Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.10

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 3:09:11 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > ＋1 (binding) > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On 2015-2-4, at 上午8:45, Jamie G. wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We resolved 10 issues in this releas

Re: Karaf 4.0 switch to Java8?

I'm not so sure that I like the idea of removing the support for a JDK Version between two minor release. If we keep 7 for 4.0 we should keep it for the entire 4xer line. Especially since the industry does not move as fast as we do... Kind regards, Andreas On Mon Jan 26 2015 at 7:08:52 PM Jean-Ba

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 3.0.3

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:46:56 AM Christoph Gritschenberger < christoph.gritschenber...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > kind regards, > Christoph > > On 28/01/15 02:01, Jamie G. wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We resolved 97 issues in this release: > > http://s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 3.0.1 release

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu Jan 22 2015 at 6:35:22 PM Jamie G. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 01/19/2015 02:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 2.3.4 release

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu Jan 22 2015 at 6:28:39 PM Jamie G. wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 01/19/2015 06:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.4.1

+1 (binding) kind regards, and a happy new year! Andreas On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 4:57:38 PM Achim Nierbeck wrote: > +1 (binding) > > regards, and happy new year :-) > > Achim > > 2014-12-31 7:15 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 12/31/2014

Re: [RESULT][PROPOSAL] Karaf Decanter monitoring

Hey JB, Thank you very much for the update! I'm already thrilled about that one :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 7:17:04 PM Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi JB, > > awesome. Thanks for the feedback :-) > > regards, Achim > > 2014-11-14 16:40 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Hi g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.9

Basically +1; builds and runs fine. Just a curious question, but shouldn't be the notice file located in apache-karaf-2.3.9 the same as the one in apache-karaf-2.3.9/src? Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Create/donate Apache Karaf Decanter subproject

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > following the discussion about Karaf Decanter, I would like to submit a > formal vote. > > The purpose is to be able to create the resources (especially the git > repo) to move forward and easily

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 4.0.0.M1 technology preview.

+1 On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > 2014-10-11 23:10 GMT+02:00 Jamie G. : > > > Hi, > > > > We have 327 issues resolved on our way towards Apache Karaf 4.0.0 GA > > release. This is a technology preview, as such there will be features > > and other functionality

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 3.0.2

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On Oct 10, 2014 9:34 PM, "Jamie G." wrote: > Hi, > > We resolved 215 issues in this release: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-3.0.2-release.page?view=markup > > Dependency changes can be reviewed here: > > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.8

+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 (binding) > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On 2014-9-16, at 下午3:56, Jamie G. wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We resolved 9 issues in this release: > > > http://svn.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.7

builds and tests as it should. Distribution looks good and does what it should do. +1 (binding). Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak < krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Looks good for me > > Best regards > Krzysztof > > On 03.09.2014

Re: Board Report for September 2014

Hey, +1 too from my side. Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi JB, > > looks good to me. > +1 > > regards, Achim > > > > 2014-08-27 16:32 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Hi all, > > > > I prepared the Board Report for September 2014: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.6

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Christian > > Am 29.07.2014 04:39, schrieb Jamie G.: > > Hi, >> >> We resolved 70 issues in this release: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/site

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Karaf 2.4.0

Nothing to add; +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Now that Aries releases are done, I'd like to discuss a 2.4.0 release asap. > I think it's in a good shape, but i'll do a bit more testing and I would > welcome any additional volunteers. > > Anyw

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cave 3.0.0 release

Builds, tests and looks fine => +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I submit the Apache Karaf Cave 3.0.0 release to your vote. > > This is a major new release of Cave, the first purpose is to fully work on > Karaf 3.0.x. > > We re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.5

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 04/10/2014 06:45 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We resolved 34 issues in this release: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/ >> webap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 3.0.1

* Build and tests run clean using jdk7. * Artifacts looks fine. * Notice files look fine. +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > We resolved 145 issues in this release: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/commun

