Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

2006-11-23 Thread Edgar Poce
On 11/23/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, On 11/23/06, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com . > We'd be happy contribute that to jackrabbit if everybody thinks > that this would make sense. Generally, I think that mo

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

2006-11-23 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/23/06, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com . We'd be happy contribute that to jackrabbit if everybody thinks that this would make sense. Generally, I think that most of the other web-ui features that we package into CRX cou

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

2006-11-23 Thread David Nuescheler
Hi guys, since we ship our CRX product packaged as a .war file for quite a while we built some helpers to allow us to have the JCR explorer, WebDAV and a couple of other features packaged into a single webapp. You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com . We'd be happy contribute that

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-22 Thread Jukka Zitting
hi, On 11/22/06, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 02:22 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Note however that we can (and should) map the login/synchronization > filter to just the JSP pages and servlets that need access to the JCR > session - there's no need to synchroni

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-22 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 02:22 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Yes. A JCR Session is not necessarily thread-safe even for read-only > access. So unless we want to introduce a session pool, we need to > block all simultaneous requests within a HTTP session. Note however > that we can (and should) map

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Wolf Benz
a of a contrib project is great. As JCR is a rising star, this will be a very much appreciated addition. What value have all these data if you can't make it smile in a screen? Buy, Wolf -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/web-based-jcr-browser-contribution-tf2

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Angela Schreiber
Jukka Zitting wrote: I think it would make sense to target combining the navigator and perhaps also the ntdoc tools together with the current jackrabbit-server webapp. That would make for a pretty nice all-in-one deployment package for Jackrabbit. if we move all subprojects of the jcr-server o

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, I think it would make sense to target combining the navigator and perhaps also the ntdoc tools together with the current jackrabbit-server webapp. That would make for a pretty nice all-in-one deployment package for Jackrabbit. I'm not sure how well Maven 2 handles merging of full webapp depe

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi jukka On 11/20/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it would make sense to target combining the navigator and perhaps also the ntdoc tools together with the current jackrabbit-server webapp. That would make for a pretty nice all-in-one deployment package for Jackrabbit. The

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
this will be a very much appreciated addition. What value have all these data if you can't make it smile in a screen? Buy, Wolf -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/web-based-jcr-browser-contribution-tf2551645.html#a7442691 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My question was more about the eventual plan for the navigator app than making immediate decisions. Let's revisit the issue later. In a mid term plan I think we could include both the navigator and the webdav server in a single webapp. If it'

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/20/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The jackrabbit server is already integrated in the navigator Ah, nice! Should we target at eventually merging the two webapps, or is it better to keep them separate? Btw, sharing the jcr session between the webdav servlets and the navig

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: probably dreaming from here :), but in a not so long term it would be great to have a single war that includes the webdav server, the jcr navigator, a jackrabbit monitoring tool (to monitor the internals), and some kind of audit trail app th

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 21:02 -0300, Edgar Poce wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you think about storing the jcr session in the servlet session > > > and use a requestlistener to synchronize the access to the jcr session?. > > > On each request a l

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Should we target at eventually merging the two webapps, or is it better to keep them separate? IMHO it's better to keep them separated, when the navigator is mature enough to join to the jackrabbit release cycle we could review it. > Btw,

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi, On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you think about storing the jcr session in the servlet session > and use a requestlistener to synchronize the access to the jcr session?. > On each request a lock would be acquired on the jcr session and released > only when the

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi Frans, On 11/21/06, Frans Thamura @ FB - Meruvian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i did try JCR Explorer, i never can use it, anyone can share? I'm not sure whether you are refering to building the project from the source or to access the demo. There's a demo at http://edgarpoce.dyndns.org:808

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we target at eventually merging the two webapps, or is it > > better to keep them separate? > > IMHO it's better to keep them

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with associating the JCR session with the HTTP session is > that the servlet container may allow multiple concurrent request > within the same session. yes. It was an issue

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we target at eventually merging the two webapps, or is it > better to keep them separate? IMHO it's better to keep them separated, when the navigator is mature enough to join to

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 11/22/06, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you think about storing the jcr session in the servlet session > > > and use a requestlistener to synchronize the access to the jcr session?. > > > On each request a lo

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-01 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi, On 11/1/06, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1 Nov 2006, at 11:45, Edgar Poce wrote: > Hi, > > I started to work in a web based jcr browser It's just a work in > progress but it seems to be fully functional to navigate jcr contents > with read only operations. Very nice! I thin

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-01 Thread Tako Schotanus
Looks very nice, if you can get it all to work I can stop working on mine ;-) What I have now is ugly and not very user-friendly at all although it does allow you to add whatever nodes you want (no support for multi-values and ordered nodes yet though). In fact it was when I was working on the n

Re: web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-01 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 1 Nov 2006, at 11:45, Edgar Poce wrote: Hi, I started to work in a web based jcr browser It's just a work in progress but it seems to be fully functional to navigate jcr contents with read only operations. Very nice! I think the correct term here would rather be ajax browser though ;)

web based jcr browser contribution

2006-11-01 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi, I started to work in a web based jcr browser It's just a work in progress but it seems to be fully functional to navigate jcr contents with read only operations. A demo of the browser is available at http://edgarpoce.dyndns.org:8080/jcr-browser/ btw, the only item that works in the menu is "