On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 09:06, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:55:24AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Just to point out the obvious fact that hopefully everybody can agree with and
consider taking action on: More code review[er]s would be useful regardless
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:03, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I've updated the tools/release.sh script in the httpd-dist CVS
repository to make it easier for anyone to create HTTPD tarballs.
Before it was necessary for a tag to exist before a tarball could
be created. This made it very difficult to
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:15, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-1. I'm still of the mind that _every_ release should be recreatable.
Anything we put out there is going to be at least perceived as
official,
and we should take that into account.
Every release is tagged.
That's what I'm argueing.
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:36, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I've made some tarballs of the httpd-2.1 tree. I just pulled HEAD of
both httpd and apr (as of about an hour ago, just before greg's pollset
changes). They're here:
http://www.apache.org/~aaron/httpd-2.1.0-rc1/
Ok, I'll leave you to the RM
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:37, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:20:33PM -0800, Sander Striker wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:36, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I've made some tarballs of the httpd-2.1 tree. I just pulled HEAD of
both httpd and apr (as of about an hour ago, just before
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:12, Glenn wrote:
Ok, so Apache2 uptake is slower than desired for some (not all) on this
list. That's only logical given the success and therefore inertia to stay
with Apache 1.3. But there are more than a few other factors mentioned in
recent threads that are
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 03:00, Sami Tikka wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About re-opening 1.3 tree: I'm not sure I understand what is the big
deal. This is open source. You want to work on 1.3, go do it. Your
patches are not getting into ASF repository? Create your own. There are
other
Hi,
If someone has a bit of time, we've got a bunch of backports in the
STATUS file that already have 3 +1s which can be merged.
Sander
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:29, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Greg Stein wrote:
This is where process gets in the way of just doing the right thing.
Backport it for chrissakes.
amen.
The process requires getting 3 +1s. Anywhere (list, irc,
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 13:33, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
The process requires getting 3 +1s. Anywhere (list, irc, phonecall, STATUS) is
okay.
No, recorded +1s are okay, this brings it down to list and STATUS.
Ofcourse to summarize on list that there was support by X
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 07:44, Stas Bekman wrote:
I now know what the problem is. It is not a problem in httpd or its filters,
but mod_perl, allocated filter struct from the pool. With many bucket brigades
there were many filter invocations during the same request, resulting in
multiple
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 09:54, Stas Bekman wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 07:44, Stas Bekman wrote:
I now know what the problem is. It is not a problem in httpd or its filters,
but mod_perl, allocated filter struct from the pool. With many bucket brigades
there were
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 16:11, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
I ran into a snag(1) with Digest-Auth, mod_dav and dav_svn.
I understood from Sander that this was a known subrequest issue ? But have
not found any discussion Any pointers / message-ID's for me; I just need
to get it fixed and am
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 20:57, Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I propose that we should include this as a standard module.
+1 (concept)
Excellent, do I hear more?
Yes, +1 (concept). Actually, I'm in full agreement with Jeff on all
points ;).
Sander
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 19:52, Ben Laurie wrote:
I realise that having the value of getpid() and time() to hand is useful
for forensic purposes, but a getpid():time():next_id++ will result in
duplicates accross even small clusters.
Ah, I see :-) does mod_unique_id handle that?
/me sees a
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 13:32, Ben Laurie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2004/01/01 05:26:26
Log:
update license to 2004.
Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright doesn't. And, in any
case, the earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere.
We seem to have
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 03:48, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Looks like 21287 it is not a valid defect based on your explanation.
How do I rev back my changes?
Here is how you can see the patch:
cvs diff -u -r 1.102 -r 1.103 mod_mem_cache.c
revison numbers are from cvs.apache.org.
Verify the
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2004/01/19 03:32:59
Modified:.KEYS
Log:
No need to spam innocent people
I'd think that the spammers have picked up on the s/@/ at / trick by
now. I don't really see how this fixes things for these people.
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:41, André Malo wrote:
Anyone already working on switching to it?
I'm starting now with the code. Please speak up, if there's already work done.
AFAIK, noone is. Go for it.
Sander
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but
also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0.
In response to this, how do we feel about doing 2.0.49
aswell?
Sander
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:41, André Malo wrote:
Anyone already working on switching to it?
I'm starting now with the code. Please speak up, if there's already work done.
We need to take care of mod_mbox and mod_pop3 aswell.
Any takers? ;)
Sander
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:00 PM
And the notion of well, now it doesn't build on my platform is quite
suspect. The output of the process (run at buildconf time) is
build-outputs.mk. Just copy that from *anywhere* to your target platform.
We
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 19:59, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I hate to chime in here, but I must agree. Things have certainly
come a long way when the build/configure system tried to
be as LCD (lowest common denominator) as possible.
And it was a recursive make solution
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 19:50, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I am still confused as to what this all means. What do you all mean
by Platform. I keep reading these email messages and it sounds like
Platform == Linux. NetWare doesn't use buildconf but yet we still
have to generate the files. We also
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 23:19, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I ran the gen-build.py script to try to understand what it is doing.
I don't see how it would fit into the NetWare build process. The
NetWare build is completely independant from anything that happens in
mainstream build process.