Fwd: Karaf & Java8

I really think that we should create a 3.1 branch soon again (directly before Gulliaumes commits), since 4.0 is simply too far in the future and new features on micro releases are not following the semvers specification. Kind regards, Andreas -- Forwarded message -- From: Jean-Bap

Re: [HEADS UP] Huge commits on master

I don't see a problem with simply turning up the version number on the master and branching off before Guillaumes commit and keeping the version there. Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Master currently is at 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, we'd need to branch that chec

Re: Board report for March 2014

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On 5 Mar 2014 15:39, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > Hi all, > > I prepared the board report for March 2014: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports > > Please, review and keep me posted asap. I would like to submit it today. > > Regards > JB >

Re: [PROPOSAL] karaf-maven-plugin changes

I'm with Christoph on this one. I think people wont like us too much for changing things during minor releases. Maybe we could print a deprecation comment if the original commands are used instead of the new ones helping the users switch. Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.3.4

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Did some simple tests on windows and linux. CXF and camel also seem to > install fine. > The zips and tar.gz seem to be complete and license also look

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cave 2.3.0 release

+1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 (binding) > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On 2014-1-12, at 上午1:32, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I submit the first rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 3.0.0

Compiling either the tag or the source archive works like a charm. Tested with various use cases which also did what they should. +1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > +1 non binding. Will be nice to see this one go out :-) Great job guys! > O

Re: Git Push Summary

Is it really happening? :-) I must dreaming! On 20 Dec 2013 22:18, wrote: > Updated Tags: refs/tags/karaf-3.0.0 [created] b72aadca5 >

Re: Error while building Karaf trunk

do u use maven 3.1.x? If yes pls try to downgrade to 3.0.x Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > try a complete mvn clean install, it should build the plugin first. > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/19/2013 03:33 AM, Harsh Kumar wrote: > >> Hi,

Re: itests (trunk) on Mac osx (now with Java 7)

Seams to be probem in RMI remoting. In [1] you find the exception. In [2] you see a bug which might be connected to it. I only did a VERY short googling. But this seams to be kind of the problem. Kind regards, Andreas [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/tags/karaf-2.3.0/tooling/exam/contain

Re: A Blueprint Free Karaf

down minimal and switch to scr) > > > > The question I wonder about is which version to put that in. I don't > > really see that as a minor change, so I'm tempted to push that into 3.0, > > but if we do, it will delay it even more. > > > > >

Re: A Blueprint Free Karaf

Even for the a bit fuller one I think. Why should the karaf core need a dependency on blueprint? Kind regards, Andreas PS: for a real adaption to karaf I would rather consider this for the 3.x or 4.x line... On 5 Dec 2013 06:40, "Achim Nierbeck" wrote: > yeah, I already did grab myself a copy o

Re: A Blueprint Free Karaf

I'm with David on this one. I would even have no problems if the minimal distribution would really look like your fork. The only problem is that forking isn't just the best way to maintain a project :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Great idea! I

Re: Board Report for December, 2013

Looks good to me too; +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I prepared the Board Report for December, 2013: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports > > Please review it. > > I will update the report with t

Re: Versioning of command apis

For the API externalisation: +1; BUT really externalized. Which means only in a different project. Otherwise it could get quite interesting if e.g. we need to release something differently in the 2.x branches. For the second point I'm completely with JB (-1) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Nov 14

Re: Build failure on Karaf trunk...

3.1.x does not work by now. Since the karaf plugin does not use the abstraction layer this terribly fails with the new maven version --> 3.0.x should work Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:37 PM, David Bosschaert < david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was actually using the defa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 2.3.2 release

+1 (binding) kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > +1 (binding) > > regards, Achim > > > 2013/10/13 Christian Schneider > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Christian > > > > Am 11.10.2013 19:39, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > > > > Hi all, > >> > >> I subm

Re: Null Pointer in comand dynamic-import

not by definition, but an issue with the version where to apply your patch and the error message would be fine independently. Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:39 PM, nseb wrote: > I must create an issue ? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble

