[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as httpd-2.4.53

Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as 2.4.53: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:45 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > Am 09.03.2022 um 14:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > >> > >> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to > >> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:21 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I've found make extraclean works a bit better Ah yes great hint, it avoids removing the configure files manually. Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

> On Mar 9, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:45 PM Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> >>> Am 09.03.2022 um 14:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: - configure for APR in the

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:07 schrieb Stefan Eissing : > > > >> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : >> >> >> >> On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>> Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53? >> >> With r1898786 I would say yes. > > Thanks everyone, will do. Everything prepped.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53? > > With r1898786 I would say yes. Thanks everyone, will do. > > Regards > > Rüdiger >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53? With r1898786 I would say yes. Regards Rüdiger

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:45 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > > Am 09.03.2022 um 14:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > >> > >> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to > >> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the

Re: backports

On 3/8/22 4:15 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 08.03.2022 um 14:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >> >>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >>> >>> >>> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build. >>> >>> Vastly simpler. >>> >> >> I agree w/ that... > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53? > Am 09.03.2022 um 14:44 schrieb Stefan Eissing : > > > >> Am 09.03.2022 um 14:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >>> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to >>> a bug in

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

> Am 09.03.2022 um 14:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to >> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem >> was already reported by me during

Re: backports

On 3/9/22 1:11 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >>> >>> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build. >>> >>> Vastly simpler. >> >> >> I agree w/ that... > > I for one

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > > - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to > a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem > was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the > changed three files

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

Am 09.03.2022 um 13:58 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 3/9/22 11:34 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 09.03.2022 um 08:37 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: You gcc 4.8 workaround for _Thread_local still looks good. Solaris builds and all unit tests not yet done but

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

On 3/9/22 11:34 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 09.03.2022 um 08:37 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: >> >> >> On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> You gcc 4.8 workaround for _Thread_local still looks good. >>> >>> Solaris builds and all unit tests not yet done but compiles fine for all my

Re: backports

> Am 09.03.2022 um 13:11 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >>> >>> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build. >>> >>> Vastly simpler. >> >> >> I agree w/ that... >

Re: backports

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> >> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build. >> >> Vastly simpler. > > > I agree w/ that... I for one prefer post processing of APLOGNO()s, if `make` started to

Re: backports

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:59 PM Graham Leggett wrote: > > Using Github/Travis should inform us on the status of a proposal. Good, so having it run on every branch is fine by you right? > > Github/Travis should definitely not be invited onto our PMC and given a veto > vote on backports and

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

Am 09.03.2022 um 08:37 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: You gcc 4.8 workaround for _Thread_local still looks good. Solaris builds and all unit tests not yet done but compiles fine for all my Linuxes. Thanks! Thanks for testing. I committed to trunk as

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as httpd-2.4.53

CANCELLED. Due to errors/warnings found during your tests, I cancel the vote on rc1. Thanks for giving us these feedbacks! I'll put up the rc2 vote as soon as we're ready. Thanks, Stefan > Am 09.03.2022 um 08:50 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >