Re: Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > So using m2eclipse is the preferred way to deal with jackrabbit (subversion) > and eclipse. If I use m2eclipse is necessary to run "mvn eclipse:eclipse" ? No. The "mvn eclipse:eclipse" way creates a normal Eclipse java project from the pom(s) th

Re: Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > So using m2eclipse is the preferred way to deal with jackrabbit (subversion) Just personal preference, both tools works WELL. > and eclipse. If I use m2eclipse is necessary to run "mvn eclipse:eclipse" ? No necessary to run this command any more

Re: Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

So using m2eclipse is the preferred way to deal with jackrabbit (subversion) and eclipse. If I use m2eclipse is necessary to run "mvn eclipse:eclipse" ? I'm not sure of this. Actually I'm not using the eclipse plugin so working in the old-fashioned way, but it is working fine (more or less) On Mo

Re: Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

The article should still works, because it follow Michael's instruction. Just noticed it's quite old: August 15, 2007. I did a try for m2eclipse recently and it give much better experience than it's early version. It has a GUI to manage your pom (You don't need to check the pom model manual any mo

Re: Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

I've some problems developing with jackrabbit in Eclipse. Where can I find some info about this? There are many ways to do this, but I'm pretty happy with the m2eclipse plugin from http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/. The plugin installs cleanly from the update site at http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/

Using Eclipse for Jackrabbit development (Was: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?)

Hi, On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I've some problems developing with jackrabbit in Eclipse. Where can I find > some info about this? There are many ways to do this, but I'm pretty happy with the m2eclipse plugin from http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/. The plugin installs clea

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

This article is very clear about it: http://www.jroller.com/cdaniluk/entry/setting_up_an_eclipse_multi I will try this instructions. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I've some problems developing with jackrabbit in Eclipse. Where can I find > some info about this? The "prob

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

I've some problems developing with jackrabbit in Eclipse. Where can I find some info about this? The "problem" is due maven2 modules and Eclipse project mapping. I have spend some time searching in Google with little luck. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Ju

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I will try to send the patch in a couple of days. Thanks! There's no pressing need for the 1.6 release, so I don't mind waiting a bit longer before cutting the release candidate. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

I will try to send the patch in a couple of days. El 10 de jul de 2009, 4:03 p.m., "Jukka Zitting" escribió: Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > When is planned the 1.6 release... I was thinking of cutting the release candidate now over the weekend. :-) That would make the

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > When is planned the 1.6 release? I was thinking of cutting the release candidate now over the weekend. :-) That would make the release happen next week unless any issues come up before that. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

When is planned the 1.6 release? El 10 de jul de 2009, 2:45 p.m., "Jukka Zitting" escribió: Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I see a subversion branch c... Yes, that's what we'll be using for the 1.6 release and possibly 1.7 after that (only if needed). BR, Jukka Zitti

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I see a subversion branch called "1.x". Is this what I have to download and > test the patch? Yes, that's what we'll be using for the 1.6 release and possibly 1.7 after that (only if needed). BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

I see a subversion branch called "1.x". Is this what I have to download and test the patch? On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > Ok, I will download 1.6.0 and will try the patch. Once included the patch I > can contribute with an migration utilty (perhaps to the sandbox) > > > On

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

Ok, I will download 1.6.0 and will try the patch. Once included the patch I can contribute with an migration utilty (perhaps to the sandbox) On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > > I wonder if the patch JCR-1972 is go

Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I wonder if the patch JCR-1972 is going to be included in a near release, > because I have to update it to match a recent jackrabbit-core version. I like the idea so I think it would be good to have it included, perhaps already in 1.6.0. C

Is JCR-1972 going to be included?

I wonder if the patch JCR-1972 is going to be included in a near release, because I have to update it to match a recent jackrabbit-core version. -- Paco Avila GIT Consultors tel: +34 971 498310 fax: +34 971496189 e-mail: pav...@git.es http://www.git.es