Re: Board Report for September 2013

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On Sep 1, 2013 10:01 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" wrote: > hi , > > +1, looks good to me. > > regards, Achim > > > 2013/9/1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > Hi all, > > > > I prepared the Board Report for September 2013: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/KARAF/**Board

Problems with new maven version

Hey guys, I've kind of a problem with KARAF-2395 [1]. While I've a patch making everything compatible to maven 3.1.x it's incompatible then to maven 3.0.x. Thanks to the way we're using aether the only real option I see is to either set the minimum maven version to 3.1 or provide two commands; one

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

+1 :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :) > > Cheers, > Łukasz Dywicki > -- > l...@code-house.org > Twitter: ldywicki > Blog: http://dywicki.pl > Code-House - http://code-house.org > > Wiadomość napi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.2

Did it worked on 2.3.1? Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:00 PM, semethyjr wrote: > I tried adding war and webconsole features to featuresBoot. I get the > following exception thrown in karaf.log on start up. Running on RHEL 6.4. > > org.apache.karaf.features.cfg > > featuresBo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.2

finally the build works :-) +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > We resolved 67 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC > promotion): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.2 (second try)

ropped the staged RC and removed the tags. > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote: > > > I'll try to run without build failing on test failures. Lets see if I can > > discover any more failures. > > > > Kind regards, > > Andre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.2 (second try)

the release candidate requires minus one. While this > rc kit is still up are there any other test failures any one is observing > on other platforms? > > On Friday, July 5, 2013, Andreas Pieber wrote: > > > This is kind of a PITA :-( While building the tag works without any > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.3.2 (second try)

This is kind of a PITA :-( While building the tag works without any problems the source download still doesn't work. And this is the artifact we've to vote on I'm afraid. On Linux the following tests fail: Failed tests: testOneFileWordCounts(org.apache.karaf.shell.commands.WcTest): A single file r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.3.2

--**--** >> >> [INFO] Reactor Summary: >> [INFO] >> [INFO] Apache Karaf ..** SUCCESS >> [1.672s] >> [INFO] Apache Karaf :: Util .......... SUCCESS >> [2.067s]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.3.2

.672s] > > [INFO] Apache Karaf :: Util .. SUCCESS > [2.067s] > > [INFO] Apache Karaf :: Main .. FAILURE > > [27.834s] > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Andreas Pieber > wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release - Appassembler Maven Plugin version 1.4

wrong mailing list? :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hello all, > > > I'd like release version 1.4 of the appassembler-maven-plugin which > contains > new features and bug fixes > > The Application Assembler Plugin is a Maven plugin for generating sc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.3.2

Am I the only one receiving the following result on downloading the -src.tar.gz file and running mvn clean install? I get the same error using java 6 and java 7: --- T E S T S --- Running org.a

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

hey, there is no 0 option :-) still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and especially getting the changes back) so much easier... Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > to follow the discussion that we had some we

Re: Concern about new feature in blue-print core ( ie blueprint-core-1.1.1-SNAPSHOT is now blueprint-1.2-SNAPSHOT )

Hey Dan, Basically not a bad idea, but you should rather ask this question on the aries list instead of the karaf one. Not all ppl having a word in this are on both lists. Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARI

Re: Debug pax-exam unit test

is it possible that intellij has troubles with two debug processes at the same time? try to run the tests regularly and attach the remote debugger. Does this do the trick? Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Charles Moulliard wrote: > Even if I use this option, I cannot atta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.6 release

OK, build works; notice file looks fine and samples are working. +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.6 release to your vote. > > Release Notes: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/karaf/cellar/tags

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 2.3.0 release

build works, basic exmaples work and the notice file also looks fine to me. +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 05/19/2013 08:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Apache Karaf

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.11

I built the code, and run some of my projects on it. Looks pretty good! +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > The repository URL link should be to > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-146/ > > -Jamie > > On Saturday, April 2

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf 2.2.x release branch status.

