Aiet,
Le 28 mars 08 à 16:10, Aiet Kolkhi a écrit :
Hi,
like I mentioned earlier, I have been a Unicode member for some time
and
followed the developments in the consortium as well as public
mailing lists
even longer.
I would not say this liaison role is specifically a technical one.
In my
opinion, it is more related to standards, alphabets and language /
l10n
policy.
No offense to Eike of course, — his brilliant work over the years
deserves
so much respect — I just think Charles or someone with good
experience with
standards and representation of FLOSS products throughout various
bodies
and organizations would be a bit more suited for this specific role.
The consortium already has permanent representations as full members
from
big names like Adobe, Apple, Google, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle.
Even Sun is
a full member with a right to vote on technical committees.
And this is another reason why I would be happy to see a liaison being
fully equipped and experienced to represent the entire .org community.
Besides, the public mailing list is also open for anyone for all
technical
discussions.
This is my personal opinion of course and given all that, I still
support
Charles in this role.
This is very nice of you and I am very grateful for this opinion. I
don't really wish to create difficulties here. Eike is very much the
best person for this job, and that's the most important thing. Some
people just have a problem with me, and I'm fine with that. That's how
life is :-) .
Best,
Charles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
