Hi,
First, I would like to bring back (again) the subject of mod_mbox
helper scripts and program on the table.
I understand why these scripts are important in order to maintain the
ASF mail archives website. These scripts call some helper programs
(actually contained in the trunk/module-2.0/ dire
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:56:38PM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> I understand why these scripts are important in order to maintain the
> ASF mail archives website. These scripts call some helper programs
> (actually contained in the trunk/module-2.0/ directory) to process the
> mailbox files.
N
Hi,
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 09:22:18]:
> > I guess you've been using binaries compiled long ago, before the API
> > breakage, but since a lot of improvments and changes in the APR during
> > this period of time, I just wonder how the whole thing can
> > work.
>
> No.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:22:18AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I think they do belong and should be included in a release. Namely, I
> don't buy Roy's arguments against including them. The potential benefit to
> understanding how mod_mbox works outweighs the slight cost of including
> some
* Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 18:44:51]:
> If "someone" were to contemplate making a general version of those
> scripts - what would have a reasonable chance of getting accepted? perl?
> ksh? C?
I don't see why these scripts have to run with Zsh. They should be
able to run with SH
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> * Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 18:44:51]:
>
> > If "someone" were to contemplate making a general version of those
> > scripts - what would have a reasonable chance of getting accepted? perl?
> > ksh? C?
>
> I don'
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:22:18AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think they do belong and should be included in a release. Namely, I
don't buy Roy's arguments against including them. The potential benefit to
understanding how mod_mbox works outweighs the slight cost of i
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
> Python!
Excellent choice - at least that way I won't have to even consider
trying ;)
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:43:53PM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> If one is able to build mod_mbox and make Apache use it, he is also
> able to setup his archives as described in the online documentation.
What documentation? The mod_mbox pages on our website don't give any
information on how to
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:55:37PM +0100, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
> > Python!
>
> Excellent choice - at least that way I won't have to even consider
> trying ;)
Even Perl would be an improvement over zsh. =) -- justin
* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 09:56:56]:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:43:53PM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
> > If one is able to build mod_mbox and make Apache use it, he is also
> > able to setup his archives as described in the online documentation.
>
> What documentatio
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:55:37PM +0100, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
Python!
Excellent choice - at least that way I won't have to even consider
trying ;)
Even Perl would be an improvement over zsh. =) -- justin
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:55:37PM +0100, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
Python!
Excellent choice - at least that way I won't have to even consider
trying ;)
Even Perl would be an improvement over z
* Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 17:56:38]:
> Finally, I would like to know your feelings about the surgery branch
> that was created a few weeks ago : the module is operational and this
> branch provide a cleaner and more evolutive directory structure, as
> well as a complete un
14 matches
Mail list logo