+1 from my side too. Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (just give me a hour this afternoon to check Jira). > > Regards > JB > > > On 04/26/2013 01:45 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We'd like to schedule a Karaf 2.2.x patch update rel

Re: Help testing in Karaf 2.3.1

One remark to the testing thing: the problem is that most of the packaging thing is not under the control of us but rather exam itself. Some of the most active exam maintainers are not listening on this list --> ops4j might be a good resource too. Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9

Re: Help testing in Karaf 2.3.1

Hey, a) is it possible that you've missed the relevant methods in your question? b) I think the user list might have been the better place to ask, but anyhow: c) IIRC your entire test bundles is deployed into the container, so e.g. a blueprint file from the correct location ( src/test/resources/OS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 3.0.0.RC1

I also second Jamie on this one. +1 for the RC1 "tech preview" release. Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Hi, > > I'm with Jamie here, we're longing for this RC now for quite some time and > actually I'm personally quite happy that we did get some im

Re: [Discuss] Karaf and Pax Exam 3.x

t Karaf support in Pax > >> Exam, and in my role of Pax Exam Project Lead, I would like to bring up > >> this subject to the Karaf team, hoping to set up a roadmap for making > >> Karaf work with Pax Exam 3.x. > >> > >> Some background: > >>

Re: [Discuss] Let Hudson comment on jira issues

fine with me too. Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Filippo Balicchia wrote: > I'm agree too, > as already Łukasz mentioned it can improve the quality code. > > Regards > > --Filippo > > 2013/3/11 Achim Nierbeck > > > fine with me. > > > > regards, Achim > > > > > > 2013/3

Re: Problems with karaf documentation

Am 04.03.2013 05:06, schrieb Andreas Pieber: > > >> - It should be possible to link directly to a certain feature. So the >>> documentation should be available in separate pages per feature >>> >>> I'm not quite sure how this should look like. I think

Re: Problems with karaf documentation

Hey, On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > > I would like to offer the web documentation in a layout with the following > goals: > - Links should be as stable as possible, so google as well as other > websites can link to us > - Google should lin

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf website with scm-publish

Sounds like not all of us have permissions to push the site? Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried the goal: > mvn clean install scm-publish:publish-scm > > However I keep getting: > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf version 2.3.1

+1 for recutting On 28 Feb 2013 21:15, "Achim Nierbeck" wrote: > +1 to get the release train rolling again :-) > > Regards, Achim > > sent from mobile device > Am 28.02.2013 21:12 schrieb "Jamie G." : > > > I'd like to re-cut the 2.3.1 RC then seeing as we have resolved the > > recent minimal dis

Re: Board report for March, 2013

+1 kind regards, Andreas On 28 Feb 2013 19:17, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > Hi all, > > as I will be in vacation tonight for one week (with probably a "limited" > Internet connection, and my wife will watch me ;)), I have anticipated the > Karaf board report, to give you the maximum of time to

Re: New Karaf features on github

;> 3rd party enterprise libraries which other users could use in their >> projects. >> >> I don't know whether all eterprise libraries fulfill the rules to be >> dependencies of Apache project. If no, It could be only a Github project. >> >> Regards >

Re: Idea: Allow users to patch feature files

I have to admit one thing: all of those ideas (as summed up nicely by Ioannis) sound VERY tempting. They would solve some of the problems we're facing in production and would definitely help many people. BUT I'm definitely with Guillaume. This feels like we're opening the gates to Hell introducing

Re: New Karaf features on github

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Tcharl wrote: > Hi, where to push, may I clone Karaf? > Exactly. There's a github mirror at https://github.com/apache/karaf. You can clone this one and provide pull requests as you're used to. We'll get notified about them on the dev list. Some additional comme

Re: pax url 1.5.2 release

no objections from my point of view; do you have all required permissions? Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Andrei Pozolotin < andrei.pozolo...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Hello* > > if there are not objections, I will cut pax url 1.5.2 release today > http://team.ops

Re: blueprint annotations?