The idea
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 00:15, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
I wasn't sure whether or not this EOC bucket type should go in APR-util
or httpd. Filtering gurus, what say ye? That bit looks OK to me
otherwise with a licence header added to the new file.
I say
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 07:07, Sung Kim wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:17, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Brian. W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:53 PM
I'm in the process of testing out the cvs2svn.py converter, and the
converter found
Hi,
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting the release cycle monday.
Thoughts?
Sander
From: Allan Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:38 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the msdev's head. please fix/revert.
-# ... /dll /incremental:no /debug /machine:I386
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:43 PM
At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
in the dsp
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:07, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting the release cycle Monday.
Thoughts?
+1
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 22:18, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:07, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 02:13, Sander Striker wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist is where the tarballs of RC 1 reside.
Please test and provide feedback.
Forgot to mention: the tagname is STRIKER_2_0_49_PRE1.
Sander
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc1 tarballs available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report your results to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance,
Sander
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 18:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc1 tarballs available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please report your results to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for release (AIX 5.1, AIX 5.2; no time for other platforms
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 04:21, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Mark Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FYI, I'll only speak for APR/Apache 2.0. 1.3 has a somewhat different
implementation.
Check out this further pool test,
[...]
apr_pool_create_ex(subp1, p, fun, NULL);
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are:
- BeOS specific MPM fixes
- Netware specific rand.c fixes
- Documentation update
- Berkeley DB detection fix on FreeBSD
Furthermore the rc1 tarball was
Hi,
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/.
Subversion had a 1.0 release februari 23rd (followed by a 1.0.1 release
yesterday). Binaries are available for various platforms. Given that
it
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 21:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/.
So when?
Can we get some lead time (7-10 days from the time
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 23:30, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
although we had already two or three runs for doing a 2.1.0 release, it still not
happened yet.
What I really cant understand is why; nobody expects a 'stable' release, those
asking for it are pretty much aware of the fact that 2.1
On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are:
- BeOS specific MPM fixes
On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 16:16, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
Yeah, I wasn't expecting that to go away, since there weren't any
BSD fixes to this effect. Jeff
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 11:52, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
[...]
And in bsd/os 5.1 we have
Syntax error on line 252 of /var/www/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so into server:
/usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so: Undefined PLT symbol
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
actually more portable than CVS, since I don't believe
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:29, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
TB
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:05, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:20, Ben Laurie wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:03, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:19, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
Can we please move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A lot of the points discussed aren't about technical problems of httpd
moving over, but overall topics concerning our
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 11:39, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:19 PM + Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c) You appear to be assuming daily snapshots maintained forever in your
story - if so, how do you deal with network problems and the
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I guess you didn't get around to do the -rc3 yet.
Actually, I did :)
You can find -rc3
Hi,
I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
I'm not likely to be able to track the list actively today,
so when you have verified the tarball to be correct, please
move it to www.apache.org/dist/httpd. (including the
CHANGES_2.0 file ;) )
Hereby my +1.
And a
From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
It compiles and seems to work (SunOS 5.8 sparc).
Just a minor side note
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 13:16, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
It compiles
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 19:08, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to test a SSL Proxy server using sslswamp, and I'm running into
the following segmentation fault !
There appears to be some missing error checks in the APR library - here's the
backtrace:
(Apache 2.0.48 -
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 19:41, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Well - there might as-well be a bug in httpd (I don't deny that)
But shouldn't APR protect itself against NULL pointers in allocator_free ?
And then what? abort()? Also note that this can only happen through
pool misuse (or a severe
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 20:01, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
[...]
Can you give a backtrace of where it does abort? And maybe the name
of the pool that is being checked (p pool-tag)? Have you stepped
through the code with gdb?
Sure.. here it is. There are 2 traces -
Let me know if you
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 02:47, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:30 PM 3/19/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
allocator
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 8:03 PM
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Apparently I'm not the only one suffering from the pool cleanup abortion
at the shutdown: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23238
Should Apache2
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 18:47, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:54 PM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that the apache-1.3 tree be migrated over
to subversion.
I'm +1 on it.
+1. -- justin
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:49, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have just tried to build a test tree of the most recent v2.0.50-dev, and it
broke like this:
config.c:1587: `FNM_PERIOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
Attempting to build against APR 1.0?
Hi,
Now that apache-1.3 is moving to SVN, how about moving httpd-2.x
as well?
Sander
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 23, 2004, at 4:01 PM, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:35:13AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
There's only one thing for us to decide; how to define the layout
under httpd/ in the SVN repository.
[...]
Fine here
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 20:52, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 23, 2004, at 4:01 PM, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:35:13AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
There's only one thing for us
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 16:15, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Jun 7, 2004, at 8:45 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Jun 6, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
FYI, Fitz did a conversion of apache-1.3, which is now located at
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 3:48 PM
Jeff Trawick wrote:
looks like 30-35 real fixes already in 2.0.50-dev and
another several
approved for backport, as well as a handful of enhancements
+1
Agreed. I'm willing to volunteer to do the
Hi,
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC1) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
Thanks!
