svn commit: r1824592 -
>> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> >
>> >> Moving a member in a well-defined st
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 09:20
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 -
> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>>
Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
>>> generally accepted change (expanding the length
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> This probably does not apply to 2.4.x (as a strong statement), in the
> meantime we at least need the helpers and give a hand at updating the
> modules, if we can't avoid extending our own structs...
I agree this discussion, outside of an in
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
>> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.)
>> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into th
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> 1. We continue as we do now and allow extending structures at the end. We
>> should probably document more prominently that
>> copying / allocating / creating public structure
On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.)
> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just
> a longer struct" example.
>
Can you please g
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary
>> compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled.
>>
>>
>> This is clearly not true of several recent changes, even t
On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>
> In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary
> compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled.
>
>
> This is clearly not true of several recent changes, even though they
> impact relatively few third party modules.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
>> New Revision: 1824592
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824592&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update proposal with fix fo
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 07:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: minfrin
> >> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
> >> New Revision: 1824592
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org
On 02/19/2018 07:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
>> New Revision: 1824592
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824592&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update proposal with fix for rpluem/
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
> New Revision: 1824592
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824592&view=rev
> Log:
> Update proposal with fix for rpluem/jorton.
Extending dav_resource still breaks binary
15 matches
Mail list logo
