[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165965#comment-13165965
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3606:
---
Committed to trunk revision: 1212292
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3606-hideMethodAgain.patch
Patch that hides an accidently visible method In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13165984#comment-13165984
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3606:
---
I will post a patch later adding the neede
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166002#comment-13166002
]
Ukyo Virgden commented on SOLR-2836:
Steven, It's been a while since I've checked, I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166003#comment-13166003
]
Ukyo Virgden commented on SOLR-2835:
Agreed.
> Compilation problem wit
Cut Norms over to IndexDocValues
Key: LUCENE-3628
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3628
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/index, core/search
Affect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3606-deprecations3x.patch
Here a patch that deprecates the removed methods
Hide storage details for IndexDocValues inside the codec
Key: LUCENE-3629
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3629
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3620.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk through merge of LUCENE-3606.
> Filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166042#comment-13166042
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-1499:
-
{quote}
Regarding the thread saf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166047#comment-13166047
]
Luca Cavanna commented on SOLR-1499:
bq. I see the ThreadedEntityProcessorWrapper#nextR
MultiReader and ParallelReader accidently override doOpenIfChanged(boolean
readOnly) with doOpenIfChanged(boolean doClone)
--
Key: LUCENE-3630
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3606-deprecations3x.patch
Updated patch, some javadoc changes (deprecated m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2880:
-
Attachment: current.patch
The attached patch removes the numShards property from the collection node. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2880:
-
Attachment: (was: current.patch)
> Investigate adding an overseer that can assign shards, later do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2880:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2880.patch
The correct patch.
> Investigate adding an overseer that can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-1499:
Attachment: SOLR-1499-3x.patch
Patch looks good. Made some minor changes:
* Removed
Remove write access from SegmentReader and possibly move to separate class or
IndexWriter/BufferedDeletes/...
-
Key: LUCENE-3631
URL: https://issues.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166113#comment-13166113
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-2386:
Doesn't it related to
http://lucene.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-1499:
Attachment: SOLR-1499-trunk.patch
Patch for trunk.
> SolrEntityProc
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11727/
3 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDuelingCodecs.testEquals
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.(FST.java:2
I'm looking into this: this test doesn't use that many documents...
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11727/
>
> 3 tests failed.
> REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDuelingCodecs.testEquals
>
> E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166138#comment-13166138
]
Luca Cavanna commented on SOLR-566:
---
I'm working on a new handler called CheckIndexHandler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen resolved SOLR-1499.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk and 3x.
> SolrEntityProcesso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen resolved SOLR-2955.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Committed to tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2481:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2481.patch
updated the patch so that it applies to current trunk.
> Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166192#comment-13166192
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2880:
---
Committed. Thanks Sami!
> Investiga
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166241#comment-13166241
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
robert, while you are on it I think we
If we needed a more validation of the work done:
Update: Stack Overflow and all our other sites have been running 2.9.4 for
> a few days now, no issues that we're aware of, and saw a slight memory drop
> in our usage.
http://codeclimber.net.nz/archive/2011/12/02/Lucene-net-2-9-4-is-out-now-with-N
Awesome - great work everyone
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Simone Chiaretta
Sent: 12/9/2011 7:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Update from StackOverflow team
If we needed a more validation of the work done:
Update: Stack Overflow and all our oth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166289#comment-13166289
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
Does that really remove the confusion? Not sur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166290#comment-13166290
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
I think it does: we need to use the simplest n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166296#comment-13166296
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3622:
---
I agree with Robert and Simon, we should h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166296#comment-13166296
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3622 at 12/9/11 4:46 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166303#comment-13166303
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
Its two different points:
1. Does it remove t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166305#comment-13166305
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3622:
--
+! To the function naming being comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166306#comment-13166306
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
And as I said, calling it IndexDocValues doesn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166310#comment-13166310
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
bq. I think it does: we need to use the simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166311#comment-13166311
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
bq. And as I said, calling it IndexDoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166312#comment-13166312
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
For now in the branch
(https://svn.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166315#comment-13166315
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
bq. we had some arguments when merging from th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166319#comment-13166319
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
{quote}
I'd also have argued that in 4 we shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166327#comment-13166327
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3622:
---
+1 for FunctionValues
> s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166328#comment-13166328
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-
+1
> separate IndexDocValues
LukeRequestHandler: getFieldFlagsKey is out of sync with getFieldFlags
--
Key: SOLR-2956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2956
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
SolrEntityProcessor prematurely ending when performing doQuery()
Key: SOLR-2958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Com
collection URLs in a cluster
Key: SOLR-2957
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2957
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
In solrcloud, one can hit a URL of /collect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3606-deprecations3x.patch
Final patch including changes.txt. Will commit th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166355#comment-13166355
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3606:
---
Committed 3.x revision: 1212539
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166361#comment-13166361
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2957:
Lookup core name directy as is done now.