Sander
From: Andre Schild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:53 PM
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 23.06.2004 21:13:10
I just commited a fix for this.
Bill
[...]
I didi take it, and now it compiles fine under win 2000.
The server runs well under win2000 and nt 4.0 server.
Hi,
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Sander
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Given the number of +1s I felt comfortable to move these.
The tarballs are now up at http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/,
so the mirrors can
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROOF-OF-CONCEPT?] logging memory used by an allocator
A couple of questions come up from an application perspective:
am I leaking memory? if so, on
Hi,
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
Hi,
I've tagged 2.0 as STRIKER_2_0_51_RC1. I'll roll a tarball
later on today for testing.
Sander
From: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:04 PM
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
How is this going?
[Anxiously awaiting 2.0.51 tarballs...]
Something got in the way
- Original Message -
From: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 06:32:12PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Something got in the way. I've got a round tuit reserved
Hi,
The tarballs for 2.1.0-rc1 (tag: STRIKER_2_1_0_RC1) are now located
at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Note that the 2.1 tarball does _not_ come prepackaged with APR, you will
have to get the 1.0 version of apr and apr-util seperately at:
Hi,
The tarballs for 2.0.51-rc2 (tag: STRIKER_2_0_51_RC2) are now located
at the usual location:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report any problems. Thanks!
Sander
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:19 PM
Did there is latest AJP/MOD_PROXY stuff in this one ?
Almost latest. I tagged it three days ago. Any changes after that
are not in there. I plan on rolling rc2 at my next free interval
which will include the
Hi,
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
Sander
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM
Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).
Sander
From: Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:34 AM
Hi,
The Original Proposal was in March of this year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10791831443r=2w=2
+1 Votes:
Tom May
Justin Erenkrantz
Andr Malo
Erik Abele
Jim Jagielski
Bill Stoddard
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:50 PM
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:20:49 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any reason why apr, apr-util, httpd mailing lists have
Reply-To header set to the sender and not to the list
Hi,
I did some mods to the site, highlighting all sessions about
httpd, but frankly, it looks totally messy. If someone with
a bright idea on how to make this look better wants to take
a stab at it, that would be much appreciated.
Sander
site.ac2004.patch
Description: Binary data
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Probably not worth it given all of the parallel development.
Well, I'd rather see us using something like this:
httpd/
apreq/
trunk/
branches/
tags/
+1
On 5/24/07, Niklas Edmundsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
tis 2007-05-22 klockan 11:40 +0200 skrev Niklas Edmundsson:
-8---
Does anybody see a problem with changing mod_cache to not update the
stored headers when the request has
On 7/31/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
However, if stuff is really depending on Date/Expires being what it
thinks it is (*shiver*) then I guess there won't be any other options...
Here's a
On 11/13/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added mod_serf in r594425:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=594425
Nice!
I've grown exceptionally... tired of looking at mod_proxy. mod_serf is
nice and tight at 440 lines or so.
A cool low number. Fits snugly with the
Hi,
I'm timing out on this one, but I thought I'd throw it in here in
case someone has a bright idea on what is actually going on...
First it doesn't seem to be the case that mod_proxy actually
sets r-status in the case of an error (service temporarily
unavailable caused by ProxyTimeout for
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/29/2005 02:11 AM, Sander Striker wrote:
[..cut..]
First it doesn't seem to be the case that mod_proxy actually
sets r-status in the case of an error (service temporarily
unavailable caused by ProxyTimeout for instance). This may
not matter for a handler
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 30, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Brian Pane wrote:
I haven't been able to find the bug yet. As a next step, I'll try using
valgrind on a build with pool debugging enabled.
On entry to allocator_free, if
(node == node-next node-index current_free_index)
is true,
Brian Akins wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Ok, let me tell you why I want it. I want to implement a directive
called CacheErrorServeStale, which, when it hits the CACHE_SAVE filter
say with a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable, and has a
cache-stale_handle,
continues as if it would have
Plüm wrote:
I think the SSL problem is caused by throwing away the conn_rec
entry for the backend and create a new one for each request.
That does not sound right, but I admit that keeping it must be
carefully examinated due to several possible issues. Two
that I can see immeditately are:
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bye bye welcome page
Joshua Slive wrote:
My opinion is that the shorter message is better because, by the fact
that it gives no
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 12:08, John Rowe wrote:
If I was a newbie, and I saw a page that says `it worked`, my immediate
reaction would be `what worked?` and I would start asking the exact
questions we`re trying to stop people from asking.
We can always go with simply displaying a
Hi,
I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN.
I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies,
etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page
for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the
sources from the SVN repository.
I'm
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 07:03, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN.
I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies,
etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page
for developers
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 09:34, Sander Striker wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 07:03, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Did this happen?
Some irresponsible partying is delaying the process a bit...
To clarify: I was planning on moving forward yesterday after
The Incredibles. I got
Hi all,
Justin and I have been up all night again working on the httpd-*
conversion. We've come to about 10% of loading the final dumpfile
and then we run into some issues.
We think we've sorted that out now and are restarting the load
(in a test repos). Loading takes quite a long time, so
1 - 100 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
