Correct, the ConfigMBean, and config update command support
bypassStorage option.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 07:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I thought so top. I even remember a bypassStorage option ...
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
I'll start by saying that I was
I thought so top. I even remember a bypassStorage option ...
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
> I'll start by saying that I was under the impression that long ago it was
> the default behavior.
> If not +1 to the idea, but I would prefer it as on option to the existing
>
I'm more to create a Jira in Pax-Url to improve pax-url-wrap.
We can cut off a release quickly and fix that.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 07:02 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
I started having a look at why our trunk looks more like a barrel instead
of karaf :-)
Among others, I noticed that the versi
+1
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 05:19 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
The felix config admin service handles the persistence of a config pid
to a file in etc nicely if the file is already exists but it does not
allow the creation of the file.
So I think it could make sense to have a command like:
c
The felix config admin service handles the persistence of a config pid
to a file in etc nicely if the file is already exists but it does not
allow the creation of the file.
So I think it could make sense to have a command like:
config:save org.ops4j.pax.web
It would create the org.ops4j.pax.we
Thanks JB.
Updated patches have been added to KARAF-1753.
Best Regards,
Scott ES
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Thanks Scott,
>
> I will review and apply the patch.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/12/2012 03:30 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to m
Thanks Scott,
I will review and apply the patch.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 03:30 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Makes sense to me. They still have a number of issues that they are
working to include in 1.8.x. I will add a note in the Javadoc stating what
version is currently supported.
I
Makes sense to me. They still have a number of issues that they are
working to include in 1.8.x. I will add a note in the Javadoc stating what
version is currently supported.
I am uploading a new patch to KARAF-1753 today. It will take the place of
the one currently attached to the ticket. It
Oh, got it Scott.
IMHO, I would prefer to stay with Felix DS 1.6.0. As we are going to
release 2.3.0 very soon, we can ship SNAPSHOT.
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 03:22 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Thanks for the response. Bad question on my part.
Better question is are we going to wait u
Thanks for the response. Bad question on my part.
Better question is are we going to wait until all the functionality that is
to be included in Karaf 2.3 that is dependent on the corresponding Felix
projects to get updated? Felix DS (SCR) with support for OSGi 4.3/DS Spec
1.2 (Felix DS 1.8.0-SNA
Hi Scott,
Karaf 2.3 already uses OSGi r4.3 (and corresponding framework).
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 02:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
Hi All,
What was the final outcome on this? Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based on
OSGi 4.3?
Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What was the final outcome on this? Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based on
> OSGi 4.3?
>
Karaf 2.3.x is laready using OSGi 4.3
>
> Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to the Felix
> DS 1.8.0-S
Hi All,
What was the final outcome on this? Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based on
OSGi 4.3?
Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to the Felix
DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT which has the 4.3 support in it.
Best Regards,
Scott ES
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
No problem, sorry to replied on the mailing list (I was on road ;)).
Thanks!
Regards
JB
On 09/12/2012 09:25 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
as mentioned and excused for on IRC, I hit "i" over the wrong
window... Assigned it back to you directly afterwards
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012
as mentioned and excused for on IRC, I hit "i" over the wrong
window... Assigned it back to you directly afterwards
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
> Please I started to work on it.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.o
Please I started to work on it.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: "Andreas Pieber (JIRA)"
To:
Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (KARAF-1588) Import EIK in eclipse
Date: Wed, Sep 12, 2012 8:43
16 matches
Mail list logo
