William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
.dsw+.dsp lets us provide everyone with a makefiles and Makefile.win that
works ***everywhere***. If you insist on a GUI, there is one extra step
for Visual Studio 2002 (.NET) - Visual Studio 2008 users. But would you
like that we provide you a Visual Studio
bing swen wrote:
As made clear sometime earlier, Windows 2008 R2 will only have 64-bit
versions. The clock is ticking
Has built fine (with edits) from command line without visual studio,
and .sln's won't be the sole mechanism as long as I have a veto;
1) MS needlessly introduces breaking
Also note that the x64 versions of windows do run 32-bit binaries without a
problem.
I've been providing x64 binaries of httpd 2.2 because people want them.
I've moved from running windows on my servers to running linux. Even an old
128mb, P3 800mhz will run linux + httpd without a hitch.
I also
Jorge Schrauwen wrote :
It would be awsome to have a build platform thats cross platform like
ant but for c(++) I'm not sure that exists though. Never look.
As I have mentioned before, the CMake project seems to be what is needed
in that situation, as this software, like autoconf, performs
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Also note that the x64 versions of windows do run 32-bit binaries
without a problem.
More bits is, of course, better but I agree that it does not always
make sense to run 64bits, even on a 64bits capable platform.
I've been providing
On Dec 19, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Marc Noirot wrote:
If such a thing would be done, what would be in your opinion a good
starting point in the Apache repository ? (2.3.0-alpha ? the current
2.2 branch ? trunk ?)
Trunk.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4
Marc Noirot wrote:
It has very few dependencies, and seems to be used by large projects,
notably KDE, and interestingly for the ASF, for the Windows build of PCRE.
The PCRE's CMakeLists.txt is IMHO a good starting point to understand
various points of interest for a powerful Windows build
Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote on 2008年12月17日, 19:07
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again it's
very picky in which platform you use.
Win XP x64 + VS2005/8 works best. Vista x64 is has some problems with
platform SDK (not sure they are fix now).
Looks like you haven't run cvtdsp.pl to convert the vc6 dsp's to once that
upgrade.
There is a more detailed explenation here:
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/x64
~Jorge
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008年12月18日 20:10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote on 2008年12月17日,
19:07
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again
it's
very picky in which platform you
IIRC there where problems with this. The update dsp doesn't compile clean on
vc6.
vc6 is still the compiler used for all office asf httpd binaries.
~Jorge
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008年12月18日 20:10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at
Bing Swen wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote on 2008年12月17日, 19:07
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again
it's
very picky in which platform you use.
Win XP x64 + VS2005/8 works best. Vista x64 is has some problems with
platform SDK (not
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
Bing Swen wrote:
There seems to be a bug in the project updating functions of VS2005/08:
embedded \ char's in the .rc files always made a fatal error to the
resource compiler (rc.exe), e.g.,
... LONG_NAME=Apache HTTP Server ...
If all the inner \
bing swen wrote:
So is it a good idea to maintain two sets of project files to cope with this
problem: one for the old VS 5/6 .dsp files (no more x64 support), and one for
VS 2005/08 .vcproj files (with direct x64 support)?
No, it's a horrid idea.
It's a good idea to drop to one
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
bing swen wrote:
So is it a good idea to maintain two sets of project files
to cope with this problem: one for the old VS 5/6 .dsp files
(no more x64 support), and one for VS 2005/08 .vcproj
files (with direct x64 support)?
No, it's a horrid idea.
Sorry for
Bing Swen wrote:
Sorry for this. Since 2+ years have passed (since httpd-2.2.2, the last
Win-x64 compilable version), I thought of some progress even at the cost
of such complexity.
Bing; in all fairness, 2.2.2 was the first version robust on windows, and
didn't yet build clean on x64.
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm,
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has passed.
I will copy the release files to the dist
On 12/14/2008 04:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has
On Dec 14, 2008, at 8:01 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Done in r726455 and r726456. Bill was so kind to fix another file
that I missed
in r726473.
Do we have a checklist for this?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Sander Temme wrote:
Do we have a checklist for this?
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/ httpd-site
grep -r 2\.2\.10 httpd-site | grep -v /\.svn/
or x.y.z-1 always has worked for me. Of course /docs/ should all be
generated from /xdocs/ but blind faith isn't wise (the
On 12/14/2008 06:05 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sander Temme wrote:
Do we have a checklist for this?
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/ httpd-site
grep -r 2\.2\.10 httpd-site | grep -v /\.svn/
or x.y.z-1 always has worked for me. Of course /docs/ should all
On 12/06/2008 05:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
I now declare this vote closed.
Thank you all for testing and taking part in the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1, tested on Ubuntu 8 (kernel 2.6.24).
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
On Dec 6, 2008 11:30am, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1
built with Sun Studio Express and tested lightly on OpenSolaris 2008.11
On 12/06/2008 05:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Summarizing the vote so far it looks quite promising.
It would be cool if we would
On Dec 6, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 on Solaris 10/sparc
SunOS sunsys 5.10 Generic_127127-11 sun4u sparc
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Summarizing the vote so far it looks quite promising.
It would be cool if we would have a Windows source bundle
to give the Windows guys a chance to test.
Are there any scripts that can be used to prepare this?
If not can Bill (sorry you are the first one that comes to
+1 vanilla on 2000, XP and Vista
I have details but cannot get that mail through at the moment so I'll
break it into pieces, if that's ok.
Gregg
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 here, a flawless build.
-win32-src, .msi's and -symbols are all in /dev/dist waiting
to catch up with the
On 12/10/2008 08:34 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 here, a flawless build.
-win32-src, .msi's and
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
+1
Tested on:
* tfm32 Server
* tfm64 Server
Regards,
Mihai Moldovanu
On Dec 6, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 Darwin x86
+1 FreeBSD 7-STABLE x86
+1 NetBSD 3.1
S.
Details:
Tested with PHP 5.2.7.
Good signatures and hashes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dist $ gpg --verify httpd-2.2.11.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made
On 12/6/2008 at 9:30 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ruediger
Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
+1 NetWare
Custom compile on Gentoo (x86) +1
~Jorge
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Res [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+1
Tested on the following environments:
Solaris 8 SPARC
Solaris 9 SPARC
Solaris 10 SPARC
Red Hat AS 4 32 Bit (x86)
Red Hat AS 4 64 Bit
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 , tested on EC2 with Ubuntu and Redhat :-)
--
Colm
2008/12/6 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
builds/runs (default config) on OSX 10.5.5
--
Michal Grzedzicki
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
Den Saturday 06 December 2008 17:30:05 skrev Ruediger Pluem:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
It builds fine on Mandriva.
--
Regards // Oden
When will you close the vote?
On Dec 6, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Regards
Rüdiger
Builds on Ubuntu 8.10.
Best Regards.
--
Cafer Şimşek
http://cafer.org/
On 12/06/2008 07:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
When will you close the vote?
Sorry for missing this point. I plan to close it
on December 13th, 12:00 UTC.
That should give everybody enough time for testing and voting.
If not please let me know and will adjust the timing
Furthermore I can prepare
On 12/06/2008 05:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1
Tested on the following environments:
Solaris 8 SPARC
Solaris 9 SPARC
Solaris 10
44 matches
Mail list logo
