Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
On 29 févr. 08, at 12:50, Aijin Kim wrote: Hi Dick, I don't have much experience with OmegaT. I think it's the best way to ask community's help on this. :) Hi all, Some strings of po files have a line which was added to make each msgid string be unique using --duplicates=msgid_comment

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
Hi all, Some strings of po files have a line which was added to make each msgid string be unique using --duplicates=msgid_comment option during executing oo2po. http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/toolkit/ duplicates_duplicatestyle How can OmegaT or poedit handle the added line? Since the

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Ain Vagula
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Jean-Christophe Helary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29 févr. 08, at 12:50, Aijin Kim wrote: Hi Dick, I don't have much experience with OmegaT. I think it's the best way to ask community's help on this. :) Hi all, Some strings of po files have a

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Aijin Kim
Hi JC, I guess what Ain mentioned was that 'msgctxt' option during oo2po saves the comment line in another field rather that adding to msgid fileld. Then there won't be no change with msgid string. So for current po files, do you simply ignore the comment line in your translation? Thanks,

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Aijin Kim
Hi Ain, Thanks for you comment. Do you know if Poedit or OmegaT support msgctxt? Aijin Ain Vagula wrote: Since the string is a msgid it is handled as a source string and is displayed as translatable. ... thats one reason we switched to msgctxt comment style, where identifier is

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Cor Nouws
Dick Groskamp wrote: [...] AFAIK most Dutch translators use OmegaT but otherwise we have to make some kind of switch It's far from something I'm specialized in, but the last time I made a contribution, I used Pootling (0.2.0). Maybe that dóes make a difference? Pls. send me something to

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Ain Vagula
Poedit supports from 1.3.8, dont know about OmegaT. ain On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Aijin Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ain, Thanks for you comment. Do you know if Poedit or OmegaT support msgctxt? Aijin Ain Vagula wrote: Since the string is a msgid it is handled as a

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
On 29 févr. 08, at 15:20, Aijin Kim wrote: Hi JC, I guess what Ain mentioned was that 'msgctxt' option during oo2po saves the comment line in another field rather that adding to msgid fileld. Then there won't be no change with msgid string. So for current po files, do you simply ignore

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: problem strings in OmegaT

2008-02-28 Thread Aijin Kim
Hi JC, Thanks a lot for your kind explanation. So you mean that you manually delete the msgid_comment part from each target string? If so, it should be better that source string doesn't include the msgid_comment line in source string to avoid additional work, right? Now, I'm thinking if we