The last time I've given this a shot (~6 month ago) the annotations were by far not sufficient to get everything required done; have you checked? Is it possible in the meantime? Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andrei Pozolotin < andrei.pozolo...@gmail.com> wrote: > *H

Re: karaf-maven-plugin ci-build-profile failures

It seams so; Do you have a fix for this? (@Brian any idea?) Jamie, JB, or someone else with permissions to our Jenkins instance; we might want to include the profile for our integration runs? :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: > I presume this p

Re: [UPDATE] Karaf branches and features in Karaf 2.3.x

nothing to add; +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:33 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > following a discussion started a couple of weeks ago, just an update about > Karaf branches and releases: > > - karaf-2.x: I'm going to create this branch asap (let say tonight or > tomorrow). This br

Re: Karaf 2.3.x and Karaf 3.0.x support ASM in Version 4.1, why?

an binds the version to [3.1, > 4.0). Now Pax-Web 3.0.0.M2 will be usable with Karaf 3.0 again :-) > > regards, Achim > > > 2013/1/22 Andreas Pieber > >> Outsch, I just set the release date of Karaf 3 in my private Calendar >> to 2014... :-) >> >> Kind

Re: Karaf 2.3.x and Karaf 3.0.x support ASM in Version 4.1, why?

Outsch, I just set the release date of Karaf 3 in my private Calendar to 2014... :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > looks like this issue at xbean is going to block aries and pax-web > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-230 > > regards, Ac

Re: svn commit: r1436343 - in /karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/deployer: blueprint/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/deployer/blueprint/ features/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/deployer/features/ spring/src/m

just my 0.02€ but maybe we don't want to duplicate the same code thrice? :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:41 PM, wrote: > Author: gnodet > Date: Mon Jan 21 13:41:10 2013 > New Revision: 1436343 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1436343&view=rev > Log: > [KARAF-2134] D

Re: [PROPOSAL] Karaf release policy and branches

I think so too. If we ONLY backport real bugs and nothing else it would be quite minimal imho. Let the branches grow as needed :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Jan 16, 2013 6:09 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > 2.2.10 is a kind of particular, because it should have been a minor > release (and not

Re: [DISCUSS] Switching to Git

l request and code review tools / workflow; > > will new karaf git repo provide these? > > Original Message > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Switching to Git > From: Andreas Pieber > To: Apache Karaf > Date: Thu 17 Jan 2013 09:26:07 AM CST >> BUT all git rep

Re: [DISCUSS] Switching to Git

BUT all git repos will still be mirrored to github. So you can pull them however you like. Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think the repo would be hosted on github. > > Btw, if you have any issue to access the github, try the blog[1] h

Re: [DISCUSS] Switching to Git

I'm using git on 98% of my projects and using git-svn on all asf projects; thanks to git-svn and the good mirror system of the ASF in fact I don't really care. I would use git that and that way :-) +0 Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > The ASF suppo

Re: Create Karaf 2.4.x branch

Actually I would even prefer Achims proposal. Since we almost always add new features this would make the transition ways more logical. Maybe we should also combine this with timed released (2 months?). Micros are only bug-fix backports and we can cut those as required. Kind regards, Andreas On T

Re: Create Karaf 2.4.x branch

maybe the solution should rather be increasing the speed of the minor releases; as long as we keep to semver.org I don't see any problems by it. Kind regards, Andreas On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > +1 on creating a 2.4 branch. > Personally I am ok at adding new featur

Create Karaf 2.4.x branch

Hey Guys, I would like to commit Karaf-1563 [1] to the 2.x line; but the only branch available now is 2.3.x; while I know that a common argument now will be that we should rather focus on 3.x I simply don't like the idea to apply new features to micro releases. Those should always be stable and ne

Re: Text editing in the Karaf console

Definitely a BIG +1. I've done some quick editing with your patch, karaf and the editor and I must admit I REALLY like it. Although not perfect it would have been so incredible useful to have such a tool in the runtime environment from time to time I'm strongly +1 to simply include it as it and enh

Re: [Discuss] Apache Karaf 2.3.1 RC in two weeks time?