If it's n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3606.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Merged changes to trunk revision: 1212545
This issue is now finished, tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3606:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.6
> Make IndexReader really read-only in Lucene 4.0
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166366#comment-13166366
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3606 at 12/9/11 5:58 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166399#comment-13166399
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
I finally got a chance to do some testing in produ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166401#comment-13166401
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2958:
-
Does this affect the code commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166407#comment-13166407
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
Some additional info: The index is composed of six
+1 to release.
I ran my usual smoke test: indexing and searching first 100K Wikipedia
docs, OS X 10.6.8, Java 1.6.0_22, Python 2.6.1.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> There were some issues again with rc2.
> Thank you all for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166433#comment-13166433
]
Andrew Gunther commented on SOLR-2958:
--
Our solr source tree is 3.2 although the probl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166432#comment-13166432
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3627:
Awesome, thanks Ken!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166462#comment-13166462
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2920:
David: thanks for the updated, reading the diff something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-1972:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1972-branch3x-url_pattern.patch
Attaching a branch_3x version of Eric's latest patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-2958:
Attachment: SOLR-2958.patch
I tried to reproduce the bug, but I didn't run into the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166635#comment-13166635
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2920:
Those params weren't used at all -- dead code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166645#comment-13166645
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2880:
---
just saw this random fail
{quote}[junit] Testca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166655#comment-13166655
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1730:
---
Just noticed the expected exception is not ignored i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166679#comment-13166679
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2880:
---
just got another:
{quote}[junit] Testsuite: org.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166710#comment-13166710
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2880:
---
I raised the max iterations timeout for the first fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166739#comment-13166739
]
Andrew Gunther commented on SOLR-2958:
--
my mistake as I was comparing to a non-trunk v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Gunther closed SOLR-2958.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.6
trunk patch of SOLR 1499 provided refactoring which reso
edismax consider magic fields '_query_' and '_val_'
---
Key: SOLR-2959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2959:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> edismax consider magic fields '_query_' and '_val_'
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2959:
Description: The edismax query parser should recognize '\_query\_' and
'\_val\_' as so-called magic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2959:
Attachment: SOLR-2959.patch
> edismax consider magic fields '_query_' and '_val_'
>
XPathEntityProcessor does not clear nulls from empty fields
---
Key: SOLR-2960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2960
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2960:
Summary: XPathEntityProcessor does not clear nulls from empty multi-valued
fields (was: XPathEntity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2960:
Attachment: SOLR-2960.patch
for branch_3x
> XPathEntityProcessor does not clear nul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2959:
Attachment: (was: SOLR-2959.patch)
> edismax consider magic fields '_query_' and '_val_'
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Watts updated SOLR-2959:
Attachment: SOLR-2959.patch
second upload of patch, this time 'granted inclusion'
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166795#comment-13166795
]
Yandong Yao commented on SOLR-2481:
---
Thanks, is there any plan to commit this to Solr 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2481.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Committed to trunk.
> Add support for c
80 matches
Mail list logo
