || defined(TPF) || defined(NETWARE)))
case 'd':
h->alg = ALG_CRYPT;
break;
On 4/4/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
implementations? Is it guaranteed to return a
writeable directory?
Thanks,
Dave
On 4/4/07, David Wortham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for such a simple question, but I have not been able to find the
answer yet.
Is there a function in APR to retrieve the default Apache logs directory?
When my
rs with the same MX/domain based on different directories,
you may run into session problems (I'm not speaking from experience, just
conjecture).
Regards,
Dave
On 3/23/07, Danie Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "David Wortham" <[EMAIL PROT
ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level that just checks platforms for
htdbm.c
Also appended is the semi-related patch for htpasswd.c that adds TPF to the
platforms checked in 2 cases where its missed, which seems like an
oversight.
=
You aren't walking through a
sequential list of URLs in apr_tables are you? Are the "URI"s you're
storing full URIs, domain names, or MXs? Perhaps you could use some help
with your overall design of the module (or maybe there's an existing module
that does what
d
process (on potentially different).
Maybe this page can shed some light on your questions:
http://www.fmc-modeling.org/projects/apache/html/3_3Extending_Apache.html
Regards,
Dave
--
David Wortham
Senior Web Applications Developer
Unspam Technologies, Inc.
1901 Prospector Dr. #30
Park City, UT 84060
Re: Jeff's last note, yes httpd does call crypt() directly,
Any other questions that need discussion / resolution?
David Jones
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/16/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
ol_pipe also defined as
lt_lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_pipe='"sed -n -e '\''s/^.*[
]\\([BDRT][BDRT]*\\)[ ][ ]*\\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\\)\$/\\1 \\2
\\2/p'\''"'
(pardon my line breaks)
I am not sure what is done with configs and dumps traditionaly
Support utilities should enable crypt() iff it is available.
Using the presence of does not reliably determine if crypt() is
available.
Specifically z/OS supports crypt, but does not have , so it is
broken when checking APR_HAVE_CRYPT_H.
Added crypt to AC_CHECK_FUNCS in httpd's configure.in, thi
&highlight=build+apache+mod+ssl++visual+express
Hopefully you can get some use out of this.
Regards,
David Wortham
On 3/13/07, Chris Kukuchka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile a module against the Apache 2.2.4 codebase using
Visual C++ .NET. The compile stops wit
inks will help you
get the gist of the overall structure of writing modules and using the
module API. When learning, it helps to know what version of Apache your
sample code is written for (look for STANDARD_MODULE_STUFF or
STANDARD20_MODULE_STUFF in the module definition).
Hope this helps,
D
he makefile magic that
defines APR_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK as well. Also include a patch for util_ldap.c
that will define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT if the version of apr-util does not
include the #define.
Brad
>>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 8:36 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David
Jones&quo
r person was trying to do the same thing two weeks ago but no
one ever responded to him.
Does anyone have any suggestions or places to look?
Thanks in advance,
David Wortham
Hello again developers,
I don't fully expect anyone to be able to answer this question. At this
point, I am just looking for ideas to try.
I am still trying to get my module to make a POST request to an external
server (I am using a subrequest that bounces off of mod_proxy to the
external s
first suggestion better, putting the
#ifdef in apr_ldap.h.in. This seems a little more straight forward rather
than hiding the value in configure.
Brad
>>> On 3/1/2007 at 7:07 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David
Jones"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How
PROTECTED]> wrote:
David,
1) I tried /gethint.php without any GET/POST parameters. I got nothing
and it could not be cached even with force-caching directive. I do the
same thing for clienthint.js. It could work and display the source code
and could be cached.
2), The first part is the responses for
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
