Hi All,
We have installed 64 bit Apache 2.2.4 on windows. We downloaded the installer
from http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries
The issue is when Apache is configured with a thirdparty module (64 bit as
well) and is started the error is shown in event viewer as:-
Faulting application
Now that I am really back, I'd like to reboot the intent to
TR all three. 2.2 has a current show-stopper however, with a veto
upon the patch by Nick.
Joe, many thanks for your review and valuable comments, first off! As
the person who contributed to the original SNI patch (authored by Peter
Sylvester/EdelWeb), I'll try to address your questions to the best of my
knowledge/ability.
An updated version of the patch (based on Guenter's latest
On 01/02/2008 05:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that I am really back, I'd like to reboot the intent to
TR all three. 2.2 has a current show-stopper however, with a veto
upon the patch by Nick.
You can solve this veto. Just vote for the vetoed patch plus for
* mod_proxy_ftp: Introduce
On Jan 2, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/02/2008 05:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that I am really back, I'd like to reboot the intent to
TR all three. 2.2 has a current show-stopper however, with a veto
upon the patch by Nick.
You can solve this veto. Just vote for the
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:56:23 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email
on why he didn't like it... Until that's resolved, the SS
still exists (though with a caveat)
In summary, I don't think that patch should spill outside
Hi.
For my module mod_i18n I would need an interface to content negotiation.
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?. By now
the only way to do this is to put variant files or a type map in the
file system and
Renu Tiwari wrote:
The issue is when Apache is configured with a thirdparty module (64 bit
as well)
Well, which module probably makes a difference, and if the crash isn't
present *without* this module, you should be contacting the author of
the module, not httpd.
and is started the error is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email
on why he didn't like it...
Well, he wanted a patch for a narrowly defined mod_proxy_ftp-specific
directive context, but offered a patch to apply a server_rec, while
Rudiger's patch is against the dir_rec
Joachim Zobel wrote:
For my module mod_i18n I would need an interface to content negotiation.
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?. By now
the only way to do this is to put variant files or a type map in
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:56:23 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email
on why he didn't like it... Until that's resolved, the SS
still exists (though with a caveat)
In summary, I
On 01/02/2008 07:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:56:23 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email
on why he didn't like it... Until that's resolved, the SS
On 01/02/2008 05:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that I am really back, I'd like to reboot the intent to
TR all three. 2.2 has a current show-stopper however, with a veto
upon the patch by Nick.
BTW: We have the same situation for 2.0.x. Only Nick did not put his
veto in the STATUS file in
FWIW, STATUS on the 2.x branches is cleaned up in anticipation
of the TR (there are no open patches for 1.3, afaik).
If you haven't already, I encourage everyone to 'svn up' and
at least run some prelim tests before I do the actual TR.
I've been working on getting my old Blade (Sol8) up and
Hi,
Like wrowe said... if it only happens with the module its mostlikely
the module and not httpd (or my binary of httpd in this case).
Although I've seen this before. The binaries on blackdot are compiled
with visual studio 2005 and link to MSVCR80.dll, if the module is
compiled against an
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 11:52 -0600 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Joachim Zobel wrote:
I want to say Dear mod_negotiation, I offer the following language
variants (for the current request). Which one do you choose?.
Wondering if this is worth a great deal of time until we define the
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:42:43 +0100
Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is probably some grand unified approach ahead, with filter
layers between VFSes that besides the usual filter stuff do URL
rewriting. Such an approach needs to be very well specified to keep
it simple enough to be
On 01/02/2008 08:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, STATUS on the 2.x branches is cleaned up in anticipation
of the TR (there are no open patches for 1.3, afaik).
FWIW, the reason that caused Nick to veto on 2.2.x is still there
on 2.0.x, so I guess it would be good if you could give it the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
First results for SuSE 10.2:
2.2.x:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/ssl/pr43738.t42 50.00% 2 4
7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Failed
A gentle reminder, the mod_deflate and mod_dav backports aren't
marked as showstoppers, but fix serious bugs. The mod_deflate
proposal seems to me particularly low-hanging fruit.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 20:52 + schrieb Nick Kew:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:42:43 +0100
Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is probably some grand unified approach ahead, with filter
layers between VFSes that besides the usual filter stuff do URL
rewriting. Such an
On 01/02/2008 08:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, STATUS on the 2.x branches is cleaned up in anticipation
of the TR (there are no open patches for 1.3, afaik).
If you haven't already, I encourage everyone to 'svn up' and
at least run some prelim tests before I do the actual TR.
I've
mod_ftp fans;
We seem to have identified and solved most post 0.9.0 candidate issues,
so it's time for another try.
Please fetch up the newly prepared httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1.tar.gz, or the
win32/netware/os2 suitable package httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1-crlf.zip (and
their md5/asc sigs) from:
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2008-01-02 14:29:59 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jan 2008) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2008-01-02 16:56:28 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jan 2008) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-12-03 15:06:37 -0500 (Mon, 03 Dec 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
Zvi Kave wrote:
Dear friends,
I am looking for filter module example which
works with database (MySQL for instance).
Please help,
Try combining mod_example, mod_auth_mysql, and mod_include. (A single
example won't work unless it is a code-copy situation, and that usually
doesn't work
27 matches
Mail list logo
