Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Hi, Yes, you can hit the CAS server at Heroku. Notice it's a Heroku free server so it needs to be re-activated first (it takes a couple of seconds). So for a UI test, you should first hit it, wait 30 seconds and then perform the test. Just my 2 cents: Using automated UI tests was my first strateg

Re: [DISCUSS] Preparing for 0.8.0 Release

Unfortunately, I forgot to list the [1] thread that is in the JIRA for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641. This is where it was proposed that we defer the pac4j work to 0.8.0. Sorry for any confusion. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:13 PM, larry mccay wrote: > All - > > I would like to bot

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-519) Prompt user to provide password, rather providing as an argument to knoxcli cmd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15083741#comment-15083741 ] Larry McCay commented on KNOX-519: -- This has inadvertantly not made it into 0.7.0. We need

Re: Sample Hadoop test using HDFS and MiniKDC

+1 on adding secure tests! What functionality do we want to test as part of this suite initially? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Kevin Minder wrote: > Hey Everyone, > I ran across this test in Hadoop the other day. > > https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/2f623fb8cc3dc49221216c3b46b6f5114481

Re: [DISCUSS] Preparing for 0.8.0 Release

Larry, thanks for volunteering to manage the next release. The feature set and release date both sound terrific to me. I think the community will greatly benefit from quick releases that have meaty features. +1 Sumit. On 1/5/16, 3:13 PM, "larry mccay" wrote: >All - > >I would like to both vol

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

From my perspective it would be ideal if there were some automatable functional tests for this. I’m not advocating that these be something included in “mvn clean install” as that is running too long as it is. Given that I don’t have as much context as Larry, I have some questions about what th

[DISCUSS] Preparing for 0.8.0 Release

All - I would like to both volunteer as release manager and start identifying the target features for an 0.8.0 release. As has been discussed on the [1] thread, the driving feature should be the inclusion of the incoming pac4j federation provider and some key authentication mechanisms: * CAS * O

Sample Hadoop test using HDFS and MiniKDC

Hey Everyone, I ran across this test in Hadoop the other day. https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/2f623fb8cc3dc49221216c3b46b6f51144811904/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/qjournal/TestSecureNNWithQJM.java I was thinking it could be the bases for a secure funct

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Okay, very good. I've used TestShib for the picketlink provider - thanks for the pointers! On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Jérôme LELEU wrote: > The online CAS server (https://casserverpac4j.herokuapp.com/login) uses > the > CAS protocol. SAML support can be tested using some online IdP like Okt

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

The online CAS server (https://casserverpac4j.herokuapp.com/login) uses the CAS protocol. SAML support can be tested using some online IdP like Okta, TestShib, OpenFeide, Ssocircle... 2016-01-05 17:32 GMT+01:00 larry mccay : > Great - thanks for that pointer! > > I will take a look at that and h

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-537) Linux PAM Authentication Provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15083364#comment-15083364 ] Jeffrey E Rodriguez commented on KNOX-537: --- Hi Kevin. Yes sorry for the delay Af

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-537) Linux PAM Authentication Provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15083338#comment-15083338 ] Kevin Minder commented on KNOX-537: --- [~jeffreyr97] < Are you still planning on providing a

[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-589) Jericho java.lang.IllegalStateException: StreamedText position 10773 has been discarded

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15083335#comment-15083335 ] Jeffrey E Rodriguez commented on KNOX-589: --- After proper review and if the patch

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Great - thanks for that pointer! I will take a look at that and help drive the release related testing. Merge testing will be gated on CAS server (is this SAML or CAS protocol?) and testBasicAuth. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Jérôme LELEU wrote: > Hi, > > Glad to hear back from you! > > The

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Hi, Glad to hear back from you! The core pac4j project is fully tested by unit tests (and some integration tests I run for major version), then all pac4j implementations are each tested by the appropriate demo: j2e-pac4j-demo tests j2e-pac4j, spring-webmvc-pac4j-demo tests spring-webmvc-pac4j, et

[jira] [Assigned] (KNOX-589) Jericho java.lang.IllegalStateException: StreamedText position 10773 has been discarded

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sumit Gupta reassigned KNOX-589: Assignee: Sumit Gupta > Jericho java.lang.IllegalStateException: StreamedText position 10773 has been

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Hello Jérôme - Happy New Year! I am going to start reviewing your updates today, hopefully. I was thinking that we need to start discussions on what the key usecases are and how to go about testing them. We can certainly test the testBasicAuth and against the hosted CAS server but what about FB,

Re: pac4j and Apache Knox

Hi, Happy new year! A few days ago, I updated my patch of the pac4j gateway provider according to all comments on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641 as well as the documentation on KNOX-642. Is everything ok for the merge? Thanks. Best regards, Jérôme 2015-12-14 15:28 GMT+01:00 la