On 2005.11.10 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Question;
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that mismatched posix open()/close(), malloc()/free() can
all cause serious problems,
On Thursday 01 December 2005 22:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
On 2005.11.10 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Question;
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:40:25PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have 6.0, 2000/.NET, 2003, and 2005 sitting here, and will build whichever
flavor is deemed 'appropriate'.
If nobody speaks up, I'm building 'same old, same old' under MSVCRT.
I think that's appropriate, 2005 is a bit of
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:40:25PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have 6.0, 2000/.NET, 2003, and 2005 sitting here, and will build whichever
flavor is deemed 'appropriate'.
If nobody speaks up, I'm building 'same old, same old' under MSVCRT.
I think that's
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:40:25PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have 6.0, 2000/.NET, 2003, and 2005 sitting here, and will build
whichever
flavor is deemed 'appropriate'.
If nobody speaks up, I'm building 'same old, same old'
: Win32 binary distributions 2.1.9-beta and onwards
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:40:25PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have 6.0, 2000/.NET, 2003, and 2005 sitting here, and will build
whichever
flavor is deemed 'appropriate'.
If nobody
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Question;
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that mismatched posix open()/close(), malloc()/free() can
all cause serious problems, so a single
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:07:56AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that mismatched posix open()/close(), malloc()/free() can
all
Nick Kew wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Talking of windows builds, where's mod_ssl seems to be something of
a FAQ in user support. Why is it a problem *now* to include it?
You can find some of that discussion burried in legal-discuss@, while
the new VP of legal affairs is taking up the
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Question;
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that mismatched posix open()/close(), malloc()/free() can
all cause serious
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 17:02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
One decision to be made by the project is; will -we- ship openssl
binaries? Or the module built against some .dll versions available
on www.openssl.org?
Surely, the latter, and point to it in our docs!
Datapoint: mod_proxy_html
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Question;
I'm looking for input what version of visual c++ we should build apr 1.x
and httpd 2.1.x and onwards with. As most are aware, discrepancies in
the clib mean that mismatched posix open()/close(), malloc()/free() can
12 matches
Mail list logo
