Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] so, rock on svn. yes, yes, I'm +1. Thanks for taking care of it. Don't forget about preserving the frozen cvs though. I have lots of modified files all over. Yah, the CVS repository will remain for a long time read-only. (don't exactly know what

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-19 Thread Sencer Kutlug
I say we move up. -sencer On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:37:16 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CLI mod_aspdotnet folks; do we want to maintain httpd/cli/mod_aspdotnet/ or drop the cli/ container, placing all of our modules at the httpd/ root parallel to mod_mbox,

RE: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-18 Thread Larry Toppi
Title: RE: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion Sweet! I would vote to move it up one level. Thanks, Larry. -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 5:37 PM To: CLI Dev Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-16 Thread Bill Stoddard
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the sources from the SVN

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-16 Thread Sander Striker
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 07:03, Bill Stoddard wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-16 Thread Sander Striker
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 09:34, Sander Striker wrote: On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 07:03, Bill Stoddard wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Did this happen? Some irresponsible partying is delaying the process a bit... To clarify: I was planning on moving forward yesterday after The Incredibles. I got

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-15 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] so, rock on svn. yes, yes, I'm +1. Thanks for taking care of it. Don't forget about preserving the frozen cvs though. I have lots of modified files all over. Yah, the CVS repository will remain for a long time read-only. (don't exactly know what

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Yoshiki Hayashi
[Hope moderators won't discard this mail to lists that I'm not subscribed to] Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by at the Hackathon and we

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Andr Malo
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Garrett Rooney
André Malo wrote: * Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:39 AM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In case that nobody has already thought about it: Does it sound like a good idea, to use svn:externals to retrieve the proper apr(-util) versions? I talked that over with Ben Collins-Sussman on #apachecon yesterday,

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Geoffrey Young
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the sources from

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Let's not forget the 1.3 docs, unless we can somehow combine the 2. When you checkout/export apache-1.3, a subset of htdocs in httpd-docs-1.3 comes along for the ride -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by at the Hackathon and we

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Geoffrey Young
It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into modperl-2.0 check out. As long as this is all done at once there should be no problem. None of these projects had any branching so it shouldn't be a

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into modperl-2.0 check out. As long as this is all done at once there should be no problem. None of these projects had any branching so it

[NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-13 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the sources from the SVN repository. I'm

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-13 Thread Yoshiki Hayashi
[Hope moderators won't discard this mail to lists that I'm not subscribed to] Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to