Hi,
I'm sorry to be a PITA :)
What I've read so far has been feelings, one concern of perception by "big"
customers.
I would really like to know, which problem we are trying to solve by moving
the pax projects under the umbrella of Karaf.
Or what I personally would favor under their own tlp of
Personally, I would love to see this change and the other people in my
organization liked the proposal as well.
- Eric L
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Some of you already pinged me to share concerns about PAX projects
> governance. I think it's my
On 24/02/2022 16:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Achim
Just wanted to share concerns I received. Basically, PAX projects are
"free fields", without strong guarantee in the release (not formal
staging/vote/review).
It doesn't mean we don't do that, it's just not strongly enforced;)
Hello,
Hi Jean, hello ops4j participants.
Given recent rush hours with log4j issues I can understand some of the
concerns. However, looking at practical aspects, these issues were
handled as good as they would be at the ASF. Time it took Grzegorz to
release updated pax-logging was pretty short.
If
Hi Achim
Just wanted to share concerns I received. Basically, PAX projects are
"free fields", without strong guarantee in the release (not formal
staging/vote/review).
It doesn't mean we don't do that, it's just not strongly enforced ;)
I don't mean we *have to* do it, I'm just sharing comments
Hi JB,
Before I come to any conclusion, I would really like to understand what
kind of issue/problem you would like to solve with this, which is easier to
solve under an apache umbrella.
thanks, Achim
Am Do., 24. Feb. 2022 um 15:04 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi
I am not sure if concerns about PAX projects are fully justified, simply
because they are being released and still worked on. While team of
people working on it have shrunk over time, I haven't had any troubles
with them for long time.
The contribution regulation is not an issue. It does work
Hi guys,
Some of you already pinged me to share concerns about PAX projects
governance. I think it's my duty to share these concerns and discuss
possible actions.
Apache Karaf is one of the biggest consumers of PAX projects.
However, PAX projects use a "self own" designed governance:
- for
Hello
I'd like to announce the release of 4 Pax Logging versions with two version
updates:
- SLF4J 1.7.36 (not much affecting Pax Logging - just a version update)
- Reload4J 1.2.19 (aligning to latest upstream version) in 1.11.15 and
2.0.16 (the 1.12.x and 2.1.x branches do not contain