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On Jan 8, 2013 6:17 PM, "Jamie G." wrote: > Hi All, > > First off, happy new year to the community, secondly, I'd like to > schedule Apache Karaf 2.3.1 RC for two weeks time from now. > > We have a lot of resolved issues at the moment, and several issues in > progress. I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf EIK 0.9.0 release

Built/Test and give it a short look; Legal things (NOTICE; ...) seams to be in place too. Artifacts are valid too. +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/04/2013 09:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>

Re: Clean karaf.data/cache or karaf.data (KARAF-1563)

wrote: > The option descriptions are the same for "clean", and "clean cache". > Aside from that, the patch works great. > > kind regards, > christoph > > On 02/01/13 10:28, Andreas Pieber wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I've attached a

Re: Text editing in the Karaf console

well, in that case I think a github project might be the best solution. Independently we can still include it in trunk as a reference then (which would still have my +1).. Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > I am not sure if having it as part of the

Clean karaf.data/cache or karaf.data (KARAF-1563)

Hey guys, I've attached a patch to [1]. Basically what it enables you is to either delete your entire data folder on every reboot (or only the cache directory). In addition the same options had been added to the restart command. Finally the same option is also possible "one-time" by putting a clea

Re: Text editing in the Karaf console

TBH I would neither have a problem putting this directly on trunk. +1 from my side. Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Ioannis, > > it could be awesome to have a kind of vi in Karaf shell ;) > > It could be very interesting to mix your text e

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf version 2.2.10

Hey, You've forgotten me ;-) Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > The vote has passed with the following result : > > +1 (binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Freeman Fang, Achim Nierbeck, > Ioannis Canellos and Jamie Goodyear. > +1 (non binding): Ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf version 2.2.10

build & tests run fine; license/notice looks fine; signatures are OK; build artifacts work OK with my tests. BUT looking at the release notes I still think that we should finally adopt to semver ;-) +1 (binding) Kind regards, Andreas On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > +

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release planning

Nothing to add; I like the plans :-) +1 to 0.9 and +1 to get Karaf out ASAP Aries is done. Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > 1) 0.9.0 makes sense to me, +1 > > 2) +1, I'd like to add a 2.2.10 release to the list as well. > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Mon, D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.5 (3rd try)

I'm sorry, tested and checked at the morning already. Looks good to me. +1 Kind regards, Andreas On Dec 3, 2012 9:09 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > I propose to extend as this release looks OK and we had votes on the two > first tries. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/03/2012 07:29 PM, Jamie G.

Re: Text editing in the Karaf console

@Ioannis: That's a really great idea! You'll definitely have my Kudos for that :-) @Guillaume: Why unix specifc? You've e.g. edit in windows (as Ioannis noticed). @JB Executing native commands could be kind of dangerous. For example, just because Karaf need some permissions to modify /etc/xyz you

Re: Board report for December, 2012

+1; nothing to add from my point of view Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I prepared the board report for December, 2012: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/KARAF/**Board+Reports

Re: RFC on proposal to allow hooks into Karaf shutdown

99) would do the job. WDYT? Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > In the same line i also like to see this > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1180 but not sure how to > implement it > > -D > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:24 PM,

Re: RFC on proposal to allow hooks into Karaf shutdown

Short answer: why not :-) Longer answer: I've though about it for some time now (since you provided this proposal on the user list) but I cannot really come up with a counter argument speaking against this. So, from my point of view it's definitely worth giving this a shot! Kind regards, Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.5

+1 source build with tests work, signatures are ok. Simple samples work too. Looks good to me. Kind regards, Andreas On Nov 26, 2012 11:05 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: > Hi all, > > We solved 27 issues in this release that you can find in the RELEASE-NOTES: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/**a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.5

+1 Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > +1 > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Twitter: iocanel > *

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >