Also all is fine with building against APR 1.2.7.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 19:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Done.
I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts
You mean this Friday or next?
Alpha
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Intend-to-tag-2.2.1-on-Friday-t1359442.html#a3866575
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Alpha Huang wrote:
You mean this Friday or next?
It's come and gone, I didn't see the RM actually release 2.2.1... folks
are rapidly fixing various additional bugs in 2.2 to make it stable for yet
another 2.2.2 tag and roll.
A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alpha Huang wrote: You mean this Friday or next?It's come and gone, I didn't see the RM actually release 2.2.1...folksare rapidly fixing various additional bugs in 2.2 to make it stable for yetanother
2.2.2 tag and roll.-- ~Jorge
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:47:22PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our
flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre community, and liasoning back
our changes to pcre to it's project?
I would expect that anybody who commits local changes to
Done. I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts working now. Also no build error apu_version anymore. All tests passed here, including mod_perl and other common mods.
Steffen http://www.apachelounge.comYeah it builds fine with APR and APR-util trunk, nothing was needed
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box, no aditianal SDK's)
FWIW, I'm focused on the Win64 fixes on trunk, backporting compatible
changes to 2.2, and ignoring 2.0 for Win64.
Of course you don't need any SDK's - they are included. For VS 6.0 users
their
-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:55
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box, no aditianal SDK's)
FWIW, I'm focused on the Win64 fixes on trunk
Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply totaled if trying as Win64.Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...I noted that i didn't have any SDK's installed because if you use the free edition of
VC.net 2005 you need Platform
was copied in whole from a working 2.2.0 install
Steffen- Original Message -From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:55Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine.
The report is:
error c005 at 6FD0F220 (mod_ssl).
c005 is 'access violation'.
Using FileMon, this appears to get triggered when trying to read in a
server
Joost de Heer wrote:
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine.
The report is:
error c005 at 6FD0F220 (mod_ssl).
c005 is 'access violation'.
Using FileMon, this appears to get triggered when trying to
; this is observed under
darwin x686 and win64. so don't necessarily expect 2.2.1 to build win64
clean yet out of the zip, and it may be a few more cycles before every
issuees is resolved.
It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our
flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre
-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 21:44
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Joost de Heer wrote:
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine
On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO. Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed underdarwin x686 and win64.so don't necessarily expect
2.2.1 to build win64clean yet out
...Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed underdarwin x686 and win64.so don't necessarily expect 2.2.1 to build win64clean yet out of the zip, and it may be a few more cycles before every
issuees is resolved.It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring ourflavor
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My thought is reroll aprutil, which i'll do tonight. The problem isn't
with httpd; the problem's with the maintenance on two platforms, and that's
what the release notes/CHANGES will say.
Updated CHANGES. I'm also looking at the Win64 patch for apr-util before I
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 05:17
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts
Steffen wrote:
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
This is apparent in my test case.
Slowing things down in the debugger - the flaw goes away, which is to say
some blocking logic isn't blocking, probably an attribute of some recent
minor refactoring
PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 18:07
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
This is apparent in my test case.
Slowing things down in the debugger - the flaw goes away, which
. Comments on that
list are welcome.
Bill
Original Message
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA]
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:15:55 -0500
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrowe rowe-clan.net
To: dev apr.apache.org
My gut says let's push to the trunk code for readwrite.c
On 4/1/2006 at 12:28 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd
On 4/3/2006 at 8:54:29 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/2006 at 12:28 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
This is fixed on APR 0.9 / 1.2 branches and 1.3 trunk.
Brad's fixed this on 1.2 branch and 1.3
So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
If so, that's not a very compelling tarball for those needing to support
Windows.
If 2.2.1 is being labeled as non-GA already then that's quite
appropriate, move on to 2.2.2 as soon as possible
Jess Holle wrote:
So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
Correct, but the 2.2.2 tarball will build on windows (with a bumped aprutil).
That's why I think the concensus, between borked Win32/Netware and a missing
proxy patch, is to reroll
On 2.2.0 (APR 1.2.2) it works ok.
Using the same conf with 2.2.1 it gives the error, even the
standard printenv.pl is the cgi-bin gives the error.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 05
On 04/02/2006 02:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237view=rev has not
been
backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(.
So I am now -1.
Should I propose r379237 for backport?
++1 ! :)
Proposed for
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows? Is this desired?
Regards
Rüdiger
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows?
I
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
So I guess this part of the code should be conditional and only active
either on non windows (BTW
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:17:00PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
That's allowed I think
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows? Is this desired?
IMHO - this was an outright Win32-specific
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:17:00PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
That's
FWIW, mod_python (from subversion) passes all tests with the Apache
2.2.1
release candidate on Mac OS X 10.4.
Previously the test_global_lock test failed with Apache 2.2.0 because
of a
bug in the APR library on Mac OS X. Apache 2.2.1 has newer version of
APR library which fixes problem
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1.tar.gz
Thanks,
Paul
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 11:28:15AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
m Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
+1, passes all tests on ubuntu.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh
+1: OS X 10.4.5 (gcc4 and gcc3)
+1: Solaris 8 (gcc3)
Passes all perl-framework tests
On Apr 1, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 11:28:15AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
Tests ok on Solaris 10 (U2-beta, sunstudio)
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
Subject: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1.tar.gz
lördagen den 1 april 2006 21.28 skrev Paul Querna:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613
On 04/01/2006 09:28 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
+1, compiled and started on
RHAS 3 update 3, gcc 3.2.3, glibc 2.3.2, kernel 2.4.21
RHAS 4 update
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
On 04/01/2006 11:24 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/ssl/proxy.t
söndagen den 2 april 2006 00.32 skrev Ruediger Pluem:
On 04/01/2006 11:24 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
: Sunday, April 02, 2006 00:29
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make
21:28
Subject: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
It looks like this is because
Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
=46ailed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
=2D=
=2D-
t/ssl/proxy.t 172 58 33.72% 3
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237view=rev has not
been
backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(.
So I am now -1.
Should I propose r379237 for backport?
++1 ! :)
--
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts with shebang line are not working on win32, get permature
end of script headers error.
Steffen, please clarify, is this a regression from 2.2.0 w/ APR 1.2.2?
What's your ScriptInterpreterSource say?
Bill
Paul Querna wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Outch
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
VC++ 2005 (plus msdev.exe) from the command line (makefile.win); OpenSSL
0.98a, manual manifest embedding.
main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
referenced in function _show_compile_settings
Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Error
onsdagen den 29 mars 2006 03.59 skrev Paul Querna:
I plan on tagging 2.2.1 from the 2.2.x branch on Friday evening, and
start the whole release cycle thing.
Cool. And the new apr 1.2.5 too?
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mandriva: http://www.mandriva.com
NUX: http://li.nux.se
On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:15 pm, Oden Eriksson said:
Cool. And the new apr 1.2.5 too?
APR v1.2.6 has already been released.
http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/Announcement1.2.html
Regards,
Graham
--
Paul Querna wrote:
I plan on tagging 2.2.1 from the 2.2.x branch on Friday evening, and
start the whole release cycle thing.
-Paul
There are some proposed proxy backports that are lacking one additional
+1 to be folded in. Would be nice to have those in 2.2.1
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are some proposed proxy backports that are lacking one additional
+1 to be folded in. Would be nice to have those in 2.2.1 :)
+1 to that.
Can I vote? Which patches do I need to vote on?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
onsdagen den 29 mars 2006 15.20 skrev Graham Leggett:
On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:15 pm, Oden Eriksson said:
Cool. And the new apr 1.2.5 too?
APR v1.2.6 has already been released.
http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/Announcement1.2.html
Thanks. I discovered that minutes after posting. Sorry for
I plan on tagging 2.2.1 from the 2.2.x branch on Friday evening, and
start the whole release cycle thing.
-Paul
Hello.
I just wondered to know when you plan to release apache-2.2.1+?
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mandriva: http://www.mandriva.com
NUX: http://li.nux.se
About to do a deployment and I'd rather use 2.2.1 than my patched 2.2.0
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Brian Akins wrote:
About to do a deployment and I'd rather use 2.2.1 than my patched 2.2.0
I would be happy to RM it, two issues:
1) APR/APR-Util release. Lots of good fixes in the 1.2.x branches. We
should do a release over there first.
2) Are people happy with the status of the proxy
Paul Querna wrote:
2) Are people happy with the status of the proxy issues in 2.2.x? I
honestly haven't kept up with those threads.
I am particularly interested in the reverse proxy and keep-alives issues
that were floating around. I use a patched 2.2.0, but I'd like to have
something
Paul Querna wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
About to do a deployment and I'd rather use 2.2.1 than my patched 2.2.0
I would be happy to RM it, two issues:
2) Are people happy with the status of the proxy issues in 2.2.x? I
honestly haven't kept up with those threads.
I think
On Friday 13 January 2006 07:30, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm offering to RM this package late friday or sometime Saturday if
there's no serious objection. Fixing or not fixing partial page results
is obviously
Backport of ajp Cookie2 fix from HEAD.
*
Just looking at STATUS, there's a fix:
* HTTP: If a connection aborts while waiting for a chunked line,
flag the connection as errored out.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=354630view=rev
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1: jerenkrantz, jim, wrowe
Looking at that,
I would have liked to do it, but there's no way I
could volunteer for this weekend (a few family things
popped up with my Dad in the hospital and my
Uncle/Godfather passing away)... But my comments
about 2.2.1 are:
1. I think the proxy fixes should be part of 2.2.1,
but I think
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-13 13:39:14]:
To follow that up, I went to mail-archives to look for the
message-ID (I don't keep a private archive of this list), but I
don't find a search facility. What am I missing?
The SoC project httpd-mbox-search did not succeed. I did not get any
bashing-upon.
Part of the Win32 binaries issue is that the -src.zip still required too much
tweaking to be called the official version, by the time i'd finished build/test
I'd had to make too many other 'minor tweaks'. I'd feel much warmer releasing
2.2.1 as binaries on Win32, as the build system
and is only undergoing some extra
bashing-upon.
I'd like the partial page fix to be in 2.2.1 if possible.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
been agreed upon, committed and is only undergoing some extra
bashing-upon.
I think the following thing from the backport list must be solved in 2.2.1
(maybe with different patch if the one proposed is not ok):
- mod_cache: Fix PR38017 (mod_cache not working in reverse proxy setup
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm offering to RM this package late friday or sometime Saturday if there's
no serious objection. Fixing or not fixing partial page results is
obviously
Backport of ajp Cookie2 fix from HEAD.
* mod_proxy: Fix Cookie2 header problems that originates back
72 matches
Mail list logo
