+1 for Eike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
+1 for Eike
-- Nakata Maho ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for Eike!
+1 for Eike.
Thanks,
khirano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
Thanks very much for your participation and also generous gestures and
professionalism showed in the discussion.
So far, the consensus among the participants are like the following in
my understanding:
- ESC and L10N-Dev of OpenOffice.org support the idea of joining the
Unicod
Hi Michael,
As I see Charles himself is supporting Eike in this role.
I am sorry I have not had a chance to be fully acquainted with Eike's
experience in the fields you have mentioned.
So in that case, and since Charles no longer seems to be willing to
volunteer, Eike has my support.
And no, it
Hi Aiet,
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 19:10 +0400, Aiet Kolkhi wrote:
> I would not say this liaison role is specifically a technical one.
Strange, my concern was based on the description from Ienup of the
liason role (which seems to differ from your analysis):
> Ienup wrote:
>> The role of the
Aiet,
Le 28 mars 08 à 16:10, Aiet Kolkhi a écrit :
Hi,
like I mentioned earlier, I have been a Unicode member for some time
and
followed the developments in the consortium as well as public
mailing lists
even longer.
I would not say this liaison role is specifically a technical one.
In m
Hi,
like I mentioned earlier, I have been a Unicode member for some time and
followed the developments in the consortium as well as public mailing lists
even longer.
I would not say this liaison role is specifically a technical one. In my
opinion, it is more related to standards, alphabets and lan
+1 for Eike!
Charles.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28.3.2008, at 15:10, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Eike Rathke wrote:
I previously thought that once involved it might actually mean
that one
has to spend some significant amount of time on it, and as I don't
have
much time to spend therefore didn't jump in. However, this somehow
seems
not to
Eike Rathke wrote:
I previously thought that once involved it might actually mean that one
has to spend some significant amount of time on it, and as I don't have
much time to spend therefore didn't jump in. However, this somehow seems
not to be the case from the comments I heard so far. If a few
Hi,
As people Cc'ed me with [EMAIL PROTECTED] I previously sent the following mail
with
that account to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list as well that I'm not
subscribed to with, so it may eventually pop up later when moderated
through, sorry for duplicates, I'm resending herewith with my
subscr
Hi,
Eike has a strong technical background in i18n and is our contact to the
ICU folks too.
+1 for Eike.
Regards,
Dieter
Matthias Huetsch wrote:
Hi Ienup,
I actually agree with Pavel here; this liaison member probably deserves
an engineering candidate. I also agree that either Eike or Karl
Hi,
Le 28 mars 08 à 12:14, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 22:27 +0100, Pavel Janík wrote:
Lets wait with the decision please... I'd like to hear at least
coni's opinion and of course I'd like to see better candidates from
the dev. community. Karl? Eike? You are actually doing t
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 22:27 +0100, Pavel Janík wrote:
> Lets wait with the decision please... I'd like to hear at least
> coni's opinion and of course I'd like to see better candidates from
> the dev. community. Karl? Eike? You are actually doing this stuff in
> OOo...
Agreed, this
15 matches
Mail list logo
